Steil Dispells Myth About The Federal Takeover Of Elections

0
Steil Dispells Myth About The Federal Takeover Of Elections
Image source: <a href="https://youtu.be/qADSTdD2ldQ">YouTube Video Screenshot</a>

Steil Dispels Democrats’ Myth that a Federal Takeover of Elections is Necessary to Increase Americans’ Access to the Polls

Know more about Russia than your friends:

Get our free ebook on how the Soviet Union became Putin's Russia.

Q4 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

A Federal Takeover Of Elections Isn't Necessary

Washington, DC – Committee on House Administration Subcommittee on Elections Ranking Member Bryan Steil (R-Wis.) today delivered this opening statement dispelling Democrats' myth that a federal takeover of elections, H.R. 1, is necessary to increase Americans' access to the polls at today's hearing.

Metolius Capital Thinks UK Is Undervalued As Inflation Finally Shows Signs Of Acceleration

UKThe Metolius Capital unlevered benchmark strategy has returned 5.6% for the year to the end of March. That's according to a copy of the firm's March investor update, which ValueWalk has been able to review. The manager's enhanced fund, which is 2.5x levered, has returned 14.1%. The funds returned 13.6% and 33.7% respectively in 2020. Read More


Steil's opening remarks:

Thank you very much, Chairman. I appreciate you having today's hearing focused on "ensuring free and fair access to the ballot." I'm glad we're talking about this, because Republicans want to ensure that every eligible person who wants to vote is able to cast a vote and that we make sure that every lawful ballot is counted according to state law.

I'd be remiss, not to point out a bit of irony, as we're sitting here today holding an important investigative hearing after the House passed H.R. 1, a partisan vote in favor and bipartisan vote in opposition to H.R. 1, and many on this committee will recall, no opportunity to markup or make amendments, to learn from hearings like we could have had today prior to that bill being passed. But alas, here we are during Holy Week on a district work period, joining together to review the importance of making sure that we have it easy to vote and hard to cheat on.

And as we look back, more Americans are voting than ever before. And I think you noted that in your opening comments, that it's great for our republic. In 2020, 158.4 million Americans voted in the presidential election, the highest ever. Wisconsin had record voter turnout in the 2012 election, like many states did. Wisconsin is in the top five for voter turnout. And I think it's remiss.

Fewer People Voting

Do not ask the question of ourselves: Was this because of a federal mandate or was it because states were deciding what works best for them as it relates to voting?

Those numbers, I think, will shock some people listening to this, because the narrative being pushed, I think, is counter to the idea that we had 158 million Americans vote in the last election. And I think some of the narrative that we're hearing is because we're seeing fewer people voting, while we're seeing higher people voting, we have no choice but to federalize our election.

The crisis here is so dire that H.R. 1 needed to be rushed through the House again with only one hearing in this committee, no hearings and others, no amendments allowed to be offered, particularly no amendments following a major global pandemic that were more or less still in no ability to learn our lessons of what happened in the 2020 election to be implemented into this major piece of legislation. So now we're stuck with more of a messaging bill than a real viable piece of legislation that had true bipartisan input.

What are some of the problems with H.R. 1? It got voter ID protections, for example, in Wisconsin state with a strong voter ID law. This would this bill would allow an individual to vote simply by signing a sworn statement. That's it.

It legalizes ballot harvesting at the national level and allow federal funding of congressional campaigns, give government money to fund politicians re-election efforts, fund negative TV ads.

And as we recall, the 800 page bill was rushed through Congress with no consideration of how will it be implemented at the state and local level. As we know here, each state has different election laws because each state is different.

Wisconsin's Election System

Wisconsin has a unique election system in my home state here in Wisconsin, where voter rolls are centralized. Chins are managed by clerks, we have 1,852 local governments overseeing 2,800 polling places and 30,000 poll workers, very different than some of our other states around the country.

So laws that govern your right to vote should be made at the level of government closest to the people, not by politicians in Washington, D.C., more focused on appeasing special interest groups, trying to get government money into their re-election efforts. We should be focused on what works for voters.

So if there's issues with state laws, we need to work with state legislature, local officials as to how to change and that that's what I am doing here in the state of Wisconsin. So I'm real concern that the Democrat proposal that was put forward in H.R. 1 is going to create more distrust in our election process at a time when we need to secure our elections and restore trust in our election system.

At a time of real record voting turnout, I do not think it is the time to be mandating a one size fits all to our voting system.

And so I look forward to today's discussion and conversation. I do think it's a little bit disappointing. We're doing this after we rushed through H.R. one. But alas, here we are. And I do look forward to today's discussion.

And with that, I yield back the gentleman years back.

Article by Committee on House Administration Republicans

Previous article Activist Campaigns Decline 15% Compared To Last Year
Next article Adviser Fees And Their Effect On Your Returns
Jacob Wolinsky is the founder of ValueWalk.com, a popular value investing and hedge fund focused investment website. Jacob worked as an equity analyst first at a micro-cap focused private equity firm, followed by a stint at a smid cap focused research shop. Jacob lives with his wife and four kids in Passaic NJ. - Email: jacob(at)valuewalk.com - Twitter username: JacobWolinsky - Full Disclosure: I do not purchase any equities anymore to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest and because at times I may receive grey areas of insider information. I have a few existing holdings from years ago, but I have sold off most of the equities and now only purchase mutual funds and some ETFs. I also own a few grams of Gold and Silver

No posts to display