How Nate Silver Became an Issue in the New Hampshire Senate Race

4
How Nate Silver Became an Issue in the New Hampshire Senate Race
Photo by Randy Stewart

How Nate Silver Became an Issue in the New Hampshire Senate Race

Play Quizzes 4

 

In a campaign fundraising email blasted out to constituents last night, New Hampshire Democratic Gov. Maggie Hassan, now running for U.S. Senate, focused on the U.S. Supreme Court and how important the New Hampshire Senate race is in deciding who will sit on the bench.

Morningstar Investment Conference: Fund Manager Highlights Personalized Medicine, Energy Security

Clint Carlson Far ViewHedge fund managers go about finding investment ideas in a variety of different ways. Some target stocks with low multiples, while others look for growth names, and still others combine growth and value when looking for ideas. Some active fund managers use themes to look for ideas, and Owen Fitzpatrick of Aristotle Atlantic Partners is Read More

But her campaign also throws in this fun fact at the end of the email:

“Winning here in New Hampshire is make-or-break for Senate control — and for the future of the Supreme Court. Nate Silver says that Granite Staters ‘have the most influential votes in the country in… the contest for control of the U.S. Senate.’ This means that we HAVE to prioritize electing Maggie.”

Nate Silver screen-shot-2016-10-18-at-8-10-29-am
Nate Silver

Who is Nate Silver? That’s a good question.

Silver is the founder and editor in chief of the political analytics blog FiveThirtyEight in Washington D.C., taking its name from the total number of electors in the Electoral College. He is a whiz when it comes to poll numbers, analyzing them and predicting outcomes of elections.

Silver is a person everyone inside the Beltway knows and reads on a regular basis.

Since August, Hassan’s campaign has sent out more than 40 emails mentioning Silver and his site’s data. He takes a look at polls released in all 50 states, especially in swing states like New Hampshire, and tries to make sense of it all.

Hassan has also been using one of his tweets as a way to encourage voters to donate to her campaign.

On September 20, Silver tweeted that a voter in the Granite State has 16 times more power to determine who controls the Senate than someone in another state.

Since that day, Hassan has used that statistic to show how important it is for people to vote for her in November.

Kelly Ayotte, the incumbent Republican senator, has only sent a fundraising email mentioning Silver to voters one time — and that was last week to blast Hassan’s campaign for using someone New Hampshire voters don’t know.

“Have you heard of Nate Silver? I hadn’t. I had to ask,” the email starts. “Turns out he’s a national political analyst who Maggie Hassan name-checks in her fundraising emails—A LOT!”

The email continues saying how Hassan is raising money nationwide from liberal activists and how Ayotte is only focused on the people of New Hampshire.

“Together, we’re putting New Hampshire first, not the Washington Liberal Establishment,” Ayotte’s campaign wrote.

Nate Silver screen-shot-2016-10-18-at-8-11-06-am
Nate Silver

Ayotte brings up a good point. Why is Hassan using a name like Nate Silver’s in her campaign fundraising emails to New Hampshire voters?

Silver could be called a political pundit or a Washington insider and not many Granite Staters would know who he is unless they are very active in reading DC political news.

Of course, both campaigns are taking money from outside groups, so that point is moot. But both campaigns are also trying to run like they’re independent from Washington money or influence.

In a Friday debate between Ayotte and Hassan, this rhetoric was very apparent.

Ayotte recently withdrew support for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump after a video was released showing him making lewd comments about women. In the debate, Ayotte said she has been willing to stand up to her party’s leadership, unlike Hassan.

Hassan accused her of using “Washington double-speak” to explain her position on Medicare. Ayotte said Hassan was acting like a Beltway insider when it came to the state budget.

“You want to talk about acting like Washington did? She vetoed a budget, and delayed money to address the heroin epidemic, to address mental health beds that we need,” she said. “Now she takes credit for it.”

Ayotte has also sent fundraising emails saying Hassan would be a “rubber stamp” to a Hillary Clinton administration and would do anything her party leadership says.

It doesn’t necessarily help Hassan’s case by campaigning as a Washington outsider while using a name like Nate Silver, who is very much in-the-know in the capital.

Updated on

No posts to display

4 COMMENTS

  1. Nate Silver is hardly a Washington insider. Indeed, the major criticism of him is that he relies too heavily on statistical analysis (however accurate that analysis has proven to be), and too little on policy arguments. Silver is a statistics wonk who just does it better than almost anyone else.

  2. So Hassan is being criticized because she cites a data-based objective political poll analyst? Seems like citing one’s sources is a good thing, not a bad thing. Also, if Ayotte truly did not know who Nate Silver is, that is astounding. She either lied when she said that, or she has her head in the sand.

  3. Start Earning 90 bucks /day for working an online job from your home office for several hr’s each day… Get regular payment every week… Everything you need is a personal computer, connection to the web, along with some free-time… KORTA.NU/NDe

Comments are closed.