Home Top Stories Nassim Taleb On Some Consequences Of LLN In The Real World

Nassim Taleb On Some Consequences Of LLN In The Real World

When you purchase through our sponsored links, we may earn a commission. By using this website you agree to our T&Cs.

Nassim Taleb – Simplest Forms

One-Tailed

  • 1-2 Parameter: Minimum value, tail (Pareto I)
  • 3 Parameters: location m, scale s, tail Alpha (Pareto 2-Lomax)
  • 4 Parameters: Generalized Beta 2nd kind (includes many known distributions such as Singh-Maddala, etc.)

Two-Tailed

  • Student T distribution (finance papers galore)
  • Levy-Stable (to which all those with Alpha<2 converge)
  • Other (double Pareto, etc.)

Sample Equivalence

Dispersion of outcomes: for exponent <2, we cannot use standard deviation and other tools since no second moment. Only MAD , mean absolute deviation of the mean from “true” mean (or 0).

Nassim Taleb

[drizzle]

Indexing by p for powerlaw and g Gaussian:

Nassim Taleb

Back door working

  • Sample mean (“realized a average” in language of finance) is never Gaussian when Alpha<2 (even when >2, another story on CLT (following chapter in Silent Risk))
  • Tail Alpha can be estimated with MLE
  • Tail Alpha from MLE is asymptotically Gaussian (preasymptotically Inverse Gamma with low variance reaches v. quickly)
  • We can fit GPD or EVD with same tail exponent Alpha, further reducing variance.

Nassim Taleb

A few points

When 1<Alpha<2 we can safely say that the sample mean is insignificant and underestimates the mean for one-tailed distributions (reason: infinite skewness). For all sample size.

In some cases, with Alpha<1, we can extract the “true” mean, albeit stochastic. Case study on violence (Cirillo and Taleb, 2015).

Application: the Pikery craze.

Centile contribution: is Pareto 80/20 true?

80/20 by recursing -> Top 1% has 53%

Huuuuuuuuge bias in mean measurement as bracketed -> y-o-y changes suspicious

Nassim Taleb

Conclusion

  • Much of finance, social science, relies on bogus estimators. For instance Pinker’s problem is quite insidious with mechanistic users of statistics.
  • We “recalibrate” models because they are not estimators, chasing past fitness. – As the late Benoit Mandelbrot said: when a lightning hits we do not change the laws of nature.
  • Excellent news: rigorous methods, including using extreme value theory and development of new estimators clears up a lot of problems

See full slides below.

[/drizzle]

Our Editorial Standards

At ValueWalk, we’re committed to providing accurate, research-backed information. Our editors go above and beyond to ensure our content is trustworthy and transparent.

Sheeraz Raza
Editor

Want Financial Guidance Sent Straight to You?

  • Pop your email in the box, and you'll receive bi-weekly emails from ValueWalk.
  • We never send spam — only the latest financial news and guides to help you take charge of your financial future.