Well, Back To Smoking: FDA Bans 99 Percent Of E-Cigarettes


Well, Back To Smoking: FDA Bans 99 Percent Of E-Cigarettes by Guy Bentley, Foundation For Economic Education

Play Quizzes 4

The $3.5 Billion Industry Faces Ruinous Compliance Costs

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published long-awaited rules Thursday that could ban 99 percent of e-cigarette products and wreck industry innovation for years to come.

This Too Value Fund Explains Why Turkey Is Ripe For Investment Right Now

TurkeyThe Talas Turkey Value Fund returned 9.5% net for the first quarter on a concentrated portfolio in which 93% of its capital is invested in 14 holdings. The MSCI Turkey Index returned 13.1% for the first quarter, while the MSCI All-Country ex-USA was down 5.4%. Background of the Talas Turkey Value Fund Since its inception Read More

Passed in 2009, the Tobacco Control Act says all e-cigarette products released after February 15, 2007, (predicate date) will have to go through the Pre-Market Tobacco Applications process (PMTA). FDA officials claim they cannot change the predicate date.

The PMTA is ruinously expensive and can cost millions of dollars per product and by the FDA’s own admission will take more than 1,700 hours for an applicant to complete.

Since almost all vapor products on the market were released after February 2007, hardly any will avoid a PMTA and almost no businesses, with the exception of big tobacco companies, will be able to bear the regulatory burden.

“The agency’s economic analysis of the rule predicts that the cost of such approvals will be so high that approximately 99 percent of products on the market will not even be put through the application process,” says the American Vaping Association (AVA).

The rules usher in a new era of federal regulation, with sales of vapor products to those under the age of 18 banned nationwide. Most states had already passed laws banning e-cigarette sales to minors.

“This final rule is a foundational step that enables the FDA to regulate products young people were using at alarming rates, like e-cigarettes, cigars and hookah tobacco, that had gone largely unregulated,” Mitch Zeller, director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, said in a press release. The FDA will now set industry standards for manufacturing and labeling. The rules will take effect in 90 days.

But there is still hope for the industry yet after a House Appropriations committee passed an amendment April 19, which would alter the predicate date. The amendment is not yet law and will have to pass through the House of Representatives.

E-Cigarettes – FDA

If the amendment fails however and the FDA regulations stand, the industry will have two years to comply with the PMTA.

“Despite an overabundance of distorted and misleading information propagated by some in the public health community, the science is clear – responsibly manufactured vapor products are not only a safer alternative to traditional combustible products, but also provide smokers with a viable path to reducing their tobacco consumption and quitting altogether,” said Tony Abboud, the Vapor Technology Association’s National Legislative Director.

“Today’s action by the FDA will do nothing to improve our nations’ public health objectives. To the contrary, today’s action will yank responsibly manufactured vapor products from the hands of adult smokers and replace them with the tobacco cigarettes they had been trying to give up.”

The VTA argue the FDA’s rules will kill almost a decade of innovation in the e-cigarette space and put thousands of small and mid-size businesses out of businesses to the benefit of major tobacco companies.

“If, in the name of public health, federal regulations inhibit much-needed innovation in the e-cigarette market, public health would actually suffer, as fewer adult smokers would be likely to switch from smoking,” said the National Center for Public Policy Research’s director of Risk Analysis, Jeff Stier.

“One only needs to look at the rapid innovation coming from the vaping industry to see how devastating this rule will be,” Jared Meyer, Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an emailed statement.

“While large tobacco companies will likely be able to absorb these costs, countless small manufacturers will be put out of business – leading to a less dynamic market. Without continued innovation, it will be harder from cigarette smokers to kick their deadly habit by taking up a much less harmful form of nicotine consumption,” Meyer added.

According to Wells Fargo, e-cigarette sales amounted to $3.5 billion in 2015. The case for wide-spread e-cigarette use was given a boost April 27 after the Royal College of Physicians published a 200-page report supporting the products as a smoking cessation method.

Reprinted with permission  from the Daily Caller News Foundation.

E-Cigarettes – Image source: Wikimedia Commons

Updated on

No posts to display


  1. Besides the fact that the FDA ignores and allows residues of over 400 “legal” tobacco pesticides in typical cigarettes, AND ignores/allows dioxins in smoke from typical cigs via chlorine pesticides and chlorine-bleached paper, AND allows/ignores cancer-causing rads from Still Legal rad-contaminated phosphate tobacco fertilizers… there’s more.

    To attack “smoking” (of what, exactly, never said) is to blame the victims of perhaps the most toxic, carcinogenic INDUSTRIALLY-Contaminated product on the planet. But the “sinful” tobacco plant is to take the rest of the blame. Mother Nature doesn’t have enough lawyers.
    The makers of some 400 Still Legal tobacco pesticides, chlorine/dioxin industries that supply the chlorine pesticides and chlorine-bleached paper, suppliers of radioactive phosphate tobacco fertilizers (STILL legal), and suppliers of any of over 1000 untested, often toxic, unlabeled cigarette additives are Off The Hook. The enormity of liabilities and criminal charges against the Cigarette Cartel (incl. pesticides, pharms, fertilizers, chlorine, sugar, Ag Biz, etc AND their Insurers and Wall St. Investors) makes it a MAJOR important deal for the corporate establishment (and complicit mainstream media) to scapegoat A) the unpatented natural tobacco plant, and B) the unwitting, unprotected, secretly-poisoned smokers…who are told and who believe that they are smoking just tobacco. FAR FAr Far far from it. A typical cig may contain absolutely no tobacco. To call that a “tobacco product”, or its smoke “tobacco smoke”, is wrong, or a lie…perjury if under oath.
    Big dark question is…Why do environmentalist, anti pesticides, health activist etc Left Progressive groups go along with the Corporatocracy’s latest natural plant prohibition (now that cannabis is becoming re-legalized)…this time on the “evil’ tobacco plant? Has the left been infiltrated more than we know?

    Search up http://fauxbacco.blogspot.com for ample references

Comments are closed.