Using The Chai Latte As Replacement For The Big Mac Index

1
Using The Chai Latte As Replacement For The Big Mac Index

The Chai Latte Global Index is trying to show the purchasing power of different country’s currencies in a funny and easy way, upon Starbuck’s global pricing strategy. It is also based on the theory of the purchasing power parity (PPP) and that exchange rates in the future should change, so the purchasing power of two different currencies and therefore the prices of the same products and services are equalized, by resolving differences like cost of living and inflation rates.

Play Quizzes 4

Since chai latte has become popular outside of its homeland India, it conquered almost every corner of the world. This delicious black tea, infused with warming exotic spices and combined with steamed milk, is not just a delightful hot drink, but can also show the economical differences in the world.

Theoretically the price of a Starbucks Chai Latte in New York should be the same as the price of a Starbucks Chai Latte in Berlin, Istanbul and everywhere else, but it is not, although the ingredients are mostly consistent. For instance, a Starbucks Chai Latte in Colombia costs 9300 Colombian Pesos, which makes, at the current exchange rate, about $3,25 USD. In Sweden, on the other hand, it costs 5,40 Euro, which makes around $5,76, meaning that a Colombian would pay much more for a Chai Latte in Sweden than in Colombia or even less in India ($2,94).

Is First Gen An Overlooked Power Play That Deserves A Re-Rating?

environmental 1651092002The post was originally published here. Highlights: Resolving gas supply issues ensures longevity A pioneer in renewable energy should be future proof Undemanding valuation could lead to re-rating Q1 2022 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

This means that the Colombian pesos are undervalued to the Swedish Euro or to the USD, since a Chai Latte costs about $4,84, because the value of the Colombian Pesos in the exchange with USD or Euro is less than it should be considering economic conditions.

The USD is overvalued against almost all currencies in the world, but generally an overvalued currency doesn’t necessarily mean that the economy is the biggest, as well as an undervalued currency does not mean that the country’s economy isn’t strong. For instance, a currency might be undervalued because of a lack of demand. There might also be different reasons, like the willingness of investors to take risks or uncertainty in general, a lower business confidence and growth projection, political instability and low tax collections.

The Chai Latte Global Index should not be considered as an accurate way of measuring, but rather a less heavy way of seeing economics, since it is by far not perfect. When calculating the accurate purchasing power parity for long and short term or for having a more realistic view on the economical differences, other factors must be considered and differentiated.

For instance, actual differences between the Starbucks’ Chai Latte drinks worldwide must be taken into consideration, like size and ingredients and how easy obtainable the ingredients in the specific countries are. In India for example, where chai latte originates from, the obtainability of the special spices you need for this drink is much higher than in Canada. So countries that don’t produce these spices locally, like Canada or Sweden, have other costs that have to be considered, like transport costs and tariffs for importing the goods. When looking at the purchasing power parity, an important point are the non-traded goods, which are not traded internationally, like Starbucks’ or Mcdonald’s products.

The price of these products is influenced by input costs that are hard to be equal worldwide, like the cost of labor, storefront costs, heating, insurances etc. When these non-traded items or services costs are high, the goods in this country will also be more expensive and the country’s currency will most likely be overvalued against the currencies of countries with low-cost non-traded services. Therefore the higher labor cost is a big reason for the higher Chai Lattes prices in countries like the US, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Sweden and Austria, while the prices in Mexico, Egypt, Argentina and India are lower.

Another influencing factor for product prices in some countries are sales taxes, like the value-added tax (VAT), which are higher in some countries, especially European countries, and make products or services sell at higher price. An important factor is also the inflation rate, showing at which rate the price of certain goods change in the countries and can show the value of their currencies.

To get a more accurate picture of the fair value of a country’s currency these factors should definitely be considered, or the GDP per person should be taken into relation to the prices of the products, but again the PPP-theory within this Chai Latte Global Index is not a science but rather a much more light-hearted and fun way to look at economy.

See the Versus infographic here or below.

Chai Latte Global Index

Chai Latte Global Index

 

Updated on

No posts to display

1 COMMENT

  1. This is not accurate. I’ve lived in Argentina for 6 months and coffee shops are expensive and so are so are fast food restaurants (another commonly used pricing parody parallel). Starbucks is somewhere around 35% more than it is back in the states. Of course their are other places where you can find a cheaper cup of coffee but the quality is lower so it’s like comparing apples to oranges. Comparing Starbucks to Starbucks you are looking at a 35% price increase. A house coffee with milk will run you about 4$ in Argentina. Here it is $2.50. Furthermore if you want to find good beans to brew at home you are really looking to pay a premium. Using the big mac price parity it is more or less the same situation. I found the dollar menu (adjusted for conversion rates, it wasn’t called the dollar menu but that is what is was more or less) was of an inferior in quality so not as much of a value as in the States. This is especially peculiar since a pound of grass fed premium quality beef is only about 5$ and the quality is spectacular. The same kind of beef here would be hard to come by and could command prices of 25$ a pound. On the other hand consumer goods and consumer durable’s likes Nike Shoes, or a Samsung Washing Machine will cost you nearly 50% more than here in the states on msrp, if you consider the easy availability of discounted prices from msrp that number jumps significantly. Overall food. rent, and public transportation there is cheaper but everything else is more expensive including private transportation, gas, consumer goods, and consumer durables. This makes it very hard to decide which country is cheaper to live in. I think Argentina overall is slightly cheaper, but my experience was that Argentina is not a cheap country. Using this pricing parity method would lead on to conclude it is vastly cheaper. The sheer scale of this miscalculation makes feel that this price parity method is simply erroneous. It just goes to show how complicated economics can be. Most economic theories treat the situations as if they are in a bubble but is never the case. A complicated mix of tariffs, and economic policies, labor and safety laws, trade agreements, and a countries hierarchy in the global economy all play a role in the real world complications of pricing parity. This rather linear equation makes Argentina seem exceedingly cheap and I can tell you with certainty nothing could be further from the truth.

Comments are closed.