Provisions From January’s High Yield Bonds

Provisions From January’s High Yield Bonds
<a href="">mohamed_hassan</a> / Pixabay

It’s hard to keep up with all the new issuance, let alone the terms in those deals that could be detrimental to one’s investment. In a new report Xtract Research highlights provisions from January’s high yield bonds which may give many investors pause.

Get The Full Ray Dalio Series in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on Ray Dalio in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues

Q4 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

Provisions You Need to Know From January’s High Yield Bonds

Highlights from the report include:

GrizzlyRock Value Partners returned 30 percent in the fourth quarter; Here are their favorite stocks

GrizzlyGrizzlyRock Value Partners returned 30.31% net for the fourth quarter, bringing its full-year return to 7.57% net. During the fourth quarter, longs added 42.8%, while shorts detracted 10.3%. Q4 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more In his annual letter to investors, which was reviewed by ValueWalk, managing partner Kyle Mowery noted that 2020 was Read More

Truck Hero’s Senior Notes contain no restriction on reclassifying outstanding Term Loan borrowings ($1.55B) out of the credit facility basket when it can meet the ratios.

NGL issued notes that in one respect were far tighter than most deals, as the covenants include protections against early repayment of existing senior notes and antilayering provisions for liens and payment subordination that would limit "first out" debt to $25mm. However, reclassification risk exists that could allow for emptying of the credit facilities basket, as the outstanding ABL debt and notes issued on the issue date are "initially… deemed to have been incurred on such date" under the credit facilities basket. It does not require, as it should, that such debt may not be later reclassified.

This problem even exists in high yield lite bonds. In Crowdstrike’s Senior Notes while there is no debt covenant, there is nothing in the liens covenant that mandates that secured bank debt be incurred under the $1B credit facilities lien basket, and any liens that actually are incurred under that basket can be reclassified away from it.

The PetSmart and Park River deals include an expansion of the similar business definition that we have been seeing from time to time, since PetSmart’s alleged use of the basket (when it started moving part of Chewy out of the credit and into an Unrestricted Subsidiary (and also another portion to its sponsor)).

No posts to display