Infrastructure India Fund – Small, Risky But Good Upside Potential

Infrastructure India Fund – Small, Risky But Good Upside Potential
myeviajes / Pixabay

Article by Deep Value Investments Blog ~ by Rob Mahan  @DeepValueInv

Just put a very small position (1.4% portfolio) in Infrastructure India Fund at 3p.

It has come up on my screens a few times but is now too cheap to ignore.  This is highly risky stuff but has very good upside – if it all plays out.  I can see a multiple of the current share price in a year or two.

Fund Manager Profile: Kris Sidial Of Tail Risk Fund Ambrus Group

invest Southpoint CapitalA decade ago, no one talked about tail risk hedge funds, which were a minuscule niche of the market. However, today many large investors, including pension funds and other institutions, have mandates that require the inclusion of tail risk protection. In a recent interview with ValueWalk, Kris Sidial of tail risk fund Ambrus Group, a Read More

Get Our Activist Investing Case Study!

Get the entire 10-part series on our in-depth study on activist investing in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or print it out to read anywhere! Sign up below!

This is breaking one of my investment rules – it is 75.40% owned by GGIC IIP Holdings limited.  Something I usually avoid – they are Guggenheim Investment Partners – a very large US asset manager.  As far as I have been able to find there are no minority shareholder protections in place.  Guggenheim can delist the company at will – as they own over 75%.  Odd thing about this is that it was sold at IPO with assets from Guggenheim, then bought more from Guggenheim with a placement taking their stake back up to the current 75%.

Guggenheim also control company debt that needs refinancing – albeit only a small amount of debt.  $25m vs a NAV of  $237m.  This again provides a back-door route to seizing the 25% of the company they don’t own.

I actually don’t think this will happen – as an asset management company Guggenheim need outside capital – it won’t do to simply steal from minorities, particularly for at most $70m.  They could simply offer $50m – double the current share price, buy out the minorities and do it nicely.  Guggenheim partners have $290bn AUM so this is small change to them and not worth the reputational hit.  Institutional investors like them like to rob you slowly – via excessive fees mostly….

I have googled intensively and found no instances where Guggenheim have screwed over minorities before – I am not ruling it out.  They have received a lot of bad press of late – something I think means being screwed here is much less likely.

Being just one example…

Performance has been terrible – NAV has fallen from £373m in 2015 to £282m now.

Fees are excessive – £5m a year plus shares to manage a series of companies that should be able to manage themselved – this is c1.8% of the NAV.  Management are former Guggenheim partners – parachuted in here.  There is lots not to like here.

The assets are pretty very hard to analyse.  As a plus when they sold a toll road in 2016 it was only at a 16% discount to NAV.  Auditors are KPMG – provides some reassurance…

Assets are as follows:

SMH  – 400MW Hydropower – 31% stake  – NAV £10m – My value £0 but option value.

This has £343m debt and is incomplete, miracles can happen and this might not be worthless – but my strong bet is that this is worth 0.

IEL – 41MW Wind  – 100% stake – Nav £10.6m – My value £10.6m

Project has £11m debt.  I would be willing to bet this could be sold reasonably easily – but it doesnt make a dent in running costs so largely immaterial.

IHDC – 62MW Hydro + 30MW under construction – 50% stake Nav £29m – My value £29m

Project has £8.9m debt, again I would imagine this is easy to sell, slightly more material.

DLI – 37.4% valuation £246.4, project debt £85.7.  Container / transport/ shipping.  Valuation comes from NPV calculation.  Apparently the terminals are ‘close’ to completion but need more investment.  Disclosure is poor as to exactly how much or when they will be completed / what they will earn.  Valuation is falling – presumably they are paying debt on work in progress but not making progress due to lack of funds.

At a company level they have £29.5m of debt vs a NAV of £237.5m or £0.35 per share.  This is a tenth of the current share price.  Given the valuation of their underlying assets I would hope there is scope for the trust to (for example, sell)their £49.6 (ish) of good assets to do something with the £246m assets.

There is ongoing bridging funding in place – and a loan is being discussed.  Negotiations are said to be ‘advanced’.

I suspect if sustainable financing is announced the share price will rise significantly – hopefully rising more when projects are successfully completed.  Ultimately Indian infrastructure is a decent place to invest – over the last 5 years most have a CAGR of 15-20%.  This has fallen from about 65p to 3p – or about -50% every year….

This is high risk – I dont trust management, I dont trust the major shareholder / bond holder – but I think their somewhat ghetto reputation puts them on a leash.  This is so cheap I am prepared to have a very small punt, with the hope of a rapid / strong return.  This is something of an experiment for me – I have observed bombed out things turning round, often when they hit a tenth of NAV on a number of occassions so I am going to try investing in them in very small size.

As ever comments, positive or negative are appreciated…


No posts to display