Home Top Stories Klarman 2017 Letter: Softbank And Sequoia As Symptoms Of The Bubble

Klarman 2017 Letter: Softbank And Sequoia As Symptoms Of The Bubble

When you purchase through our sponsored links, we may earn a commission. By using this website you agree to our T&Cs.

– We have some highlights of the Baupost 2017 letter on ValueWalk Premium – since the site just launched we posted here although you really should get our newsletter and check out the other site – also many will ask – also please do not email our staff asking us for copies of the material we are unable to send and therefore will not. Anyway here are links to five articles we have on the topic and with a brief excerpt though on an issue which is not my expertise but seems a bit bubbly – the company known as Softbank and the VC firm known as Sequioa (no relation to SEQUX)

Get The Full Seth Klarman Series in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on Seth Klarman in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues.

Seth Klarman comments in Baupost 2017 letter to investors the following on the controversial  company.

Capital poured into higher-risk venture investments at an accelerated pace in 2017. Japan's SoftBank, owner of nearly 30% of Alibaba, the Chinese e-commerce company, announced the formation in late 2016 of its $100 billion Vision Fund to make technology investments. SoftBank itself would contribute t0 $28 billion, with the rest coming from other deep pockets, including the sovereign wealth funds of Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi, as well as Apple. SoftBank later indicated that a second larger fund was under consideration. Sequoia Capital announced plans to raise a new $5 billion fund, the largest ever assembled by a US venture capital firm. Vast amounts of money relentlessly pouring into high-tech investments inevitably portends the loss of investment discipline in the sector. We have seen this movie before.

Those are Klarman's words as part of his overall bearish worries about the world.

This movie before I would guess refers specifically to the tech bubble of the late 1990s, but could apply to any bubble.

But that is not all: Combine the above with political risk, Chinese debt and the Fed removing the punch-bowl, and? It is time to be cautious, the bears (and Klarman here) would argue

Below readers can find more of our coverage on Baupost 2017 letter

Klarman On


 the danger of Chinese leverage

Discipline while value investing in bubby times

Value investing is not dead

Radicalization of politics

Dangerous FAANG valuations

Do you think Klarman is right about the current market or wrong? Let us know in the comments section!

Our Editorial Standards

At ValueWalk, we’re committed to providing accurate, research-backed information. Our editors go above and beyond to ensure our content is trustworthy and transparent.

Jacob Wolinsky

Want Financial Guidance Sent Straight to You?

  • Pop your email in the box, and you'll receive bi-weekly emails from ValueWalk.
  • We never send spam — only the latest financial news and guides to help you take charge of your financial future.