Despite Millions Spent, Prop 22 Failing to Get Majority Support

Gig Workers Rising statement on new polling showing Prop 22 failing to get majority support

Get Our Activist Investing Case Study!

Get the entire 10-part series on our in-depth study on activist investing in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or print it out to read anywhere! Sign up below!

Q3 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

Prop 22 Failing To Get Majority Support

Today, a new poll showed that, despite a 10-1 funding advantage by gig companies like Uber and Lyft, support for Prop 22 is still neck-and-neck with opposition in California and that support for the measure is failing to reach the 50% + 1 it will need to become law.

Michael Mauboussin’s 10 Attributes of Great Investors [Pt.1]

michael mauboussin, Credit Suisse, valuation and portfolio positioning, capital markets theory, competitive strategy analysis, decision making, skill versus luck, value investing, Legg Mason, The Success Equation, Think Twice: Harnessing the Power of Counterintuition, analysts, behavioral finance, More Than You Know: Finding Financial Wisdom in Unconventional Places, academics , valuewalkIn 2016, Michael J. Mauboussin completed his 30th year on Wall Street. The analyst, who was working at Credit Suisse at the time, decided to celebrate by reflecting on the ten attributes of great investors he had observed over the previous three decades. He published his ideas in a report in August 2016. I've summarised Read More


The new poll from the Institute for Governmental Studies at U.C. Berkeley shows that support for Proposition 22 is still tied with the opposition, despite new numbers late last week that showed Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Instacart, and Postmates had poured more than $199 million into the ballot measure. Opposition has raised some $19.6 million.

The poll shows supporters at 46% with opponents at 42%, and some 12% of those polled still undecided. This is with a 2% likely margin of error, meaning the results are essentially tied.

We also know that a plurality of Californians who are voting for the measure are being misled by gig companies: According to a Capitol Weekly tracking poll of 23,500 voters who’ve returned ballots, a full 40% of those who voted for Prop. 22 thought they were ensuring drivers a living wage.

The Actual Take-Home Wage For Drivers

We know that’s not true. Prop 22 only covers wage guarantees for engaged time—time that drivers spend ferrying a customer around, despite a report commissioned by Uber and Lyft themselves showing that as much as a third of the time that drivers spend working is spent waiting for rides.

None of that time would be counted under Prop 22, and, as the U.C. Berkeley Labor Center has shown, the actual hourly wage drivers are expected to receive is closer to $5.64—not minimum wage by any definition, and definitely not the liveable wage voters are told applies.

Californians are being tricked into voting for this measure. The flood of misleading advertising promising a living wage is pushing voters sympathetic to drivers' plights to support Prop 22 without knowing that the actual take-home wage for drivers will be a poverty wage. The companies know they can't win on the merits, so they're hoping a spending blitz will prevent them from having to take care of their drivers once and for all.

But even those millions aren't working as intended. For Prop. 22 to be so close to defeat, with a 10-1 funding advantage, should be deeply embarrassing for these multi-billion dollar companies, and heartening for drivers and workers across California.