CNBC Transcript: United Technologies Corporation (NYSE:UTX) Chairman and CEO Greg Hayes and Raytheon Company (NYSE:RTN) Chairman and CEO Tom Kennedy Speak with CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” Today
WHEN: Today, Monday, June 10, 2019
WHERE: CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street”
Coho Capital 2Q20 Commentary: Podcasts, The New Talk Radio
Coho Capital commentary for the second quarter ended June 30, 2020. Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Dear Partners, Coho Capital returned 46.6% during the first half of the year compared to a loss of 3.1% in the S&P 500. Many of our holdings, such as Netflix, Amazon, and Spotify, were perceived beneficiaries Read More
The following is the unofficial transcript of a CNBC interview with United Technologies Chairman and CEO Greg Hayes and Raytheon Chairman and CEO Tom Kennedy on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” (M-F 9AM – 11AM) today, Monday, June 10th. The following is a link to video from the interview on CNBC.com:
Watch CNBC’s full interview with the CEOs of United Technologies and Raytheon
All references must be sourced to CNBC.
CARL QUINTANILLA: We’re going to talk to Hayes and Kennedy, in a minute. Speaking of Raytheon UTX, though, the President did mention that deal as well. Take a listen.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: When I hear United and I hear Raytheon--which is another incredible company, the missile systems they make are incredible--when I hear they are merging, does that take away more competition? It becomes one big fat beautiful company. But I have to negotiate, meaning the United States has to buy things. And does that make it less competitive? Because it is so already very less – it’s already not competitive.
JIM CRAMER: You know what, we happen to have to have the people here who might be able to answer that question. We have United Technologies’ Greg Hayes and Tom Kennedy from Raytheon. This is an all-stock merger, one of the most exciting things, I know Greg knows it -- it is just crazy – but this is going to be a behemoth, valued at more than $100 billion, so I am just going to go right there. Greg, you just heard the President, he likes the idea of combination but he’s worried about competition. Will it make things less competitive?
GREG HAYES: Absolutely not. I think—again, we are looking forward to talking to the President later today. I think once he understands the benefits of this merger, in terms of what is going to do to reduce costs to the government, what it is going to do to improve the technology of the U.S. government and our defense profile, and what it is going to do for jobs in this country, I think he’s going to be supportive as he has been for both of the companies over his administration.
JIM CRAMER: Well, Dr. Kennedy, I do have a question, you have a fabulous set of business: missile, fantastic. Aerospace, great. If the President says, ‘You know what, we want you to compete against United Technologies anyway, even though you don’t, because we want you to lower prices.’ What do you say to the idea that he says, ‘Hey, you guys are both defense. Defense, you’ve got to compete. We don’t want this,’ and even Ash Cater, whom I guess he would trash as a Democrat but still was a distinguished American says we shouldn’t not have more defense combinations. How do you deal with that kind of 90,000 square – 90,000-foot analysis that the President gives you? You know. It’s up here.
TOM KENNEDY: First of all, I’ve got to go back to what you said. We are complimentary, we are not competitive. I don’t remember the last time we competed against United Technologies. We do partner with them. They have some complimentary technologies we bring together with our technology to go to the marketplace. In this case here, we’re going to be able to take about $8 billion of research and development spend and our 60,000 engineers to develop the next level of technologies to create the next generation franchises so we can go to the international global marketplace and take windows in markets and bring that stuff back to the U.S. to create more jobs. And that’s what we need. We need to create more jobs in this country -- more manufacturing-related jobs so we can take the economy even to the next step from what the President is driving to. So, I think once the President hears our story and understands the complimentary nature and the power of this merger of equals in the international marketplace, he’ll understand how we are going to be able to generate more jobs and take this country and make it more secure in the future.
CARL QUINTANILLA: We should be clear. The President, his line was, if you want to buy a plane, you don’t get any bids. You guys don’t make planes. That’s not what this is about.
GREG HAYES: We are platform agnostic. We are a systems provider across the entire commercial aerospace sector and the complete defense sector. So, this is not about bidding on planes. In fact, if you think about it, Tom is exactly right. We are complementary, there is no overlap here, and there still is competition. Right. We still compete with everybody else for all of these systems. The technology that we have by bringing the companies together just makes it so much better from a -- what we can offer to the customers.
CARL QUINTANILLA: So, but if the complaint is about single-bid solicitations and consolidation among contractors, does it get any more scrutiny from an optics standpoint?
GREG HAYES: I don’t think so. Look, we’re big. Right? We’ll be about 75 billion combined proforma this year, almost 80 next year. But if you think about that, we are still the same companies that we have always been. Right? We are still going to be customer focused in everything we do. There is nothing anticompetitive of bringing these companies together.
JIM CRAMER: Alright I want to be sure about that. Because you know– Ash Carter’s a smart guy, he did say there should be consolidation – I know when I first heard this, Tom, let me ask you: we really do want many defense contractors because it helps us a nation to have lots of different companies bid for lots of different deals. Aren’t there some deals that you might have gone for, I know you haven’t competed with Greg, that maybe Greg would have decided to get involved after the most recent acquisition he’s made and you – the President is right that you come up with a division that could compete against it.
TOM KENNEDY: Well, for example, Pratt & Whitney, we don’t build engines. And so, we’re not going to compete--
JIM CRAMER: Right. But the President might say ‘Why don’t you?’ Remember, the President may not be as sophisticated as you gentlemen. I’m just putting that out there. That’s just not gospel. But see, he may say, ‘You make aerospace and you make aerospace. No.’ Because, you know, he’s not really a detail guy.
TOM KENNEDY: Jim, let me just take it back a step here. So, number one is what this merger of equals provides is a strong-based company with strong technologies that it can take into the marketplace. And this is on – when I say marketplace, I mean the global marketplace. That is going to allow us to take that business back to the United States, where are manufacturing facilities are. We’re going to be able to create more jobs. And these are noble jobs. These are jobs that pay way over minimum wage. They allow folks to be able to, you know, buy a house if they want, send their kids to schools. These are very powerful jobs. And that’s what we are trying to create. And at the same time, we are also trying to secure the sovereignty of our nation and the security of our nation. Not just on the defense side but also on a civil air-side. And on the civil air-side, what we bring is our technologies and cyber security to help secure the civil air-side of our country. And then, on the military side, we bring our patriots and our missiles and our other capabilities to secure us from a defense perspective. So, this is an overall great play for the United States of America, making us a better country, a much stronger country, and a country that’s built on noble jobs. It is a win-win for all.
JIM CRAMER: Okay. Alright. Greg, complicated transaction. Because you have not done your spin-offs yet of Carrier and Otis. How does the average person try to understand what he gets? It seems like if you don’t tender, you just still get United Technologies. If you do tender, you get the new Raytheon. You have created a kind of a complex transaction.
GREG HAYES: Well, in fact, Jim, I think this actually simplifies our life going forward. I know, if you think about it, we are on track. Right? We’re going to be ready to spin Otis and Carrier end of this year. I think we’ll get all of the regulatory approvals. The target is end of March to all be done. At the same time, we think this transaction because of the complementary nature, very little regulatory hurdles out there. Again, less than 1% overlap in sales. We think the benefit here is instead of standing up at UTC Aero corporate office and then six months later merging the companies, we’re going to do it all concurrently. It’s going to save a lot of money. It is going to be a great combination from our shareowner’s perspective. A UTX shareowner gets a share Otis, they get a share of Carrier and they’re going to get a share of RTX. And that’s, I think, a huge benefit to everybody.
CARL QUINTANILLA: The President said he’s bought many an Otis elevator. Is there anything that Otis or Carrier tells us about China right now -- China growth?
GREG HAYES: Well, in fact, we were just looking at the orders coming out of China last week and China is recovering. The market looks pretty good. We’re still looking at 500,000 elevators, marketplace. We’ll ship about 88,000 of those this year out of our China business. The business is recovered. It’s been three years. Right. We saw pricing deteriorating, we saw profitability deteriorate. The last probably four quarters we’ve actually started to see an uptake. So, despite all the tariffs and all of the other noise that you hear, I would tell you the Chinese domestic market is relatively robust.
JIM CRAMER: Well, that is at odds but great to hear. But I do also want to know, you’re platform agnostic. Dennis Muilenburg at Boeing, when the hell is that going to be able to be resolved? I mean, I know it’s pushed back again. What’s your take on it?
GREG HAYES: Well, look: we have been working with the Boeing company to resolve some of the issues on the software and the sensors. We are a supplier to the Boeing company. I can’t comment obviously, Jim, it’s an NTSB ongoing investigation. But all I will say is it’s a great airplane, it is going to be a safe airplane and we fully support Boeing to return its flight status. And the sooner the better. There is nothing more important in aviation than flight safety. And Tom touched on it, I think the capabilities of our combined companies will improve that. But, I am absolutely confident that Boeing company will get it right.
JIM CRAMER: Alright. And Tom, I think your missile business is second to no one. But what I do worry about, the margins have been going down, not to your satisfaction. You just had Wes Kremer come in -- you had a little change, although the previous fellow did want to retire. You also have let’s just say classified information that we don’t know that brought your margins down. It always made it hard for me to analyze Raytheon, as you know, because the last – it’s great to have new orders, but not good to pull down the margins. Will we have to worry with any of that once it’s combined? Because it will not be as big a part of the vast mosaic.
TOM KENNEDY: Well, I don’t think there’s anything to worry about. And so, it’s actually – it’s kind of a good news story. One of the reasons why the margin pressure is there’s all these programs we have been winning. The business grew 9% year over year in the first quarter. A lot of that was in classified work. That classified work is paying the next generation franchises in the missile business. In that arena, those contracts are cost-plus contracts, which tend to have lower margins. Once we get that as products and new franchises into production then those margins will rise. We are in what’s called a modernization phase relative for the Department of Defense. And so, the modernization budget has significantly increased over the years. For example, in fiscal year ’18, the modernization budget increased 19% and increased another 2%-3% in 19 and the President’s budget coming forward is another 3% growth. So it is all in the modernization budget. And the missile company has been capturing a large part of that budget. And what that it is doing for us in the future that it is going to provide the franchises for the next generation.
JIM CRAMER: Okay. Greg, the -- I am sorry to be so linear but you’ve got two guys – lots of different stuff. I remember, somewhat famously, you came here and you talked about that and a notion of what was going to happen with United Technologies Honeywell, which you had told us – because of antitrust issues, it wasn’t going to happen. Can you delineate why this is less of an antitrust problem then a deal you didn’t really care for: the United Technologies Honeywell.
GREG HAYES: Well, look, if you go back two and half years to the time when Mr. Coty was perusing UTX -- you guys remember that, right?
JIM CRAMER: Yeah, it was kind of played out here.
GREG HAYES: The overlap in our aerospace market, especially commercial, was tremendous – whether it was environment of controls, APUs, small engines, we were looking at divestitures of $8 billion to $10 billion. Right? And as we thought about that-- all the valuation from the merger evaporates when you’ve got $8 billion to $10 billion of divestitures. In this case, you are talking about maybe 1% of our sales. So, let’s call it 750 million. Insignificant. In the business of the overlaps, again, we’ll find good new owners for those businesses that will be competitive. They are just not the antitrust risk that we had with Honeywell. This is a deal that will happen as opposed to the one that ain’t going to happen.
CARL QUINTANILLA: This will be 45 international, Tom?
TOM KENNEDY: About 45% international and defense will be around 50%. I would just step back and say year to year that can change. I would say it’s going to be about, which is a great company if you think about it-- 50% international and 50% domestics—50% defense, 50% commercial. But the bottom line is the underlying technology supports all of that structure. And that’s where we’ll be able to drive and continually leverage that technology to create those next generation franchises in the marketplace.
JIM CRAMER: I want to know, Tom. You’ve got some things in the works and they’re really going to come to fruition once you guys merge. The Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicles, the hypersonic work that you are doing, these are things that make me feel comfortable. How many of these things that are just so revolutionary that the American people could say you know, Raytheon and United Technologies – well Raytheon Tech -- have our back? Because I’ve got to tell you, this is all very science-fiction what you’ve got in the box.
TOM KENNEDY: Well, it’s – I’ll tell you, we are taking science-fiction to reality. And a combined company is going to allow us to do that much quicker and take it to the market much faster. And that’s good for the United States, and it’s good for you and it’s good for Carl and it’s good for all of us here today in our country. So.
JIM CRAMER: Well, okay. And Greg, let’s go over to Otis for a second. You got a terrific new CEO for Otis.
GREG HAYES: Judy Marks.
JIM CRAMER: Yeah, and I’ve really got to applaud you for that. And I think she’s sensational. Obviously great for Carrier. Can these two divisions, I am trying to figure out what they’re worth, now that you have done this. Can you help us trying to figure out, you’ve actually put a value on those two by doing this? Give us a sense of multiples and how you did that. Because it is hard stuff. I spend my life analyzing this stuff and I don’t know how you did it.
GREG HAYES: Well, look, if you think about it, we’ve always talked about the fact that you can unlock values by spinning off Carrier and spinning off Otis as separate companies. We know that a good HVAC company like Carrier, super high margins, 17 or 18%, good growth prospects. That should trade somewhere -- 12 or 12.5 maybe 13 times. And so, we look at that value and I’ve seen numbers as high as $41 billion of kind of EV, so maybe 30 after debt, probably about $30 billion of equity. Same time, Otis, elevator businesses because of the cash flows, probably trade 14.5 or 15 times. You think about that, you’ve got two businesses that combined ought to be worth net-of-debt about $60 billion. Add that to the aerospace business here and some of the parts probably $160.
JIM CRAMER: And it does seem that Raytheon has a fabulous balance. quarter. You probably bought back 2 billion shares last quarter. I mean, you’ve got an unbelievable balance sheet. You have a lot of debt on this. Combined what is the debt profile that you accomplished?
GREG HAYES: It’s perfect. It is going to be an A-rated company with the combined aerospace businesses when this is done. And we’ve got the flexibility. And we just talked to investors, we’re going to return 18 to $20 billion to capitol to investors over the next three years. That’s something United Technologies aero could not have done because we have been paying down debt. So, I appreciate-- Tom got a great balance sheet. And then one of the real benefits of this deal is that balance sheet with ours gives us a unique flexibility. Not just to turn capitol but to invest in all of these new franchises that Tom is talking about.
JIM CRAMER: You had an interesting couple of conversations with the president when he got elected about Carrier. Kind of aware of where Carrier was going to go.
CARL QUINTANILLA: That feels like a long time ago.
JIM CRAMER: There was some Mexico involved. I mean, it is kind of a, you know, head to head. Now, if he calls you and he says you know I don’t believe for a minute that you’re creating jobs. When these two companies get together, you fire people and you wanted to put jobs in Mexico. So, I don’t know about you. What do you say to him?
GREG HAYES: I am going to tell the President that we’re going to -- we have year to date hired 5500 people, we are going to hire more 10,000 people in the U.S. this year. Tom’s going to hire--
TOM KENNEDY: I’m going to hire 10,000.
GREG HAYES: 20,000 jobs.
JIM CRAMER: Where are you going to find all those engineers? You have 50, going to 60. Do we produce enough engineers in this country?
TOM KENNEDY: No, we don’t produce enough engineers in this country. We need to have more of our folks going into STEM-related careers, and producer more engineers. And, the bottom line is the jobs are there, but we’ve got to get our kids going into STEM-related activities so we can--
JIM CRAMER: He never talks about it because he’s too humble and it drives me crazy. How many people have you put through college?
GREG HAYES: 38,000 people. Spent $102 billion on our employee scholar program. It gets --
JIM CRAMER: Anybody out in the government put more people through college?
GREG HAYES: No sir.
JIM CRAMER: Will you please talk about that.
CARL QUINTANILLA: One last thing. Do you think of this deals as another nail in the coffin of the traditional conglomerate? We’ve talked about this in the past.
GREG HAYES: Look, when we talk about a focused A&D company, which is what we are. We are big, but we are not a conglomerate. And I think again, we are going to be focused on these core markets in the A&D space. And I think that’s the important part to remember. We are not a conglomerate, we are focused on aerospace and defense, our core markets.
JIM CRAMER: Alright. From what it says, Carl, I have to tell you I think this combination is brilliant..