Peerless Systems (PRLS) is my Pick to Click
To summarize the characteristics of Peerless Systems, it would be something like this.
- Generates positive free cash flow
- Has 90% margins
- No debt
- Buying backs shares like there is no tomorrow
- Trades at less than its NCAV
- CEO was previously a value fund manager and owns 20%
- Its licensing business will wind down sooner than later resulting in no revenues
- Looking to change the business into a closed end investment management
- Investment in a public micro cap not working out well
Let me show it another way.
PRLS Profitable Net Net
Peerless Systems is a net net selling below both NCAV and NNWC.
- NCAV is $4.58. The current price is an 18% discount to NCAV.
- NNWC is $4.30. 12% discount to NNWC.
Extremely cheap in terms of valuation.
Why is Peerless Systems So Cheap?
Everything becomes cheap for a reason.
Peerless generates revenue by licensing its technology for imaging solutions in the digital image space. Manufacturers of printers, photocopiers, scanners and other digital image OEM’s have to pay Peerless.
The problem is that the printer business has been in decline for a while. People just don’t print as much as they used to. It’s easier than ever to store documents digitally and to share with others online.
Multifunction printers were hot several years ago, but the industry has been consolidating and Peerless understood that it didn’t stand a chance competing against OEM’s directly and with cheaper labor overseas. In 2008, Peerless sold the majority of their technologies and has been milking the last few remaining licenses it holds.
There is no growth prospect and the core operation is going to become obsolete.
But that also brings opportunity.
Is there Any Upside with Peerless Systems?
It’s not the typical 100%+ upside that many net nets offer.
For a company in decline, the last quarter saw revenues increase by 79%. Yes it’s just one quarter and yes the numbers are small ($0.6m to $1.1m) so it’s easy to dismiss it. However consider the way Peerless Systems sells its licenses.
Most of the revenue until now came from selling block licenses. A block license is where you are given a set quantity of licenses to use. E.g if you buy Microsoft Office, you can only install the software onto one machine. If you want to install it on 10 computers, you need to buy a bigger, more expensive license.
In the recent quarter, some accounts have moved to a pay per unit license agreement.
This is good and bad.
Good because single licenses are more expensive and brings in higher revenue. Thus the 79% increase in revenue compared to the last comparable quarter.
Bad because customers are not committing long term.
Because the company has eliminated expenses down to $0.3m, most of the money from revenue will drop to FCF. If more customers switch from the block license commitment to paying per unit, the short term will see some good FCF generation. This gives Peerless even more time to find the best use for their cash and to turn their business in another direction because at the moment, cash burn is a surplus.
I’ll get to valuation later.
How Can I Lose Money?
Before discussing what Peerless is worth, or what it isn’t, I want to focus on the downside.
Protect the downside and the upside will take care of itself.
Can you lose money with Peerless? Of course.
This investment is a bust if Peerless burns through its cash and there are 3 main ways that Peerless Systems “burns” cash.
- Cost of staying public – approx $100k a year for auditing and tax fees.
- CEO compensation – $445k in 2013, $653k in 2012.
- Loss on its stock investments – All of its marketable securities (which is 11% of cash and equivalents) are held in a microcap called Moduslink (MLNK)
Peerless Systems will likely keep all three so that means the real cash burn is going to be in the range of $500k – 800k a year. The market value of the stock is a non realized amount so it isn’t a cash burn. I will ignore it in this scenario.
If Peerless did absolutely nothing, the cash burn will be around 800k at the upper range. With a current cash balance of $10m, Peerless could technically stay afloat for 12 years. Being able to survive for 12 years on breadcrumbs may sound impressive, but remember that in such a situation, every passing year will see its value decrease.
That’s how you can lose with Peerless. It all comes down to how the cash will be used.
Value Investor CEO in Charge
No big progress has occurred since the sale of its licenses in 2008, but the CEO is on the shareholders side.
Timothy Brog is a former value fund manager and owns 20% of the company. His interests are definitely aligned and his strategy has been to reduce expenses and increase shareholder value.
Peerless Systems Share Buybacks
- 2009 shares outstanding: 17.7m
- Current shares outstanding: 3m
With the low liquidity, about 10% of the shares are being bought back each quarter in the mid $3 range, well below book value and NCAV.
In an attempt to make something out of the company, Peerless is also transforming the business into a closed end fund.
in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we determined to attempt to transition our primary business to the asset management industry. In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, Peerless Value Opportunity Fund (“PVOF”) filed a registration statement to conduct an initial public offering of its common shares. Locksmith Capital Advisors (“LCA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Peerless, has entered into a management agreement with PVOF to act as its investment advisor.
It will likely be focused on small value plays such as ModusLink. The only thing is that ModusLink doesn’t seem to be working out well so far. As with all investments, a year or two is too early to judge an investment so I won’t conclude anything about the MLNK investment yet.
We continued to hold a significant investment in ModusLink during fiscal 2013. ModusLink experienced a number of disruptive events during the year, including a review of strategic alternatives which had no positive results, an inquiry from the SEC, an internal investigation which determined that certain client contracts had not been “properly aligned with best corporate practices,” a delay in filing various periodic reports with the SEC, a restatement of prior financial statements, various letters from NASDAQ notifying ModusLink of its noncompliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) due to the company’s delayed filing of its periodic reports, and