Home Politics National Center for Lesbian Rights Files Friend-of-the-Court Brief

National Center for Lesbian Rights Files Friend-of-the-Court Brief

When you purchase through our sponsored links, we may earn a commission. By using this website you agree to our T&Cs.

National Center for Lesbian Rights Files Friend-of-the-Court Brief in Major Abortion Rights Case

NCLR leads coalition of 24 LGBTQ organizations urging Supreme Court to strike down unconstitutional abortion law in Louisiana

Know more about Russia than your friends:

Get our free ebook on how the Soviet Union became Putin's Russia.

Q3 2019 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) filed a friend-of-the-court (amicus) brief in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of 24 national LGBTQ organizations in the case June Medical Services v. Gee. The case involves a challenge to a law in Louisiana that would force all but one abortion clinic in that state to close, a law that is virtually identical to one in Texas that the Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional just three years ago in the landmark case Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt.

The brief, filed by NCLR and fellow LGBTQ organizations, urges the Court to consider the broader impact of allowing states to force the closure of abortion clinics for unjustified reasons. Many reproductive health clinics offer, in addition to abortion care, affirming health care services vital to the LGBTQ community, including primary care and hormone therapy for transgender people. These health clinic services help to address health disparities experienced by LGBTQ people caused by still-pervasive discrimination in the health care system.

Also outlined in the brief is the disturbing parallel between states seeking to evade the Supreme Court’s marriage equality ruling and those looking to get around the 2016 Whole Woman’s Health decision that reaffirmed the right to abortion.

Abortion and lesbian rights

In Pavan v. Smith, a case brought by NCLR and GLBTQ Advocates and Defenders (GLAD), the Supreme Court in 2017 summarily reversed an Arkansas Supreme Court decision that blatantly ignored Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court decision affirming marriage equality nationwide. Arkansas had refused to put the names of both parents on a child’s birth certificate if the parents were of the same sex, in direct violation of Obergefell’s holding that states must grant to same-sex married couples all of the rights, benefits, and responsibilities afforded to different-sex couples. The Supreme Court refused then to allow the state to flout its ruling, and it should do the same here.

NCLR Federal Policy Director Julianna Gonen issued the following statement: “The struggles for LGBTQ equality and reproductive freedom are inextricably linked. All people should be able to determine for themselves whom to marry, to live in accordance with their gender identity, and to decide whether and when to bear children.

These core freedoms, recognized by the Supreme Court as guaranteed by our Constitution, cannot be taken from us by state legislatures seeking to return us to the dark days of illegal abortion and LGBTQ people confined to the closet. The Court should tell Louisiana, and other states that might seek to follow its example, in no uncertain terms that it meant what it said in Whole Woman’s Health, just as it meant what it said in Obergefell. When states fail in their attempts to strip fundamental rights from their citizens, they should not get a do-over.”


Our Editorial Standards

At ValueWalk, we’re committed to providing accurate, research-backed information. Our editors go above and beyond to ensure our content is trustworthy and transparent.

Anna Peel

Want Financial Guidance Sent Straight to You?

  • Pop your email in the box, and you'll receive bi-weekly emails from ValueWalk.
  • We never send spam — only the latest financial news and guides to help you take charge of your financial future.