Business

Active vs. Passive – Astoria Portfolio Advisors

“When you get too far off course, your internal compass tells you something is wrong and you need to reorient yourself. It requires courage and resolve to resist the constant pressure and expectations confronting you and to take corrective action when necessary” – Bill George, Discover your True North, 2015, John Wiley & Sons.

Get Our Activist Investing Case Study!

Get the entire 10-part series on our in-depth study on activist investing in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or print it out to read anywhere! Sign up below!

Also read:

 

  • My colleagues and friends tell me that this topic is constantly in the press.

 

  • I don’t read daily newsletters or watch the news. Astoria uses a disciplined cross-asset quantitative investment process. We have models, study our indicators, watch for signals, focus on the big picture, and then model accordingly with a long-term time horizon. Focusing on daily price action or reading daily articles would create noise for our models.

 

  • However, given my background in Equity Derivatives Research where I wrote Index and ETF research back in 2000, I would be remissed not to comment on the Active vs. Passive topic given Astoria straddles both sides.

 

  • I have written, discussed, and presented on this topic throughout my career. Frankly, it has become quite a tiring topic at this point. All portfolios contain active components (although investors probably never realized it). The minute you open your portfolio, decide what to put in it, and decide how much weight you will give an asset class, it becomes an active decision. Period.

 

  • The cynical side of me says that this ultimately comes down to cost which is a shame. On a 1-2 year time period 50-100bps shouldn’t drive your decision to shift from active to passive. I am worried that investors are making these shifts at the wrong part of the cycle.

 

  • While we firmly believe in using very low-cost ETFs in our retirement Model Portfolios given the extended time horizon, our Multi-Asset Risk Allocation & Risk Managed Dynamic Income Model Portfolios are open architecture and we use some ETFs with high management fees because it’s the right solution for our clients.

 

  • We have been in a QE induced bull market for most of this post credit crisis period which ironically most investors missed as we will discuss later in this piece. Now is when you want active management.

 

  • In fact, Astoria has been arguing that the current environment is ideal for active management for these reasons:
  1. The Fed has shifted away from monetary policy and has begun a tightening cycle.
  2. The S&P 500 is up 350% since 2009. We are in the latter stages of the economic cycle and as mentioned, active tends to work better during down cycles.
  3. Dispersion amongst sectors has risen and has created opportunities for active managers. The difference between S&P 500 Technology vs. Energy sector year to date is 35%.
  4. Global cross asset correlations are at very attractive levels. In fact, they have declined of late. Wait a minute, I thought all those massive ETF inflows were going to increase correlations and make it difficult to pick stocks?
  • What do you see from the chart below that would suggest the $1 trillion of inflows into ETFs in the past 4-5 years are having a disproportionate impact from a correlation perspective? So much for that theory.

Global Cross Asset Correlations Decline in Recent Months Despite Huge Inflows into Passive Strategies

Active vs. Passive

  • Ultimately, ETFs have become one of the most successful products in financial history in a very short time period and this is partly why it receives a lot of pushback. This is no different from other successful products. Futures received quite a bit of pushback when they gained momentum and now many institutional managers utilize them. The same story applies for options.

 

  • At the end of day, there’s $4 trillion in ETFs and $15 trillion in mutual funds globally. Have ETFs impacted the investment landscape and impacted capital markets? Yes. But in our view, we have a long way to go before they dominate the marketplace.

Macro Views

  • The pro-growth, cyclical recovery thesis that Astoria have been arguing for some time continues to play out. The MSCI ACWI index was up 2.8% in July and is up 15.4% YTD. Earnings revision breath remains upward trending in the US, Europe, Japan, and EM.

 

  • The environment for cyclical equities is as good as it has been in several years. Global growth remains solid and supports a pro cyclical bias (EM & DM over US, EM debt over US credit, value over growth, equity risk over yield & carry) in our view. Moreover, realized inflation remains weak enough globally to keep central banks from tightening policy too aggressively. What more can you ask for from an equity market’s perspective?

 

  • Are there risks in the marketplace? Of course, there always are. It’s all about the distribution of outcomes and modeling it accordingly. Astoria thinks the risk reward is attractive until either (1) inflation picks up (2) Fed talks up rate hikes (3) Central Banks overseas materially slow their accommodation. However, this is not our base case in the short term.

 

 

  • We would argue against that thesis.
  1. A lot of the indictors we examine still point to an economy that is expanding and very healthy. The economic recovery is global in nature with earnings inflecting higher across the world. For the first time since Q4 2011, earnings have been simultaneously growing on a year on year basis at the MSCI US, EMU, EM, World, and AC World level.
  2. Granted some macro data has moderated of late but many remain very elevated compared to recent history. Importantly, the Fed remains largely accommodative and central banks overseas remain very supportive. Equities continue to remain attractive in the content of low interest rate, loose financial conditions, and a supportive economic backdrop.
  3. Until the US yield curve inverts (usually the kiss of death for equities), Astoria thinks the risk reward of staying long pro-growth, cyclical equities remain attractive.
  4. Astoria believes it’s highly unlikely that International Small Caps and EM equities would be up 20-25% if we were experiencing a deflationary scare. Admittedly, there are some sizeable flattener positions that have been put on when examining CFTC futures data. However, we are focusing on our suite macroeconomic indicators instead of obsessing over 1 positioning data point.
  • What’s the biggest story of 2017? We have no quantitative way to show this but we would venture and say a good chunk of investors would argue that Trump’s inability to get legislation passed would be at or near the top of the list. However, from an equity shareholder perspective the bigger story for 2017 is Emerging Markets and International Small Caps which are this year’s market leaders.

 

  • Remember, Small Caps are plays on local economies. If economies around the world weren’t expanding, it would be hard to see Small Caps up 20-25%.

 

  • The Fed will continue to emphasize normalization but the real risk is whether we get a 3rd rate hike in 2017 and Yellen’s job next year. The balance sheet reduction has been talked about quite a bit and is likely in the price. Astoria believes the Fed will announce normalization plans in September, see how financial conditions respond (US dollar, rates, equities, volatility) in October and November before deciding whether to hike in December.

 

  • The market is skeptical of further rate hikes. The implied rate hikes in the next 12 months has consistently fallen all year and currently resides around 1.2. The bottom line is that investors don’t believe in inflation materializing or the Fed’s ability to hike rates.

 

  • The Fed has consistently sided with the market’s rate hike expectation throughout this cycle. 2016 was a classic example when they were implying 4 rate hikes at the start of the year and ultimately caved in their dot plots. It was risk on for the rest of 2016. Under this Fed administration, we think the probability of the Fed going against the market’s expectation is low. And as mentioned, the real risk is likely who becomes the next Fed chairperson.

 

  • When you factor in muted inflation globally, the probability of more aggressive tightening lowers. For us, this is an attractive scenario for pro-growth, cyclical equities but we are monitoring these probabilities closely.

 

  • We commented on EM equities and FX in our last Macro Insights so we won’t delve further here. A few thoughts on why we believe Japan has several tailwinds.
  1. Global growth is increasing and Japanese large caps by design are a play on the rest of the world. In case you are wondering how the local Japanese economy was doing, Japanese Small Caps are up 20% this year.
  2. Margin of safety: Japan is trading at 20% discount to US on a 12-month forward PE basis.
  3. Japanese earnings growth is projected to hit a 3-year high.
  4. The BOJ is still very accommodative and remains much further behind the US from a tightening standpoint.

US Earnings

  • To be clear, Astoria own US equities in our various Model Portfolios but in our view the risk reward is relatively more attractive overseas. However, we acknowledge that there are some strong tailwinds for US equities.
  1. There is very little priced in from a Trump perspective. US Small Caps are up only 4% YTD. When the probability of US legislation increases, the gap between US and International Small Caps (+20%) should narrow.
  2. The significant dollar selloff will kick in for US multinational earnings which dominate the S&P 500. Another tailwind.
  3. he bears will argue that the rate of change for Q2 earnings season is below Q1’s stellar performance. Don’t forget that for most of 2015 when we were witnessing a deflationary scare due to the bear market in oil/energy sector that S&P 500 earnings were negative. So even though Q2’s rate of change is lower than Q1’s, it still is elevated and one of the reasons why US equities are rallying.
  • Year to Date, US Fixed Income ETFs and Mutual Funds have seen approximately $100 bln more inflows compared to US equity strategies. Geez, despite S&P 500’s +12% YTD gain, US equities can’t catch a break.

 

  • When you dig deeper, this trend of dominate inflows into Fixed Income has been a consistent over the past decade. Since ‘07 there has been approximately +$1.5 trillion into bond strategies and $200 bln outflows from equities. This speaks to the most hated bull market ever thesis and another reason why the US keeps rallying.

 

  • Lastly, we wanted to point out 2 things:
  1. Here is an interview Astoria recently did with ETF.com about our investment process. http://www.etf.com/sections/features-and-news/why-model-etf-portfolios-need-activemgmt?nopaging=1
  2. Here is a link to a podcast that Astoria recently participated with Jeremy Schwartz, Director of Research from Wisdom Tree and Pankaj Patel, Head of Quantitative Research at Cirrus Research.https://soundcloud.com/user-20931378/behind-the-markets-podcast-john-davi-pankaj-patel

Best,

John Davi, Founder & CIO of Astoria Portfolio Advisors LLC.

See the full PDF below.