Apple Inc. Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Employee Bag Searches

iphone 8 apple stockElisaRiva / Pixabay

Apple Store employees filed the suit against Apple claiming compensation for time spent having their bags searched at the end of their shifts.

The lawsuit related to bag searches at 52 Apple retail locations in California, and it has now been certified as a class-action by U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco, writes Dan Levine for Reuters.

Employees had made complaints to Apple CEO Tim Cook

Judge Alsup made the ruling on Thursday as part of a case in which employees are seeking compensation for the time taken to perform the bag searches, which are used to prevent theft from Apple Stores.

According to court filings, a number of employees sent emails to Apple CEO Tim Cook to complain about the practice, arguing that it is embarrassing and demeaning for staff to have their bags checked in front of customers.

Class-action lawsuits allow plaintiffs to present their case as a group, and usually afford them a stronger position when it comes to negotiating a settlement. As a result of the ruling, Apple is now facing a lawsuit from over 12,000 current and former employees.

A spokesperson for the company did not comment on the ruling.

Current and former employees can now seek compensation

According to plaintiffs Amanda Frlekin and Dean Pelle, the “screenings” are undertaken each time Apple Store employees leave the store, including for breaks. Lawsuits from inside Apple staff are very uncommon.

One unidentified worker wrote to Cook in 2012, telling him that the policy on bag searches mean Apple managers “are required to treat ‘valued’ employees as criminals.”

Cook then passed the message on to retail and human resources executives, asking them” “is this true?” Details of the responses that he received were not included in the court filing.

The iPhone manufacturer attempted to stop the case being made a class-action, arguing that not all store managers performed screenings, and that when searches did occur, they took so little time that compensation was not necessary.

The plaintiffs allege that bag searches often added 10-15 minutes to their shifts, which went unpaid.

Judge Alsup told the company that those arguments would be heard during the trial.

For exclusive info on hedge funds and the latest news from value investing world at only a few dollars a month check out ValueWalk Premium right here.

Multiple people interested? Check out our new corporate plan right here (We are currently offering a major discount)



About the Author

Brendan Byrne
While studying economics, Brendan found himself comfortably falling down the rabbit hole of restaurant work, ultimately opening a consulting business and working as a private wine buyer. On a whim, he moved to China, and in his first week following a triumphant pub quiz victory, he found himself bleeding on the floor based on his arrogance. The same man who put him there offered him a job lecturing for the University of Wales in various sister universities throughout the Middle Kingdom. While primarily lecturing in descriptive and comparative statistics, Brendan simultaneously earned an Msc in Banking and International Finance from the University of Wales-Bangor. He's presently doing something he hates, respecting French people. Well, two, his wife and her mother in the lovely town of Antigua, Guatemala. To contact Brendan or give him an exclusive, please contact him at theflask@gmail.com

2 Comments on "Apple Inc. Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Employee Bag Searches"

  1. Well if inventory shows loss of product what else can they do? CNN says Apple is poised to profit 53,000,000,000.00 dollars this year which is a record breaking event for a corporation. Does this mean sell your other stock and buy Apple?

  2. Absolutely will lose. This is a practice in retail for the last 50 years. Many stores require transparent handbags “inside” the store; and lockers are provided.
    Employee theft is the biggest shrinkage issue at retail; not consumer theft.
    Interesting that the suit is for “time”. Because they know they have no case on search.
    But it’s part of the job. Like it or leave it. But shut up and thank Tim for your job & benefits.
    Oh….and report the thieves!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.