Ten Myths About Momentum Investing, Squashed by Tim du Toit, Quant Investing
If you think share price momentum (also called Price Index) is something only traders use and is of no interest to long-term investors (including value investors) then you will definitely find this article of value.
In May 2014 Clifford Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Ronen Israel , (all from ARQ Capital Management) and Tobias Moskowitz from the University of Chicago published a very interesting paper called Fact, Fiction and Momentum Investing.
Momentum 20 years old
Mangrove Partners Narrowly Avoids “Extinction-Level Event”
Nathaniel August's Mangrove Partners is having a rough 2020. According to a copy of the hedge fund's August update, a copy of which ValueWalk has been able to review, for the year to August 5, Mangrove Funds have returned -38%. Over the trailing 12-month period, the funds returned -44%. The S&P 500 produced a positive Read More
The paper clarifies, using already published research studies, the myths that have developed around the concept of momentum since it was first written about in 1993, more than 20 years ago.
What is momentum?
Momentum is the observation that share prices which have performed well (increased more) relative to other share prices (peers) on average continue to outperform, and that prices that have performed relatively poorly (decreased more) tend to continue to underperform.
The word relative is crucial as momentum is calculated by ranking a company’s share price movement against other companies.
For example if you look at 12 months momentum the share with highest (or best) momentum is the one with the largest share price increase over 12 months.
How is it calculated?
The screener has momentum (or price index) available on all companies from 1 to 60 months for you to use when looking for investment ideas.
Momentum is not trend following
Momentum is often confused with trend following. But trend following is something completely different as shown in the following table.
Momentum: History, Data and Methodology
Momentum has been a viable investment strategy for:
- US equities for more than 212 years (data since 1802).
- It has also been shown to work in 40 other countries
- More than a dozen other asset classes like bonds, currencies, commodities and others.
Myths about Momentum Investing
Myth no. 1: Momentum returns are small and sporadic
To see if this myth is true, the authors compared it to the following investment strategies:
- RMRF: Equity Risk Premium or the aggregate equity returns minus the risk free rate. This is the percentage the stock market outperformed cash.
- SMB: (Small minus Big portfolio) buy small stocks and sell large stocks, – capture the size effect.
- HML: (High minus Low portfolio) buy high book-to-price (same as low price to book) stocks and sell low book-to-price stocks, represents value.
- UMD: (Up Minus Down portfolio) buy stocks that have high relative one year performance and sell stocks that have low relative one year performance, captures momentum.
The table below shows the return of size, value and momentum strategies. It also shows the Sharpe ratios, a ratio that calculates the performance of an investment by adjusting for its risk.
When comparing the return of different investment strategies the one with a higher Sharpe ratio gives you a better risk adjusted return.
Across all three time periods, momentum (UMD) outperformed value (HML) and size (SMB) strategies. Momentum does have higher volatility, but if you look at the risk adjusted returns (Sharpe Ratios), momentum was still the best strategy.
Momentum is not sporadic
The table below shows you if returns from momentum investing are sporadic or not. The table shows the percentage of times each strategy generates positive returns (i.e., the longs beat the shorts, so for value this is how often the cheap stocks beat the expensive stocks, for momentum it’s how often winners beat losers)
Over the 36 year period (1927-1963), of you look at 1 year rolling period, momentum is the most consistent, with positive returns 81% of the time as opposed to value, with positive returns 63% of the times.
If you look at 5 year rolling periods over the 36 year period (1927-1963), value (HML) does slightly better than momentum (UMD). In the other time periods, 1963-2013 and 1991-2013, momentum is as good if not better than value and size strategies.
As you can see returns using a momentum investment strategy are not sporadic.
Value and momentum an even better combination
If value and momentum each on their own can give you market beating returns what happens if you combine value and momentum.
The paper also tested a combined value and momentum strategy with the following results:
You can clearly see that the combined portfolio (60% value 40% momentum) produces the highest percentage of positive returns, in both 1 year and 5 year periods with the best risk adjusted return (highest Sharpe ratio).
Myth no.2: Momentum cannot be used by long-only investors as it is a strategy that can only be used by short investors
This myth that momentum can only be help you if you are a short seller just refuses to die, especially amongst value investors.
The paper looked at this and came up with the table below which shows the returns from investing long and short using in a momentum strategy.
As you can see long momentum has returned slightly more than short momentum strategies over long periods of time.
Thus the assertion of momentum only being “short strategy” is simply not true.
Myth no.3: Momentum returns are much larger for small caps than large caps
The table below compares the returns of momentum (UMD) and value (HML) strategies applied to small and large companies.
As you can see momentum returns from large companies are substantial even if they are slightly less than for small companies.
The larger returns for small companies can be due to of higher risk, inefficiencies (information availability) or simply because of larger price movements (volatility).
This is no different than the difference in returns from a value strategy (right part of table). And small companies also returned slightly more than large companies so you can hardly say that small company momentum returns are a lot different.
Myth no. 4: Momentum does not survive or is seriously limited by trading costs
There is no ignoring the fact that momentum is a high turnover strategy (our testing has found six months rebalancing best) compared to other strategies like value investing where you may hold an investments for years.
However the authors used data from AQR Capital, a large institutional investor, to show that for a large institutional investor, the average trading costs for momentum strategies are quite low.
This unfortunately does not help you as a small investor. One way you can overcome the problem is to invest in a fund that use momentum strategies.
Myth no. 5: Momentum does not work for taxable investor
In the paper the authors found that momentum, despite having 5-6 times the turnover of value investing for example, had a similar tax burden if you are a USA tax payer.
This is because:
- Momentum holds onto winners and sells losers quickly. This means that the profits from a momentum investment strategy will be taxed at the lower long term capital gains tax rate (in the USA if you have hold an investment for longer than a year) compared to the higher short term tax rate.
- Momentum stocks generally have lower dividend yield and as you know dividends can be tax inefficient because of higher income tax rates and withholding taxes.
Also if you use a momentum strategy you can sell your losing investments quickly to use the higher short term tax rates and hold winning investments longer to be subjected to the lower long term capital gains tax rate.
Myth no. 6: Momentum is best used with screens rather than as a direct factor
This myth says that momentum is not useful as the only factor you should use to select investments for your portfolio but that it should be used in a screen combining it with other investment strategies, value investing for example.
But if you look at the above mentioned results of a pure momentum strategy you will agree that momentum, used as the only factor to put your portfolio together, is of great value.
And if you do not use momentum (only value investing for example) I suggest you take a look at the paper Quantitative Value Investing in Europe: What Works for Achieving Alpha where you will find a wealth of data to prove that you are missing out on substantial gains if you ignore momentum in your investment decisions.
Myth no. 7: You should be particularly worried about momentum’s returns disappearing
Like the previous myth, this myth accepts the value of momentum as an investment strategy but says that the strategy would not work over long periods of time.
To bust this myth you only need to look at the long term track record of momentum (going back 212 years), as well as the evidence that it also works across different equity markets and asset classes to realize that momentum has worked for a very long time.
Momentum new to the academic world
A reason this myth got started is that momentum is a “newer” investment strategy tested in academic studies.
It is however possible for momentum strategies to have low returns from time to time, this is true of all investment strategies.
High returns lead to low returns
As you know when an investment strategy has achieved high returns it attracts a lot of new investors which results in the companies the strategy selects becoming fully valued. This then leads to lower or negative returns which in turn cause investors to abandon the strategy causing prices to fall which leads to the strategy starting to work again.
Myth no. 8: Momentum is too volatile to rely on
The authors agree that momentum is indeed more volatile than some other strategies.
However as you saw momentum generated higher risk adjusted returns (higher Sharpe ratio) than value or size strategies.
To compensate for the high volatility the authors suggest combining momentum with value investing so that your portfolio will do better should the market decline substantially. This will help you to better withstand downturns in either value investment and momentum strategies.
For example it would have helped you when in 1999 (Internet bubble) when value performed terribly and in 2009 (financial crisis) when momentum performed terribly.
Myth no. 9: Different measures of momentum can give different results over a given period!
This is true, but this is also true for any other investment strategy. Different value strategies, for example price to book compared to price to earnings or earnings yield all would have given you different returns over the same time period.
There are also different ways to measure momentum. The most widely used momentum measurement uses the past 12 month data to find the relative winners and loser, but removes the most recent month to avoid liquidity and market structure issues.
Other measures of momentum uses different time periods ranging from 3 to 12 months, consistency of past returns or measures of fundamental momentum related to earnings announcement returns or analyst revisions.
In a 2013 research paper titled The Other Side of Value: The Gross Pro?tability Premium Robert Novy-Marx suggests that momentum in the US markets is best measures using the past 7 to 12 months, and Goyal and Wahal in a 2012 paper titled Is Momentum an Echo? also found that in 35 (non US) markets past 12 months the best period to measure momentum over.
Myth no. 10: There is no theory behind momentum
Most theories that try to explain momentum fall into two categories; risk based and behaviour based.
Risk based explanations argue that momentum gives higher returns because of higher risk. Companies with higher momentum face greater future cash flow risk because of their growth prospects or have a higher discount rate due of their investment opportunities causing them to have a higher cost of capital.
Behaviour based explanations argue that momentum is either an under reaction or a delayed reaction (OR an overreaction or a hasty reaction) to news or events.
I am sure you also don’t care if there is a correct explanation as long as momentum works and you can use it to generate higher returns.
The paper has convincingly shown that momentum has worked for a long time, across different markets and asset classes which mean it is a worthwhile factor to incorporate into your investment strategy.
Even though I was a classic value investor (a share price could not fall enough) after spending months doing research for the paper Quantitative Value Investing in Europe: What Works for Achieving Alpha I have become convinced about the value of adding momentum to your investment strategy.
Best investment strategies
You can find information on the best strategies we have tested and all of them use momentum here: Quant Investing best strategies
Your momentum analyst
Tim du Toit