Apple Inc. (AAPL): Samsung’s Infringement Damaged Marketing

iphone 8 apple stockElisaRiva / Pixabay

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) management turned on the tears, so to speak, as the retrial on damages continued today. At issue is just how much Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (LON:BC94) (KRX:005930) should have to pay Apple for infringing upon its patents. The trial has been going on for most of the week. Shara Tibken of CNET provided an update today.

Apple blames Samsung for questions about its design abilities

Phil Schiller, who heads up Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)’s marketing department, said in court today the fact that Samsung’s devices looked so much like the iPhone made it too difficult for the company to differentiate its products from others. As a result, he said it became more difficult to sell the company’s devices, particularly to new customers.

The executive also emphasized that their marketing strategy had been to make the product the hero and show off capabilities and features which set Apple’s products apart from others. However, Schiller claims Samsung’s infringing devices caused customers to question the company’s “design skills in a way they never used to.”

Apple damaged by Samsung’s copying of features

He also said that copying just one of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)’s features was just as bad for it as copying 50 of them. He said Apple’s whole business is built around creating features and designs that set it apart from others. According to Schiller, the reason Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (LON:BC94) (KRX:005930) was able to grab such a big chunk of the smartphone market was because it copied Apple. He also said Samsung’s copying of Apple was why it did so much better than the makers of other Android devices.

Apple’s retrial continues

Today was the fourth day of a retrial for damages. Samsung had been ordered to pay Apple about $1 billion in damages for infringing on its patents, but in March, a judge vacated approximately $450 million of that amount. She said the jury did not calculate the proper amount. Samsung will still have to pay the roughly $600 million left on the original damages award. This retrial is about how much more the company will have to pay on top of it.

For exclusive info on hedge funds and the latest news from value investing world at only a few dollars a month check out ValueWalk Premium right here.

Multiple people interested? Check out our new corporate plan right here (We are currently offering a major discount)

About the Author

Michelle Jones
Michelle Jones was a television news producer for eight years. She produced the morning news programs for the NBC affiliates in Evansville, Indiana and Huntsville, Alabama and spent a short time at the CBS affiliate in Huntsville. She has experience as a writer and public relations expert for a wide variety of businesses. Michelle has been with ValueWalk since 2012 and is now our editor-in-chief. Email her at [email protected]

Be the first to comment on "Apple Inc. (AAPL): Samsung’s Infringement Damaged Marketing"

Leave a comment