From a reader, ptuomov:
If you run a regression of the magenta line on variables that have similar trends, you will get a spuriously high R2. I think you should try to explain the weekly changes in the magenta series instead. (I may have misunderstood you regression, in which case please show the actual data series in the regression so I’ll understand it better.)
Um, that’s not always true. I did not get a Ph. D., but I passed my Ph. D. field in econometrics, including passing the oral exam. I try to be really careful with regressions, unlike most. I avoid multiple passes over the data, and I avoid “specification searches,” which are glorified hunts for correlations.
How Warren Buffett Uses Discount Rates To Value Stocks
Warren Buffett has never detailed the process he uses to value the businesses he acquires for Berkshire Hathaway. However, over the years, he has provided some limited insight into his methods. Q3 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Based on these comments, it is widely assumed that Buffett uses a discount cash flow model Read More
As it is, the regressors that I used are not highly correlated with each other. They don’t have similar trends. Here is the correlation matrix:
The regressors were very different variables, and were independently useful for deciphering the relationship. Had it been otherwise, the t-coefficients would have weak, with the F-coefficient strong. As it was, the t-coefficients were all strong.
This is not spurious.