QE2 Creates Oppurtunities for Contrarian Value Investing

QE2 Creates Oppurtunities for Contrarian Value Investing

As always, John Hussman’s weekly market comment is a must read. In it he discusses what he sees as the driver of returns since QE2 was announced (essentially a transient psychological effect), the asset classes that have benefited and current valuation levels. All three areas are worthy of reading and further introspection but I will focus on the second.

As someone who usually approaches investing from a contrarian value standpoint I found the following analysis extremely useful as I position my investments for 2011.

Voss Capital is tapping into the affordable housing shortage

HousingThe Voss Value Fund was up 11.6% for the second quarter, while the Voss Value Offshore fund gained 11.2% net. The Russell 2000 returned 4.3%, while the Russell 2000 Value gained 4.2%, and the S&P 500 was up 8.5%. Q2 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Year to date, the Voss Value Fund is Read More

Ned Davis Research tracks a set of “factor attribution” portfolios, which measure the performance between the top 10% of stocks ranked by a given factor, and the bottom 10% of stocks as ranked by that factor. The factors are things like market beta, dividend yield, 26-week momentum, and so forth. Essentially, the these factor portfolios track the return of hypothetical portfolios that are long the top 10% and short the bottom 10% of stocks based on any given variable.

The performance of these 133 factor portfolios over the past 13 weeks offers tremendous insight into the extent to which the Federal Reserve has encouraged speculative risk. Investors are chasing stocks with the greatest exposure to market fluctuations, commodities, credit risk, small-cap risk and volatility. Conversely, securities demonstrating reasonable valuation, stability, quality, or payout have been virtually abandoned by investors. Here is a sampling (emphasis mine):

Market Beta Risk 17.80%
Raw Materials Beta Commodity Sensitivity 17.47%
Credit Spread Beta Macro Economic Sensitivity 14.66%
Small vs. Large Beta Style Sensitivity 12.54%
Silver Beta Commodity Sensitivity 10.87%
Sigma Risk (Volatility) Risk 10.73%
Operating Cash Flow Yield Valuation -4.02%
EPS Stability Quality -5.56%
Value vs. Growth Beta Style Sensitivity -5.87%
Return on Invested Capital Profitability -6.61%
Dividend Yield Valuation -9.34%
10-Year T-Note Beta Macro Economic Sensitivity -9.55%
High vs. Low Quality Beta Style Sensitivity -15.70%

The problem with this outcome is that the speculative factors being rewarded over the short-term have nothing to do with the characteristics that have historically been rewarded over the long-term. Despite various periods where valuation is out-of-favor, value has been the clear winner over time. Moreover, it has been destructive to discard valuation in preference for chasing momentum and relative strength after the fact. In contrast, chasing high beta or momentum has conferred no durable benefit for investors. Here is a sampling of 10-year factor returns:

Operating Cash Flow Yield Valuation 20.26%
Sales / Price Valuation 19.68%
Market Cap Liquidity and Size 19.10%
EBIT / Enterprise Value Valuation 15.00%
Free Cash Flow / Enterprise Value Valuation 10.49%
Market Beta Risk 1.55%
Silver Beta Commodity Sensitivity -1.04%
Relative Strength Risk -7.49%
26-Week RSI Trend -15.46%
26-Week Momentum Momentum -15.99%
52-Week Stochastics Momentum -23.79%

Essentially,the QE2 rally has been one of high beta, cyclical and smaller names with valuation, quality and profitability strategies under-performing. However, over time the valuation focused factors have performed favorably.

Contrarians take note; high quality, value based strategies should be priced to outperform their lower quality and higher beta brethren.

No posts to display