You have direct control in determining the future of your investment in Omega Protein Corporation. Your vote in the ongoing proxy contest waged against Omega Protein by a single self-interested stockholder, Wynnefield Capital Management, will have significant impact on the future of your Company.
Board Consistently Acts to Generate Long-Term Stockholder Value
In our view, the choice is simple. We think the following three core attributes of your Board underscore our commitment to generating long-term value and our ability to protect the interests of all stockholders.
1. Clear Plan to Create Value – Your Board has implemented a clear plan to seize on macroeconomic trends to drive value creation. We have done this by strategically building a stronger and balanced nutrition company serving a broader range of customer segments.
2. Proven Willingness to Explore All Alternatives – Your Board has consistently demonstrated a willingness to explore all options to drive stockholder value. Last year, the Board conducted a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives with the assistance of J.P. Morgan – a leading, globally recognized financial advisor. After careful consideration, in consultation with J.P. Morgan, the Board determined that the continued execution of the Company’s strategy combined with the focus on growth and efficiency underway currently represents the best path to maximize value for stockholders. Nonetheless, your Board always remains willing to evaluate options that may drive additional stockholder value – and indeed has done so recently.
[drizzle]3. Independently Welcomes Fresh Voices – Your Board routinely brings on new, fresh voices to encourage a robust dialogue in the boardroom and ensure stockholders are always being appropriately represented. Consistent with this commitment, we added Steve Bryan and Gary Ermers to the Board in 2014. They bring specific experiences to add value to the Board’s efforts to drive stockholder value. This year, after interviewing several candidates, we nominated David Clarke, a seasoned executive in our industry, who was proposed by Wynnefield. If Mr. Clarke is elected, the Board has refreshed seven members of our eight-member Board in the last six years.
We value the constructive input of all investors of the Company. This is why we have consistently met with and sought to work productively with Wynnefield.
In fact, your Board interviewed and carefully evaluated all of Wynnefield’s nominees as well as other candidates through the established vetting process of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Following this review, your Board, recognizing the clear value of Mr. Clarke’s experience, decided to nominate him to join the Board.
In short, regardless of Wynnefield’s outlandish rhetoric, we never lost sight of the importance of acting in stockholders’ best interests. We, therefore, remain steadfast in our focus on making the right decisions to drive stockholder value.
The Unprofessional Behavior of Wynnefield’s Principal, Nelson Obus, Makes us Question Wynnefield’s Judgment
We think it is important for stockholders to understand the erratic and unprofessional nature of Wynnefield’s campaign, led by its co-managing member, Nelson Obus. Mr. Obus has sent numerous emails, often sent in the middle of the night, to Bret Scholtes, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and Omega Protein’s outside counsel, with insults and threats. Below are representative examples:
- “You are on the verge of really crossing me !!! because unlike almost all other activist situations Wynnefield has become involved with the path forward for you and your Board is so obvious. I’m also a great vote counter and you have about as much chance being successful in an expensive proxy battle as you do in being chosen as the next Pope.”
- “I had a dream!! You were in Berlin..wearing a Sandwich Board that read. ‘OME for sale @ 8X TTM EBITDA.. Human Nutrition Company thrown in for Free’
- “My first take @ the proposal. It’s the best joke I’ve heard in months. You need to step up here and enter what is loosely referred to as the world of reality.” [NOTE: In response to Omega’s settlement proposal to add David Clarke to the Board.]
- “You guys are such schmucks… I remain furious about the way you and your Board dealt with my proposal.. You appear to be self dealing idiots and will remain so until you prove me wrong!!”
- “I’m certain you read the curious upgrade by Tim Ramey today of OME. When you dissect it..it is an absurd piece since no reason was given for his raising his price target. I trust he received some trades for this piece of analytical trash. … I know how long a normal ‘strategic review’ should last and on that basis the project is getting long of tooth. It’s likely not too late to avoid a knocked down dragged out proxy battle with us.. but should you wish to do so..you are running out of tarmac.” [NOTE: About Pivotal Research Group analyst, Tim Ramey]
- “Game On!! I’m amazed you are making me go to all this trouble … Must be listening to Tim [Ramey] too much.. BTW that junk yard dog Houston law firm you hired? are idiots.” [NOTE: Referring here to Omega’s outside counsel, Kai Liekefett.]
- “Are you Classy or Schmucky??? Kai-boy, I think the latter. … Being a marketing maniac and a junk yard dog simultaneously sometimes do not mix.” [NOTE: Email to Omega’s outside counsel, Kai Liekefett.]
- “Dream on Davie boy..” [NOTE: Email to Omega’s Nevada counsel David Garcia in response to Mr. Garcia’s request that Wynnefield withdraw its frivolous lawsuit against the Company.]
We believe these statements reveal important insights into Mr. Obus’ abrasive, erratic, short-sighted and self-interested focus. Many of these emails were sent by Mr. Obus while the Board was in good faith conducting a publicly announced strategic review and seeking to find a reasonable settlement with Wynnefield to avoid a distracting and costly proxy fight while protecting the interests of all stockholders. The settlement offers the Board put forth included standard provisions, such as a customary standstill that Mr. Obus refused to accept “under any circumstances.”
Wynnefield has time and again demonstrated what we believe is a blind commitment to a destructive and costly campaign that only serves its short-sighted interests. A lawsuit recently filed by Wynnefield in Nevada is yet another example of Wynnefield’s misguided focus. To spend Wynnefield’s investors’ money pursuing this frivolous lawsuit is an irresponsible attempt to distract Omega stockholders from the important issues and Wynnefield’s lack of a substantive plan for Omega. In fact, associates of Wynnefield were overheard bragging about their clever scheme to manufacture this lawsuit to be used in the campaign, understanding that the lawsuit would not be resolved quickly. This is further evidenced by the fact that, although the lawsuit was already filed last Friday, Wynnefield waited five days until it filed a motion for a preliminary injunction yesterday afternoon. Apparently, Wynnefield is in no rush to obtain a court ruling – because they do not have a case and are more interested in tying up Omega’s time and resources.
Despite your Board having nominated a Wynnefield nominee and shown a consistent willingness to reach a settlement on customary terms, this hedge fund still insists on a director candidate who, according to Wynnefield’s own disclosures, has no relevant industry experience and whose financial background we believe would not be additive or complementary to our Board. Wynnefield also continues to advocate for actions that the Board has determined, following a thorough evaluation by J.P.