Bitcoin experienced a “flash crash” this morning, dropping from near $700 to $100 early Monday before stabilizing. The lunchtime price, quoted at Bitcoin Wisdom, stood near $655.
As reported in ValueWalk earlier this morning, the price dive occurred as talk of a crackdown in the U.S. and Russia came on the back of a technical glitch hitting the largest Bitcoin processor, Japanese-based Mt. Gox, all of which riled participants in the bitcoin market.
This drop in price was notable for several reasons.
Breaking out of previous range
The spike lower occurred on heavy volume but thus far the volume has not outpaced that on December 6, when Bitcoin had ended a three-day drop from $1,077 to $551 or the drop from $869 to $420 that ended on December 17.
High sell volume an issue
But perhaps most rattling to Bitcoin market participants is the sheer size of the drop, moving significantly below support to the $102 area. This has the look of a flash crash, as the market knifed through its previous trading range into lows not seen since October of 2013.
One professional trader noted that Bitcoin had established a range and that trading significantly below that range and then snapping back to “normalcy” is a sign of a market in need for maturity. Early talk is that Bitcoin needs a more professional market making system similar to the derivatives markets and the move lower was a result of a large volume trader.
The move in question, highlighted in a 1 minute and 15 minute price chart above, took place at approximately 4:54 AM EST on approximately 4,000 contracts traded in a one minute time frame, bringing the price of the currency to its knees. It then recovered near 5 AM on a little over 1,000 contracts, trading near the $600 level.
Bitcoin difficult to hedge
Professional market makers who do speak about Bitcoin note that the contract is challenged due to the difficulty to hedge risk. Most financial and commodity markets have a built in mechanism for the market maker to immediately hedge their exposures through markets with similar characteristics. However, Bitcoin is difficult to hedge because its price movement is considered independent of other established financial products such as bonds or foreign exchange products. Other digital currencies are too immature and illiquid to provide an accurate hedging environment for the market makers.
In a letter to customers, Mt. Gox seemed to say the issue was related to a wider problem with Bitcoin, a notion that has been disputed by some market participants.
Mt Gox responds
Full Letter from Mt Gox:
Dear MtGox Customers and Bitcoiners,
As you are aware, the MtGox team has been working hard to address an issue with the way that bitcoin withdrawals are processed. By “bitcoin withdrawal” we are referring to transactions from a MtGox bitcoin wallet to an external bitcoin address. Bitcoin transactions to any MtGox bitcoin address, and currency withdrawals (Yen, Euro, etc) are not affected by this issue.
The problem we have identified is not limited to MtGox, and affects all transactions where Bitcoins are being sent to a third party. We believe that the changes required for addressing this issue will be positive over the long term for the whole community. As a result we took the necessary action of suspending bitcoin withdrawals until this technical issue has been resolved.
Addressing Transaction MalleabilityMtGox has detected unusual activity on its Bitcoin wallets and performed investigations during the past weeks. This confirmed the presence of transactions which need to be examined more closely.
Non-technical Explanation: A bug in the bitcoin software makes it possible for someone to use the Bitcoin network to alter transaction details to make it seem like a sending of bitcoins to a bitcoin wallet did not occur when in fact it did occur. Since the transaction appears as if it has not proceeded correctly, the bitcoins may be resent. MtGox is working with the Bitcoin core development team and others to mitigate this issue.
Technical Explanation:Bitcoin transactions are subject to a design issue that has been largely ignored, while known to at least a part of the Bitcoin core developers and mentioned on the BitcoinTalk forums. This defect, known as “transaction malleability” makes it possible for a third party to alter the hash of any freshly issued transaction without invalidating the signature, hence resulting in a similar transaction under a different hash. Of course only one of the two transactions can be validated. However, if the party who altered the transaction is fast enough, for example with a direct connection to different mining pools, or has even a small amount of mining power, it can easily cause the transaction hash alteration to be committed to the blockchain.
The bitcoin api “sendtoaddress” broadly used to send bitcoins to a given bitcoin address will return a transaction hash as a way to track the transaction’s insertion in the blockchain.Most wallet and exchange services will keep a record of this said hash in order to be able to respond to users should they inquire about their transaction. It is likely that these services will assume the transaction was not sent if it doesn’t appear in the blockchain with the original hash and have currently no means to recognize the alternative transactions as theirs in an efficient way.
This means that an individual could request bitcoins from an exchange or wallet service, alter the resulting transaction’s hash before inclusion in the blockchain, then contact the issuing service while claiming the transaction did not proceed. If the alteration fails, the user can simply send the bitcoins back and try again until successful.
We believe this can be addressed by using a different hash for transaction tracking purposes. While the network will continue to use the current hash for the purpose of inclusion in each block’s Merkle Tree, the new hash’s purpose will be to track a given transaction and can be computed and indexed by hashing the exact signed string via SHA256 (in the same way transactions are currently hashed).
This new transaction hash will allow signing parties to keep track of any transaction they have signed and can easily be computed, even for past transactions.
We have discussed this solution with the Bitcoin core developers and will allow Bitcoin withdrawals again once it has been approved and standardized.
In the meantime, exchanges and wallet services – and any service sending coins directly to third parties – should be extremely careful with anyone claiming their transaction did not go through.
Note that this will also affect any other crypto-currency using the same transaction scheme as Bitcoin.
Conclusion: To put things in perspective, it’s important to remember that Bitcoin is a very new technology and still very much in its early stages. What MtGox and the Bitcoin community have experienced in the past year has been an incredible and exciting challenge, and there is still much to do to further improve.
MtGox will resume bitcoin withdrawals to outside wallets once the issue outlined above has been properly addressed in a manner that will best serve our customers.
More information on the status of this issue will be released as soon as possible.
We thank you for taking the time to read