In his Weekend Reading Notes to investors, while commenting on a possible second term for Jerome Powell as Fed Chairman, Louis Navellier wrote:
Many well-known hedge fund managers are also philanthropists, and many of them have their own foundations. Seth Klarman of Baupost is one of those with his own foundation, and he invested in a handful of hedge funds through his foundation. This list of Klarman's favorite hedge funds is based on the Klarman Family Foundation's 990 Read More
Janet Yellen Backs Jerome Powell For A Second Term
It’s not surprising to see that Janet Yellen has already backed Jerome Powell for a second term as Fed Chairman (see Bloomberg article, “Yellen Backs Powell Reappointment, Boosting Second-Term Odds,” August 21, 2021). Jerome Powell has been signaling his own desire to serve a second term by focusing on inclusive employment, mentioning multiple times that higher unemployment in African American and Hispanic communities is unacceptable. This surely will be supported by many progressive Democrats who otherwise might want to appoint a more liberal Fed Chair.
I think Jerome Powell met the tests of the position by handling several crises with swift action in order to contain them. Such extreme intervention in financial markets to the point that it renders market signals meaningless is not ideal, but he must have felt that he didn’t have a choice.
Last Friday, when Powell suggested that a taper of Fed asset purchases was coming in late 2021, the stock and bond markets both rallied, which indicates that the majority of investors bought his presentation.
If the present pace of asset purchases is $120 billion per month, is Powell then saying he will shrink that total by $10 or $20 billion per month? He didn’t put a number (or a specific date) on the event.
I know what happened in late 2018, when accelerating Fed balance sheet shrinkage caused the stock market to dive dramatically in a good economy, so the Fed is likely to start slow and then shrink the rate of asset purchases faster, and I doubt that there will be any Fed balance sheet shrinkage in 2021.
Fallout from the Afghan Fiasco
The fall of the government in Kabul poses no immediate risk to the U.S. economy, but it sure did damage the Biden administration’s poll numbers for the hasty and disorganized withdrawal, tainted by a terrorist attack. I think both the Russians and Chinese knew what was coming from the Taliban, whose leadership had made multiple diplomatic shuttles to both Beijing and Moscow, ever since the Trump administration announced its withdrawal plan. The collapsed Afghan security forces fought even less against the Taliban compared to the way the Iraqi security Forces fought against ISIS in Mosul. If it were not for Iran-backed Shiite militias and the Kurdish Peshmerga forces, I think ISIS would have been more successful in Iraq.
I can see Russian pipelines flowing through Afghanistan towards China and Chinese investment from its Belt and Road Initiative boosting the Afghan economy. In the end, the Trump administration gave the economic benefits to supporting Afghanistan to China and Russia, which is rather unfortunate.
If the midterm elections were held in 2021 instead of 2022, I think Republican control of Congress and/or the Senate would have been likely, given recent developments. And if inflation does not calm down in 2022 and the Biden administration continues on its tax-and-spend agenda, the chances of losing either the Senate and/or the House would be high.
The feared crackdown on U.S. tech giants has not yet come and, given how things are going for the Biden Administration at the moment, it may not be a wise idea for that to happen before the midterm elections. Some type of increased regulation on Big Tech is likely, but nothing like what is going on in China in their fierce crackdown on the domestic tech sector.