Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey defends its censorship of the New York Post’s Hunter Biden exposé.
Lee Ainslie's Maverick Capital had a difficult third quarter, although many hedge funds did. The quarter ended with the S&P 500's worst month since the beginning of the COVID pandemic. Q3 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Maverick fund returns Maverick USA was down 11.6% for the third quarter, bringing its year-to-date return to Read More
The "Fail Whale" Twitter displayed in its early years during service interruptions.
Twitter's founders accidentally created an addictive platform which now has more than 150 million daily users. No competitor threatens Twitter's niche of breaking news and pithy commentary. The only foreseeable threat for years has been government intervention, and Twitter may have finally asked for it by censoring a newspaper article weeks before the election. Let's see why, and then look at how shareholders who are still bullish can limit their risk.
Background: A Potential Goldmine
Gone are the days of refreshing CNN.com or whatever during current events. It's faster and easier to find the journalist closest to today's disaster and watch their Twitter feed instead. And while that journalist will certainly have a published article up within the next 15 or 20 minutes at their day job, their tweets on the subject have probably already been retweeted a few thousand times and seen by a couple million people. And if you believe the typical information addict is going to go back to refreshing individual blogs and news sites, that's ridiculous. [...]
The Fav-and-RT-based serotonin reward system unintentionally built into Twitter also has the side effect of forcing introverts to obsessively write pithy jokes for huge audiences for free, day in and day out. Free funny content! Sometimes by actual comedians you've heard of! And some of those times, from good comedians! Users don't even have to do anything special to gain access to that, they just open Twitter and read it. Free content shoots out like a fire hose.
On top of that, Twitter emerged as a platform for organic commerce: users sell each other tickets, make bets with each other, recommend all sorts of products to their followers. All Twitter had to do was to facilitate that commerce. Instead, it has incurred the wrath of Republican politicians by censoring a New York Post article critical of Hunter Biden.
Censoring The New York Post's Hunter Biden Expose
On Wednesday, Twitter users were blocked from sharing the New York Post's exposé of Hunter Biden's emails.
This is a Big Tech information coup. This is digital civil war.
I, an editor at The New York Post, one of the nation’s largest papers by circulation, can’t post one of our own stories that details corruption by a major-party presidential candidate, Biden. pic.twitter.com/BKNQmAG19H
— Sohrab Ahmari (@SohrabAhmari) October 14, 2020
Twitter's stated rationale for its censorship was that the Post's article included information it obtained without authorization.
Commentary on or discussion about hacked materials, such as articles that cover them but do not include or link to the materials themselves, aren’t a violation of this policy. Our policy only covers links to or images of hacked material themselves.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020
Twitter users replied that Twitter didn't similarly censure other news articles based on unauthorized information, such as the recent New York Times article on President Trump's tax returns. Some users pointed out that, according to the Post's article, they obtained Hunter Biden's emails legally (reportedly, Biden left the laptop with a repair shop; after he didn't return to pay for the repair or pick up the laptop, it became the shop owner's legal property). Other users argued that the biggest scoops in journalism of the last fifty years relied on illegally obtained information, such as the Pentagon Papers.
Republican politicians such as Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri threatened to take action against Twitter.
[email protected] @jack this is not nearly good enough. In fact, it’s a joke. It’s downright insulting. I will ask you - and @Facebook - to give an explanation UNDER OATH to the Senate subcommittee I chair. These are potential violations of election law, and that’s a crime https://t.co/Rylva8UJv9
— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) October 15, 2020
President Trump called for repealing the FCC's Section 230, the regulation that enables Twitter to avoid the potential liabilities associated with being a publisher.
So terrible that Facebook and Twitter took down the story of “Smoking Gun” emails related to Sleepy Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, in the @NYPost. It is only the beginning for them. There is nothing worse than a corrupt politician. REPEAL SECTION 230!!! https://t.co/g1RJFpIVUZ
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 14, 2020
All Bark And No Bite?
Observers on both ends of the political spectrum were quick to note that during the first two years of President Trump's term, Republicans controlled both Houses of Congress and did nothing to restrict social media companies. For example, this was the reaction of the liberal opponent of monopolies, Matt Stoller.
FB and Twitter doing a master class for conservatives on why their faith in libertarians and monopolistic corporations was the dumbest possible choice imaginable.
— Matt Stoller (@matthewstoller) October 14, 2020
And this was conservative pundit Pedro Gonzalez's response to an angry tweet by Senator Tom Cotton:
Yeah okay but you Republicans have been talking a big game for four years and have achieved absolutely nothing https://t.co/cMEevmDRZo
— Pedro 🎃 Gonzalez (@emeriticus) October 15, 2020
In Case Their Bite Is Worse Than Their Bark This Time
In case the Republicans' bite is worse than their bark this time, and they materially impact Twitter, below are a couple of ways Twitter shareholders can stay long while strictly limiting their risk. Here, we scan for optimal, or least-expensive, hedges using put options and collars to protect a Twitter position.
In the video above, we limited our search to hedges expiring in March, but readers can experiment with different time frames as well.