The number of publicly available data increases year by year. Every day we are overwhelmed with hundreds of news, some of which have nothing to do with reality. It is worth to ask yourself whether being “up to date” with the news is the obligation for the successful investor or maybe intensive information processing brings more harm than good.
Examples from the recent weeks
At the beginning of December, the news about the trade truce between US and China has been released. According to that agreement, the plan to impose additional tariffs on Chinese goods on January 1st have been postponed for two months. Both countries gave themselves extra weeks to work out a compromise that would protect the world from negative effects of ongoing trade war.
Voss Capital is betting on a housing market boom
The Voss Value Fund was up 4.09% net for the second quarter, while the Voss Value Offshore Fund was up 3.93%. The Russell 2000 returned 25.42%, the Russell 2000 Value returned 18.24%, and the S&P 500 gained 20.54%. In July, the funds did much better with a return of 15.25% for the Voss Value Fund Read More
In the upper left of the chart you can see how the US shares reacted to that news.
As you can see, everyone who has invested after the news, quickly found himself in the red.
Another example is the fake news article from January 17th containing the information that the American side of the dispute was to withdraw from some of the tarrifs imposed on the Chinese products. News led stock indexes to 1% hike. After that, it turned out that the information was fake. Ultimately, the stock market quickly returned to its original state.
Source: dif broker
We have also experienced an interesting examples of market turbulence induced by the news during the recent days. No more than a week ago, during one session we have received a statement from Larry Kudlow that negotiations with China are far from a compromise, and later, on we have been informed that the meeting between Trump and Xi in February will likely not take place. Both news pushed shares prices down:
At this point, it is worth to remind the fact that Kudlow is the same "expert" who has been anticipating another great year for the American economy in the end of 2007. In addition, he has warned about problems with the economy in 1993. In both cases he was completely wrong.
To sum up our examples of news affecting share prices, we show below the recent case which, occured 2 days ago.
The main reason for this price inflation was the planned deadline shift for China's tarrifs. The same one that has already shifted at the beginning of December, as it was mentioned above.
You can go crazy, right? And let's realize that in this case of many of these optimistic news, China press has presented US-China talks very differently.
Now think about how much time do you spend for checking what is going on. How many shallow stories have you read over the last year? How well the investors which you know react on kind of stories?
Above, we have shown you examples of situations in which people has been investing based on the news. As a result they either lost money (due to fake news) or they were two steps behind the market buying shares at higher prices, right after people or financial institutions who have had better access to information. Moreover, giving a lot of attention to the news turns even against those who do not make immediate investment decisions. Below are a few arguments in this matter.
Dobelli: Less news, more knowledge
We were inspired to write this article by Rolf Dobelli, a Swiss publicist who pay attention in his texts and speeches to the disadvantages of constantly tracking the news.
One of Dobelli's main arguments is the fact that the information presented at the moment (especially in a dramatic way) is assessed by us as much more important than it really is. The good example is the ongoing trade war. First, let's take into consideration how often the trade war have been discussed within the last six months. Then, let's compare this with the frequency of news on the deteriorating economic situation (recession in Italy and Germany, issues in China or Japan). From the investor's perspective, this second issue is more important, and yet the topic No. 1 dominates in the media. Why? Because you can make a good show out of it and write about it every day.
Since we have already mentioned this, it is possible to add another Dobelli's argument. He emphasizes that if the news really give such an advantage both in investments and in other areas, journalists would be the richest people in the world. Everyone can judge what's the reality. The fact is that journalists are required to provide a certain number of texts at work. Therefore, this is why they mostly provide embarrassingly shallow information.
Here is another problem. We are overwhelmed by the huge number of shallow news, which (in the case of investors) contain gigantic amounts of data but little or no knowledge. In this way, we litter our mind and waste time, while limiting our ability to actually explore the subject and think creatively.
Dobelli also raises one important issue. News are usually very short. They roughly require about 20 seconds of our attention and… that’s all, we put some more data in our heads again. Unfortunately, usually we do not notice that thousands of such news limits our ability to maintain concentration over a longer period of time. In the best case, we see it after a time when reading a book is becoming more and more difficult. Older readers will probably think "non sense!", but the majority of young people know perfectly what is going on, because this problem already affects them.
Dobelli's last argument is the fact that people are simply healthier when they do not follow the news.
After listening to Rolf Dobelli we quickly created a list of insights on this topic. Let's start with the issues related strictly to investments.
The type of information that strongly affects investors are the recommendations of brokerage houses. We could recommend checking the effectiveness of analysts' forecasts or the performance of investment funds, but it would be better to give first-hand example. The stock company of our friend was valued twice by the same firm. Despite the fact that there were no major changes within the company between the first and the second valuation (only the share price dropped significantly), the first target price was PLN 4, and the second PLN 1.80. When the owner asked, "where does the difference come from?" The analyst replied that "previously the company's price was increasing and now it is falling".
We absolutely do not say that the valuation process can end up the same in each case. We only show how dangerous it is to use recommendations from brokerage houses, whose employees often make an analysis under pressure.
Let's go back to the daily news. In regards to that, Nassim Taleb in his book called "Black Swan" touched on an important issue. He pointed out that for economic journalists it is really common to assign the reason for every event. Everything needs to have an explanation and no one even thinks that certain events can be accidental. That's why in the headlines we read "Stocks are rising as a result of good data from the labor market" or "Indices fall through lack of agreement between USA and China" and so on. Journalists always have some explanation, although many other factors influence the stock exchange at the same time. The problem is that many market participants treat these suspicions of journalists as revealed truth and in this way build their image of the market. Unfortunately, they will not see the information in the media headlines "The shares are rising, because President Trump asked the Plunge Protection Team for the intervention."
Another example are the news of the companies results. We all know that they are important. However, the problem is that the headlines are shouting to us that "Company X showed better than expected results". Perhaps, we repeat ourselves in this matter, but notice that a man who checks the news selectively and does not have time for deeper analysis will not come to mind how these results are still "better than expected" all the time. We described it in details in our article "How to conjure results better than expected" https://independenttrader.org/how-to-conjure-results-better-than-expected.html.
Additional argument that the common news are harmful is the fact that they take away the time that we could devote to the analysis of historical data. The difference is crucial. News often evoke emotions, while long-term analysis help us look at the market more reasonably. Effect is that the news-based investor will buy shares in the US. Why? Because the price increases. On the other hand, someone whose decisions are based on analyzes will look for the market with a price to earnings ratio below 8. In the long term, this second person will earn much more. This is confirmed by the results of the MOAR portfolio strategy by Michael O'Higgins compared to the main stock indices in the US.
Our last observations goes beyond the world of investment and concerns the role of media and politics in our lives. During the dominance of radio and television the idea was quite simple. There was a specific message for the citizens, there was no discussion or space for an independent insights. A lot has changed when the Internet has become more popular. From then, billions of people have gained access to the real knowledge, where they can read the texts of both biased and objective authors. As a result, an increasing part of society (mainly talking about young people) comes to the conclusion that the role of politicians in their lives could be much smaller and completely nothing wrong would happen. The only response from politicians and related media is to play on emotions, and preferably - to maintain an atmosphere of fear and hate. Therefore, news are largely like a circus full of wild animals in which dominate: the war between Republicans and Democrats (both parties sponsored by the same people), alleged and true crimes of dictators in the Middle East, Iran's armaments, potential war with North Korea, and now also a trade war with China. Hence, the more time you devote to the news, the more your head is occupied by the topics you follow. As a result, it seems that you need politicians from the party X to defend you against politicians from the party Y, or vice versa.
First of all, we would like to point out that we do not entirely support the Dobelli's approach, who has cut off himself from the news completely. We can not ignore the reality that surrounds us. The facts are that as a result of the use of this power of fear , the bankers have completely made the financial markets dependent on their actions. Therefore, even long-term investors should pay attention to the announcements of central banks.
However, this does not change the fact that the vast majority of news we are bombarded with is an obstacle on the way to a good investment result. Therefore, the optimal solution is to spend up to 10% of the time you have on listening or reading. Try to focus on books, newsletters, blogs, historical data analyzes, movies and valuable YouTube channels. After a few months you will gain a new real knowledge. Your creativity will improve, and emotions will play a smaller role. You will be able to distinguish between reliable information and propaganda. This is the key to success.
Ultimately, the stock market is still a good place for rational people. The financial market is the place where rational individuals can take away money from those people who are susceptible to emotions. Although we admit that in the case of the current stock exchange cycle, it takes an extremely long time.
During the writing of conclusions, we have reminded ourselves that sometimes the best investors admit in interviews that they have made the best investment decisions in their lives after a period of total cut-off from the finance world. This was the case of Stanley Druckenmiller, whose break lasted months. It is a liitle different case than cutting of the news itself, but it also gives a food for thought.
At the end, we leave you with one question from Rolf Dobelli:
"Are you able to find at least one of the thousands of news stories you heard last week that allowed you to improve your private or professional life?"