In light of the SEC requiring all crypto exchanges to register with the agency, Joseph Weinberg, OECD Think Tank Special Advisor and Chairman of Shyft, a blockchain protocol that will create a new standard for the KYC/AML mandates, believes the SEC is moving in the right direction but needs to take it further and collaborate with intergovernmental agencies to avoid fractured, country-based governance we are seeing with the internet re: data privacy issues. A few high-level bullets from Mr. Weinberg below:
- “Crypto exchanges” is a misnomer but terminology is critical for securities law. Labeling them as exchanges implies securities dealings and securities markets. The SEC is doing its job and protecting consumers from market risks.
- We need to avoid fractured governance the way we have done with the internet, where different countries have different regulations. This doesn’t work with information flowing freely cross-borders.
- Cryptos are a new asset class, requiring new formulas and new approaches.
“Crypto Exchanges” Is A Misnomer
“Exchanges are regulated by the SEC and under IOSCO policy to be regulated by securities regulators. Our ecosystem has never been good at branding – bitcoin isn’t actually a coin, ICOs aren’t actually coin offerings and exchanges aren’t actually exchanges.
Since its inception in January 2012, the long book of the Voss Value Fund, Voss Capital's flagship offering, has substantially outperformed the market. The long/short equity fund has turned every $1 invested into an estimated $13.37. Over the same time frame, every $1 invested in the S&P 500 has become $3.66. Q1 2021 hedge fund Read More
“Crypto exchanges” are actually marketplaces where buyers and sellers come to transaction between two or more parties. The majority of technology professionals building these exchanges aren’t familiar with securities law where terminology is very important. To use the terminology of an exchange implies securities dealings and securities markets.
“The SEC is doing their jobs in protecting consumers from market risks. Any terminology that may mislead and put investors and consumers at risk. It would be correct for the SEC to issue a courtesy to these new companies that if they continue to use terminology like this, they will be scrutinized under securities law. The SEC could bring about a lot of clarity if it would issue a definition of what an exchange is and the laws that govern this to the crypto community.”
Need For Intergovernmental Collaboration on Global Crypto Policies
“In order to properly address these issues globally, there needs to be collaboration and coordination between intergovernmental agencies and organizations to focus on policy for the industry. We need to put this in motion now before we have a runaway effect where policy is fractured, like we saw with the internet and starting to see in the crypto space. The problem comes when you have one country like Japan overseeing bitcoin as a currency, therefore regulated by the central bank, and another country saying that it is a commodity and regulated by government agencies like the CFTC. Cryptocurrencies is a completely new asset class, which requires new formulas of thinking and new approaches. While the SEC acting proactively is in the right direction, they also need to work with the ecosystem on these issues. We need policy and standards for the global community on how to approach these issues together.”