The Bitcoin Investment Trust (GBTC) Is A Joke, Right?

bitcoin price surgegeralt / Pixabay

For investors looking to get exposure to Bitcoin, the idea is that the only way is the Bitcoin Investment Trust. But as the saying goes, “A fool and his money are soon parted.”

[REITs]

  • Q3 2017 Hedge fund letters, conferences, interviews, features etc
  • Hailed by many the “Next Warren Buffett”,  some are calling a bluff 
  • Baupost Letter Points To Concern Over Risk Parity, Systematic Strategies During Crisis
  •  Public Pension Situation Is As Bad As You Think: Moody’s

The GBTC is not an ETF, but a trust. It can only own a certain amount of Bitcoin and does not track the commodity/currency/asset (whatever you’d like to call it) like gold ETFs do with gold. Instead, for one unit of the GBTC, investors get 0.09242821 Bitcoin and also have to pay a 2% annual fee. Today, investors are paying $800 per GBTC unit while the actual net asset value of each unit is $443 — an 80% premium.

Check out what we’re doing on the premium side + get investing ideas from activist investors.

Money continues to flow into Bitcoin and investors are hungry to get exposure. If Bitcoin is going to $100,000, the case can be made, what does it matter if you’re effectively paying double the price today? Well, while Bitcoin can go to $100,000, the sizable premium that GBTC enjoys won’t last forever. Eventually, GBTC could even trade at a discount if we do see an ETF hit the market that tracks the cryptocurrency like that of a gold ETF. As well, competition for investor dollars in the cryptocurrency space are going to rise, and ultimately, I think a cryptocurrency ETF that owns a diversified portfolio of cryptos wins out over the GBTC and any Bitcoin ETFs.

Still, for now, Bitcoin is king with a network — and that shouldn’t be overlooked — even for retail investors.The conventional EBITDA multiple doesn’t work when valuing Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, and that’s what confuses the likes of Howard Marks and other Wall Streeters. So the valuation conversation is a bit confusing and perhaps futile. Bitcoin is doing what PayPal (PYPL) initially set out to do – create a new world currency. The idea was to create a system that was just a massive database ledger where you had debits and credits, and you never had to leave the system. When PayPal got bought by eBay (EBAY), all that changed.

Some call Bitcoin a commodity, some a currency, others a security. Bitcoin doesn’t want to be the next MasterCard (MA), so it’s not about being a transaction network.

Thinking of Bitcoin as a payment processor is wrong – hence, the reason valuations can be misconstrued. Bitcoin taking some of the fees that MasterCard collects is nice, but the function of Bitcoin as a payment is secondary. Anyone that tries to value Bitcoin as a payment processor is missing the point.

For one there’s Bitcoin the currency and the Bitcoin network and blockchain. The theoretical value of that protocol will grow faster as more applications are built on top of it. The success of applications leads to further growth along the protocol – it’s a vicious cycle that has an exponential style curve, as opposed to a linear one.

As a Bitcoin holder, think of yourself as a shareholder and the network/blockchain/protocol is the company. The company grows as more networked applications are built on top of the network. Sure, applications running on the network will be in competition and those trying to build the Visa (V) on top of the blockchain will have to fight off a lot of competition, but there will be big winners (i.e. applications build on the protocol). But regardless of who wins, the blockchain benefits and the only way for most people to participate is by owning the crypto token – Bitcoin.  Modelling that is tough, and next to impossible to old-school analysts on Wall Street.

As for Bitcoin’s technology, it gets an upgrade in November. The block size in the Bitcoin blockchain will double and the transaction speed should increase nicely. Faster, and more, transactions is a big positive for increasing the usefulness of Bitcoin. Then there’s the other major catalyst for Bitcoin, which is, as the cryptocurrency industry gets close to $100 billion in market cap, institutional investors can no longer ignore it. With that, there’s more money looking to buy Bitcoin, as well, there’s more pressure to create a sound public market product that more accurately tracks the Bitcoin price — unlike GBTC.

In the end, if Bitcoin can prove itself as a stable store of value, it’ll be even closer to being a traditional financial product, which could then win the respect of larger investors. The big key is not to construe what makes Bitcoin valuable – the mining network and protocol – with what the media claims as the usefulness for the token.

And for investors, it’s not hard to buy Bitcoin these days. The biggest exchange is Coinbase and makes setting up an account, funding it, and buying bitcoin rather flawless — all of which can be done from your phone.

Paying a near 100% premium (with the GBTC) for getting exposure to an asset that was created so you didn’t have to go through Wall Street is rather nonsensical. As well, the Bitcoin that the GBTC is not insured and I’m not sure of how well it’s secured against hackers. You don’t have to be tech savvy or have a computer engineering degree to own Bitcoin outright. That high premium for GBTC will also come crashing down a Bitcoin ETF is approved, or even a cryptocurrency ETF. Be wary.

Article by Activist Stocks

For exclusive info on hedge funds and the latest news from value investing world at only a few dollars a month check out ValueWalk Premium right here.

Multiple people interested? Check out our new corporate plan right here (We are currently offering a major discount)



4 Comments on "The Bitcoin Investment Trust (GBTC) Is A Joke, Right?"

  1. Also, the author is forgetting to add the value of the Bitcoin Cash

  2. Completely agree. Citron research is a joke. And Andrew Left obviously makes money shorting stocks like GBTC while conveying half truths online for his own agenda at the expense of everyone elses. He’s a dangerous man this way because he causes people to lose money by not explaining the entire story on both sides, but merely one side in order to cause a stock to drop as he is shorting. Peiple dont do their own research nd then listen to what he says and panic and sell. And although short selling certainly adds to market transparency and price discovery, when people like Andrew Left use it while expousing half truths about a stock like GBTC that in my book is called manipulation.

  3. Another monotonous article on GBTC’s premium. How many times has this already been said over the past 12 months? What the article fails to mention (of course) Is that the advisor of GBTC, just pulled their ETF request from the SEC. Additionally the SEC just requested two other asset managers to withdraw their own ETF applications soon after.

    So once and for all let’s get the facts straight: until there is a transparent futures and derivative market the SEC will never approve any ETF based on that underline asset. In the meantime funds like GBTC and there premium are worth their premium because they are the only way to invest ypur 401k or IRA money in this asset class. Additionally, the premiim is warranted for non retirement accounts because of the ease of storage withoht the need for a wallet, safety issues, tax compliance, etc.

  4. Was this article written by Andrew Left himself? Seriously? GBTC allows you to invest in bitcoin with IRA/401K money. That is why there is a premium. How safe do you think your bitcoins are on Coinbase? To properly protect your bitcoins you need to use a backed up paper wallet. Only a fool would leave their coins on an exchange that can get hacked any number of ways. Also, do you really think GBTC did not do their research for properly securing their assets? This article is propaganda for Citron Research.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.