Some famous sports quotes can help advisors think about the various aspects of selecting an ETF.
Vince Lombardi, the legendary Green Bay Packers head coach, famously declared: “Winning isn’t everything; it’s the only thing.” Although Lombardi was not the first to utter the quote, the statement cemented his public image and became a mantra in sports.
Q3 2017 Hedge fund Letters, Conferences, Pitches; Dalio Vs Grant IN-DEPTH And Much More
Yet Lombardi later expressed regret for the iconic saying, conceding that it was too broad. “I meant the effort. I meant having a goal,” as he was later quoted. “I sure didn’t mean for people to crush human values and morality.”1
In an investing context, low cost has become a mantra. But like the Lombardi quote, it’s become too broad, too much of the focus.
Let me explain.
Low cost is good for investors, who get?to keep more of their gains. Vanguard has unapologetically been a force for lower fees throughout its history, and it will continue to be.
The Vanguard Effect® has influenced the entire industry. More than 60% of industry assets?are now in the two least expensive deciles of mutual funds and ETFs (more than half of those assets were in index funds), and less than 1% of assets are in the most expensive decile of funds and ETFs. (See figure below.) This is a fantastic outcome for investors.
ETF and mutual fund assets by deciles of expense ratios
(lowest to highest)
Source: Morningstar, Inc., data as of May 31, 2017.
What’s also interesting about these Morningstar data (as of May 31, 2017) is that the highest expense ratio product in the lowest decile dropped more than 20% in the last ten years. So costs are falling across the board even as assets are migrating to lower-cost funds.
How much of a difference can low-cost make? It depends
But as expense ratios drop to near zero, there is less relative benefit now to an investor who naively chooses the cheapest option in the category.
Let’s consider a client who invests $1 million?in ETFs. If the client’s average cost is as little as 10 basis points, that client would spend $1,000 on fund management. If the expense ratios in the portfolio dropped to 9 basis points, on average, that millionaire client would save only $100. While that is a difference, it certainly raises the question of how important that last basis point is when considering an index fund or ETF. With ETF expense ratios converging in many core products, it should be apparent that other factors, such as strategy or portfolio manager execution, have a longer-term impact on an investor’s ability to reach his or her long- term goals.
Of course, cost matters a lot when you’re considering an 80- to 120-basis-point expense ratio investment versus a 12- to 25-basis-point investment. In that case, the expense ratio should be near the top of the due diligence checklist. When the differences in expense ratio among competing products are only a handful of basis points, cost should probably fall further down the due diligence checklist.
Let’s then consider another famous sports quote:
“Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence win championships.” –Michael Jordan
As Jordan’s quote alludes to, a team needs more than just talent to succeed. In a similar vein, investors should look beyond the expense ratio to successfully identify a product that best fits their needs.
Five points for due diligence
These five aspects are powerful additional filters to use when choosing an investment.
1) Investment strategy. The notion that index funds, even within the same category, are interchangeable commodities is a falsehood. You must understand the index and the assumptions behind why the index was chosen as a benchmark.
An equal-weight index, for instance, will likely not perform like a market-cap-weighted index; differences should be expected.
2) Methodology. In fixed income, for example, there can be significant differences among products aiming to track the overall U.S. bond market. Some providers, like Vanguard, use float-adjusted benchmarks, which do not count bonds held by the Federal Reserve because those bonds are not part of the public market. Others do not use float- adjusted indexes. In equities, there can be differences in how to view the public float of various companies. These types of distinctions seem small but can yield a different portfolio exposure.
You need only to look at differences among seemingly identical products, such as the emerging markets equity ETFs with the three lowest expense ratios. (See table below).
Source: Morningstar, Inc., as of May 31, 2017. Data may differ from that found on ETF providers’ websites.
By Rich Powers; Head of ETF? Product Management of Vanguard - read the full article here.
