- Title: MITIGATING ESTIMATION RISK IN ASSET ALLOCATION: DIAGONAL MODELS VERSUS 1/N DIVERSIFICATION
- Authors: CHRIS STIVERS, LICHENG SUN
- Publication: THE FINANCIAL REVIEW, 2016 (version here)
- Don’t Dabble In Alternatives
- The Small-Cap Investing Handbook Part Ten: Conclusion
- Academic Research Insight: The Social Media Factor
- Academic Research Insights: Does The Scope Of The Sell-Side Analyst Industry Matter?
What are the research questions?
In spite of several efforts by researchers to overcome the estimation-risk problem (the use of estimate inputs based on sample information as if they were representative of the true population) which produces the so-called “wacky weights”, DeMiguel, Garlappi and Uppal (2009) present striking evidence that favors a simple 1/N na?ve portfolio strategy.
The authors challenge the results by DeMiguel et al. (2009) by studying the following research question:
The latest Robinhood Investors Conference is in the books, and some hedge funds made an appearance at the conference. In a panel on hedge funds moderated by Maverick Capital's Lee Ainslie, Ricky Sandler of Eminence Capital, Gaurav Kapadia of XN and Glen Kacher of Light Street discussed their own hedge funds and various aspects of Read More
- Are asset allocation models that use “diagonal” elements of the inverse covariance matrix superior to those using the “full” matrix, in addressing the “wacky weights” problem?
- Do “diagonal” models outperform the naive 1/N strategy?
What are the Academic Insights?
By using five different empirical datasets of disaggregate portfolio returns, simulated data, out of sample testing and the introduction of transaction costs, the authors find that:
- YES- Diagonal strategies naturally avoid short-sale positions and substantially mitigate the so-called “wacky weights” problem
- YES-Simple diagonal strategies based solely on estimates of total volatility, generally outperform the 1/N strategy. The differences in the performance metrics are statistically significant in most cases
Why does it matter?
This study adds to prior literature focused on comparing “full-matrix” strategies to 1/N. In fact, it studies “diagonal only” solutions that consider limited information such as volatility or idiosyncratic volatility. It shows that they avoid short sale positions and limit the “wacky weights” issue. Additionally, they generally outperform 1/N. Asset allocation and its research development is not dead yet!
The Most Important Chart from the Paper
Note: This site provides NO information on our value investing ETFs or our momentum investing ETFs. Please refer to this site.
Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
Please remember that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Please read our full disclosures. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. This material has been provided to you solely for information and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by the author and Alpha Architect to be reliable but it is not necessarily all-inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission from Alpha Architect.
Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom)
Article by Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA - Alpha Architect