The median buyout size of a US middle-market company fell slightly to $134 million in 2016, down a mere $4 million from the prior year. Given the minuscule decline, it’s clear there’s still plenty of competition from not only strategic acquirers in the upper end of the market but also fellow PE firms keeping transaction sizes relatively high.
But the median transaction size also speaks to just how much activity is concentrated in the lower middle market and the smaller end of the core middle market. It’s simply where many of the best-value propositions lie these days. Moreover, newer PE funds tend to be smaller, and as there was an influx of emerging managers over the past several years, their consequent scope would boost deal flow within the lower reaches of the US middle market.
The role of relative sector popularity should not be underestimated, as well—nowadays many of what are perceived to be safer investment opportunities are within fragmented sectors such as healthcare services.
Last but not least, the prevalence of add-ons as a strategy also definitely plays into skewing the median deal size lower, as PE fund managers look to build out extant portfolios at more reasonable prices and save via typical integrative strategies.
Note: This column was previously published in The Lead Left.
Looking for more mid-market data? Be sure to download our free 2016 Annual US PE Middle Market Report !
Article by Garrett James Black, PitchBook
