The Fed Who Cried Growth

The Fed Who Cried Growth by Jonathan Newman, Mises Institute

The FOMC has consistently overestimated future Fed Funds Rate (FFR) hikes. For a body that prides itself on super-scientific research methods and has teams of economists (self-described) and statisticians, it’s interesting that they can’t even predict their own behavior.

The graph is comical.

This Tiger Cub Giant Is Betting On Banks And Tech Stocks In The Recovery

D1 CapitalThe first two months of the third quarter were the best months for D1 Capital Partners' public portfolio since inception, that's according to a copy of the firm's August update, which ValueWalk has been able to review. Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more According to the update, D1's public portfolio returned 20.1% gross Read More


These errors can be either unintentional or intentional.

[drizzle]

If unintentional, they are super-optimistic that just a few more months of a near-zero FFR will stimulate spending and employment figures enough to justify the future FFR increases. Also, this would mean that their models are junk.

If intentional, they are just trying to project optimism, ever-reliant on the announcement effect.

The announcement effect, however, can fade like in the story of the boy who cried wolf.

Earlier this year, the Wall Street Journal published this graph that tells a similar story:

Fed Growth FOMC

My interpretation of these errors is the same. If unintentional, they represent economic ignorance; if intentional, they are an admission that they are powerless to bring about the economic recovery they have wanted to put in their trophy case for almost ten years now.

Either way, in the fable, the villagers stopped believing the lying little boy one day.

Jonathan Newman is a recent graduate of Auburn University and a Mises Institute Fellow. Contact: email

Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.

[/drizzle]