A Big Whine By The Big Banks
Over the past two days, the three largest American banks — that would be Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo — have all filed their 10-Ks. Taken together, the 3 filings added up to nearly 1,600 pages. After skimming large parts of them over a 24-hour period, we’d like to humbly suggest that the CIA seek to integrate the forced reading of lengthy SEC filings into their counter-terrorism efforts.
We are joking, of course, but one thing that came across from reading all three filings is that the big banks are very concerned with the current regulatory environment; and within the context of the national political competition underway, they are concerned about what might happen as a result of the upcoming presidential election.
Michael Mauboussin: Challenges and Opportunities in Active Management And Using BAIT #MICUS
Michael Mauboussin's notes from his presentation at the 2020 Morningstar Investment Conference, held on September 16th and 17th. Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Michael Mauboussin: Challenges and Opportunities in Active Management Michael Mauboussin is Head of Consilient Research at Counterpoint Global in New York. Previously, he was Director of Research BlueMountain Capital, Read More
According to the big banks, regulators of various stripes and flavors – at the state, federal and even international levels – have become increasingly aggressive. And while this is written in legalistic language, it’s hard to see this as anything other than a very loud whine, especially after reading the filings consecutively, as we did.
Here’s a snip from Bank of America’s 585-page 10-K filed yesterday afternoon:
Our regulators’ prudential and supervisory authority gives them broad power and discretion to direct our actions, and they have assumed an increasingly active oversight, inspection and investigatory role across the financial services industry… proceedings brought by regulators against the financial services industry generally has increased. In some cases, governmental authorities have required criminal pleas or other extraordinary terms as part of such settlements, which could have significant consequences for a financial institution, including reputational harm, loss of customers, restrictions on the ability to access capital markets, and the inability to operate certain businesses or offer certain products for a period of time.
And here’s a snip from JPMorgan’s 344-page filing on Tuesday.
To the extent that legislative or regulatory initiatives are imposed on a limited subset of financial institutions (based on size, activities, geography or other criteria), the requirements to which the Firm may be subject under such laws and regulations could require the Firm to restructure its businesses, or re-price or curtail the products or services that it offers to customers, which could result in the Firm not being able to compete effectively with other institutions that are not impacted in the same way.