Google vs. Amazon: A Valuation Faceoff
Google vs. Amazon: A Valuation Faceoff
Google (now Alphabet) and Amazon are two of the giants of the internet. As of the close on Friday, November 6, Google had a stock market capitalization of $541 billion while Amazon weighed in at $309 billion. The two companies are often lumped together, but from a valuation perspective, at least to date, they could not be more distinct. To see why we say this, remember that the source of all value is free cash flow and take a look at the Table below. No surprise in the case of Google. It generated $24 billion of free cash flow in 2014 even after deducting the company’s “other investments” that are not part of its core business. Add back those other investments and the free cash flow for 2014 was $34 billion.
In the case of Amazon, the free cash flow is, like the operating income, essentially zero. At a minimum, this puts to rest the assertion that the market is short-sighted and focuses too heavily on quarterly earnings. Amazon is one of the most valuable companies in the world and it has never had any quarterly earnings to speak of. The market clearly believes that someday Mr. Bezos will pull the switch and earnings and free cash flow will start pouring in, but that day has yet to arrive.
Baupost's investment process involves "never-ending" gleaning of facts to help support investment ideas Seth Klarman writes in his end-of-year letter to investors. In the letter, a copy of which ValueWalk has been able to review, the value investor describes the Baupost Group's process to identify ideas and answer the most critical questions about its potential Read More
|Stock market capitalization||541,150|
|– Net cash||(59,158)|
|Market enterprise value||481,992|
|Operating Income (EBIT)||49,505||40,116||32,505||26,273|
|– Corp Tax at 20%||(9,901)||(8,023)||(6,501)||(5,255)|
|– Increase in working capital||364||(31)||898||630|
|– Capital expenditures||(10,959)||(7,358)||(3,273)||(3,438)|
|– Other investments||(10,096)||(6,321)||(9,783)||(15,603)|
|Free Cash Flow||23,892||22,322||16,808||4,458|
But the point here is not to analyze Amazon in isolation, but relative to Google. Based on 2014 results, Google is winning the free cash flow race by more than $23 billion, more than $34 billion if you add back the other investments. Amazon’s free cash flow is less than 4% of Google’s.
To compare the operating values of the two companies, net cash (cash minus debt) must be deducted from the stock market values. In the case of Google, net cash is almost $60 billion (the free cash flow has to go somewhere) while at Amazon it is less than $5 billion (because it has been generating much less free cash flow). Therefore, the operating values are $482 billion for Google and $304 for Amazon. For the operating values to be this similar, it must be case that the market expects Amazon’s free cash flow to “catch up” to Google’s in the not too distant future given the impact of discounting.
|Stock market capitalization||309,090|
|– Net cash||(4,927)|
|Market enterprise value||304,163||63%|
|Operating Income (EBIT)||178||745||676||862|
|– Corp Tax at 20%||(36)||(149)||(135)||(172)|
|– Increase in working capital||974||767||1,523||1,464|
|– Capital expenditures||(4,893)||(3,444)||(3,785)||(1,811)|
|– Other investments||(172)||(832)||190||(119)|
|Free Cash Flow||797||340||628||1,307|
To be more specific, assume that a fair discount rate for both companies is 9% and that Google’s free cash flow grows initially at 10% falling to 4% in the long run. These assumptions are basically consistent with Google operating value. To rationalize the relative valuations, it turns out the Amazon’s free cash flow must grow at about 175% per year for the next twenty years (at which point it catches Google) to rationalize the relative valuation! Does that seem unlikely to you? If so, you are effectively saying that Google is underpriced relative to Amazon. If you were to buy one of the two stocks, Google would be the wiser choice. More generally, relative valuation often provides useful investment insight because one company can serve as a benchmark for the other.