Russia-China-U.S.: Triangle of Powers

Russia-China-U.S.: Triangle of Powers
MaoNo / Pixabay

Relations between China, Russia and the U.S. sometimes remind people of the relations between a group of lions fighting for a large piece of meat and the power that comes along with it. With the growing strength of its economy and geopolitical role, Beijing can’t seem to decide which to be friends with: Moscow or Washington. Relations among the world’s three most influential powers have been a topic of discussion of many experts and analysts around the world.

After President of China Xi Jinping’s first official visit to the U.S. and negotiations with U.S. President Barack Obama, it’s hard to say whether we are about to see any warmth in the ties between Beijing and Washington. And according to Dr. Andrei Vinogradov, director of the Russian Center for Political Studies at the Institute of Far Eastern Studies, at the Russian Academy of Sciences, Xi’s visit to the U.S. raises more questions than answers.

Seth Klarman Describes His Approach In Rare Harvard Interview

Seth KlarmanIn a rare interview with Harvard Business School that was published online earlier this month, (it has since been taken down) value investor Seth Klarman spoke at length about his investment process, philosophy and the changes value investors have had to overcome during the past decade. Klarman’s hedge fund, the Boston-based Baupost has one of Read More

“To deepen dialogue and cooperation in Asia-Pacific affairs,” to shape “major bilateral mechanisms like the Strategic and Economic Dialogue,” and to conduct international relations according to rules and laws – these were Xi’s general ideas, while “dialogue” is the keyword of Xi’s visit to Washington, Vinogradov believes.

Where China-U.S. interests contradict one another

Beijing is particularly interested in warm relations with Washington as it expands its reach into new fields, as Xi said himself during a forum in Seattle. With China firmly holding its ground in the South China Sea dispute, the political differences between the two countries could deepen further even though Beijing has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to reach a compromise.

“For the Chinese strategy dialogue is the key concept: it is important to look for the solutions to political problems. For the European political mentality a solution must be found. We see here a background from a certain civilization,” Andrey Vinogradov told Gbtimes.

Xi’s visit to the U.S. brought up a number of controversial areas of interests between Washington and Beijing, such as cyber-security, a number of agreements about relations between the two countries’ military, the need to reach mutual trust and other fields that are often discussed in the media.

“It is not a failure. For China, starting a negotiation process is more than half the battle. China expertly uses its time resources, not grasping at straws for an immediate decision, but solving the problem slowly and gradually,” Vinogradov said.

Russia has greater chance to become friends with China than U.S. does

While we see that the relations between the U.S. and China have yet a lot to gain in terms of mutual trust and the ability to reach compromises, Russia has greater chance to become close friends with China, Vinogradov believes.

“If A is dialogue and B is the result, in the Russia-China relationship not only has A been pronounced, but also B has been said as well. A Russian-Chinese dialogue is established, and moreover, many specific problems, both economic and political, have already been solved as a result of this dialogue and despite the existing difficulties,” Vinogradov explained.

The foreign affairs expert claims that China has opted for a great strategy of political cooperation on the international scene. Beijing begins to speak out from the position of a growing world power, which is indicated by its support and solidarity with Russia’s position regarding some critical global issues such as the Syrian conflict and Western sanctions against Russia.

However, China still positions itself as an advocate for peace in the whole world and promotes the principles of peaceful settlement of conflicts and non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries. So as for the relations between Moscow and Beijing, the countries’ leaders clearly demonstrate how bilateral and mutually beneficial agreements can easily transform into real contracts.

“In fact, the overall relationship between China and Russia is really at a very high level – at the level of the effective interaction, which cannot be said about relations between China and the US,” Vinogradov concluded.

Growing influence of China

After two years of rapid economic growth, China once again looks for other countries in order to invest and trade, which is why the “Silk Road” term often appears in the media. The efforts to create a modern version of Silk Road has become one of the key policies of Xi Jinping.

It is widely believed that from economic, diplomatic and military points of view, the efforts to expand its influence onto other countries have great chances to secure China’s dominance in Asia. Some experts believe China is looking to create a new sphere of influence, the so-called modern Great Game, which was the term to describe the rivalry between Britain and Russia in central Asia during the 19th century.

Xi revealed some additional details of the plan to expand the country’s influence earlier this year when he announced that Beijing was allocating $46 billion for investments and lines of credit in the China-Pakistan economic corridor that leads to the Gwadar port on the Arabian Sea. In April, China also announced its intentions to allocate $62 billion from the country’s external reserves to three policy banks that will be financing the expanding of the new Silk Road.

No country in the world will refuse China’s offers

The project of the new Silk Road not only reflects the reality of China’s growing ambitions but also offers to take a look at how Beijing makes macroeconomic decisions nowadays. It was noted by many experts that China often makes hasty decisions, while Chinese officials often compete in ambiguous and contradictory claims.

As China expands its economic interests abroad, its military and all of its security forces will be playing the most important role in Beijing’s success. China does not have any military bases abroad and has repeatedly claimed that any interference in the internal affairs of other countries is wrong. However, China’s recent anti-terrorist draft legislation allows the stationing of Chinese troops on the territories of other countries without their consent.

China’s large-scale investments may raise concerns regarding its potential political dominance following economic dominance, as it happened in Myanmar and Sri Lanka. But nonetheless, Beijing has high hopes that no country in the world will be able to refuse its seductive offers to invest large amounts of money.

Updated on

Polina Tikhonova is a writer, journalist and a certified translator. Over the past 7 years, she has worked for a wide variety of top European, American, Russian, and Ukrainian media outlets. Polina holds a Master's Degree in English Philology from the University of Oxford and a Bachelor's Degree in Journalism from the Saint Petersburg State University. Her articles and news reports have been published by many newspapers, magazines, journals, blogs and online media sources across the globe. Polina is fluent in English, German, Ukrainian and Russian.
Previous article Russia And Egypt: $1 Billion Mistral Deal
Next article Amazon Earnings Preview: Another Strong Q Expected

No posts to display


  1. There are nothing worthier that the hatred of whitemen to a stupidity and weakness when in fact Chinese is peace loving people, and China is weary of such stupid albino misconception. For the past 200 years since the Opium war, Chinese has been the subject of humility and harassment by the English descendant, notably the British and the Yanks for the lost of territory caused by them notably are Mongolia (Yalta), Hongkong (regain after 100 years), Diosan/Senkaku (Not handed by US and “given” to the Japs), Taiwan stand off 1995 (which is US deliberate ally) and now Spratly with the aim to smear China’s reputation first.
    The above are not included attempt to encroach China in Korea and Vietnam wars. The British Opium war is just an introduction of western “friendly” evil behaviour to China.
    The British pommy and the Yank understood this very well and they are very frighten of Chinese vengeance behaviour as well. That was one of the reason to host recent China President in a red carpet welcome to heal those pains inflicted by them for the past 200 years. It is time for China to reverse the situation back to the normal equilibrium. The Arabs did give a bitter lesson to the Yanks in 9/11, yet the Yanks chose to abolish attack on Saudi Arabia, but divert the war on terrorism to the weak countries such as Afghan and Iraq.

Comments are closed.