The Devastation Awaiting Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
February 17, 2015
by Keith Jurow
Themes for the next decade: Cannabis, 5G, and EVs
A lot changes in 10 years, and many changes are expected by the time 2030 rolls around. Some key themes have already emerged, and we expect them to continue to impact investing decisions. At the recent Morningstar conference, several panelists joined a discussion about several major themes for the next decade, including cannabis, 5G and Read More
Real estate investment euphoria is widespread. An asset class for which Wall Street has provided little useful information – residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) – is especially vulnerable if this euphoria is misplaced.
Let’s look at the history of the RMBS market and the fundamentals behind these securities today.
The desperate search for yield
As I have discussed in numerous articles (see here, for example), high-net-worth investors as well as institutions have been in a desperate search for yield. The Federal Reserve has driven down interest rates to levels that have made it impossible to obtain acceptable rates of return for traditional fixed income investments.
Because of the Fed’s QE policy, investors are compelled to purchase riskier investments hoping that they will provide higher rates of return. Many have plunged into RMBS.
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities
Non-agency RMBS are securitized mortgages that are not guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or insured by the FHA. By early 2004, the outstanding amount of non-guaranteed RMBS had more than doubled over the previous four years to $644 billion. Then the speculative mania moved into high gear. Subprime lenders were fed increasingly riskier loan applications by 50,000 mortgage brokers who recruited nearly any borrower who could sign his/her name.
With Wall Street frantically securitizing these loans and the three large rating agencies (Moody’s, S&P and Fitch) giving what later turned out to be highly questionable AAA ratings, underwriting standards deteriorated rapidly by mid-2006.
By the end of 2006, speculation reached incredible proportions and underwriting standards had completely collapsed. Half-million dollar mortgages with no down payment were commonplace. Most borrowers could get loans even when their total debt-to-income (DTI) ratio exceeded 50% as long as they had not defaulted in the previous two years.
From coast to coast, speculation had become the order of the day. Yet few analysts even hinted that this was certain to end in disaster.
As the housing insanity headed straight over a cliff, the total amount of outstanding subprime and other unconventional mortgages soared. When mortgage lending finally peaked in July 2007, an incredible $2.31 trillion of non-guaranteed RMBS were outstanding.
No one really knew the extent of the mess that was created.
Mortgage modifications designed to stop the bleeding
Before Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, a growing number of homeowners with non-guaranteed mortgages had already started defaulting. As 2008 unfolded, mortgage servicers were compelled to modify large numbers of mortgages to slow down this avalanche of defaults.
Hopes ran high that these modifications might slow the bleeding. Unfortunately, these hopes were dashed. Borrowers began defaulting on their modified mortgages in huge numbers. Amherst Securities Group (ASG) was the leading firm supplying comprehensive data on the mortgage market. They reported that by the end of 2009, 61% of borrowers with modified mortgages had re-defaulted within 12 months of receiving their modification.
A January 16 email report issued by the highly respected Inside Mortgage Finance stated that sub-prime loan modifications now totaled 62% of the loan balance of all outstanding sub-prime loans and a whopping 19% of all prime loans.
Millions of modifications have done little more than defer an inevitable calamity. The graph below showing the high rate of re-defaults makes this clear. The x-axis displays the number of months since the modification occurred.
Remember, if you have a question or comment, send it to firstname.lastname@example.org.
© 2015, Advisor Perspectives, Inc. All rights reserved.