Bove Declares Stalemate On Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac

Bove Declares Stalemate On Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac

Fannie Mae

Photo by NCinDC

Bove is right not to expect Fannie Mae reform this year, but the end of conservatorship that he supports still isn’t on the table

It wasn’t that long ago that Rafferty Capital Markets VP Richard Bove declared victory in the push to get Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac recapitalized and re-privatized, citing a massive change in FHFA policy. But after this week’s testimony by FHFA director Mel Watt in front of the House Committee on Financial Resources, Bove seems much less optimistic.

“My sense is that nothing will be done by Congress on the status of the GSEs for a year. The press is not interested in the issues. The public does not care because it sees no change. Stalemate!” he writes.

Consistency is what makes the top 50 best-performing hedge funds so strong

Every month and quarter, multiple reports on average hedge fund returns are released from several sources. However, it can be difficult to sift through the many returns to uncover the most consistent hedge funds. The good news is that Eric Uhlfelder recently released his "2022 Survey of the Top 50 Hedge Funds," which ranks the Read More

Housing Trust Fund is the biggest source of disagreement between Watt, House Republicans

Bove homes in on the three biggest disputes between Watt and Republican representatives regarding the GSEs. They opposed his decision to invest in the Housing Trust Fund, and argue that he doesn’t have the authority to restart payments under HERA (though HERA has been interpreted by the courts as giving FHFA an extremely wide berth); they argue that the new 3% down payment programs will lead to higher loan losses (and Bove agrees); finally Watt was pushed to explain how he believes guarantee fees should be set – whether they should ideally balance risk perfectly or be used to turn a profit.

Bove interprets that last bit as a debate about whether high g-fees might let private mortgage backers into the market and shrink the GSEs, but it was clear from context that the g-fee discussion was a different angle of attack on the Housing Trust Fund. If g-fees are too high, then the trust fund is being financed by borrowers, if they’re too low then it’s being financed by taxpayers.

Fannie Mae deadlock is over what comes next

“The Democrats are clearly making decisions that would lead to the continuation of the existence of the GSEs. The Republicans understand this and are fighting the willingness of the FHFA to take actions that that extend the life of the GSEs,” writes Bove.

But Watt has continually asked Congress to enact GSE reform (not just at this week’s hearing) and has refused to offer guidance about what he thinks that reform should look like. He also claimed during the hearing that he is an independent regulator and is not a part of the Obama administration.

Regardless the option that Bove and other Fannie Mae longs most want to hear discussed, the possibility of reviving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and ending the conservatorship, wasn’t on the agenda. There does seem to be a serious stalemate on GSE reform, but the question is what will come next, not whether we’ll go back to the old system.

Updated on

Michael has a Bachelor's Degree in mathematics and physics from Boston University and Master's Degree in physics from University of California, San Diego. He has worked as an editor and writer for several magazines. Prior to his career in journalism, Michael Worked in the Peace Corps teaching math and science in South Africa.
Previous article Intel Corporation President Sells Shares Twice In Ten Days
Next article Icahn Acknowledges He Sold Netflix, Inc. Shares Too Soon

No posts to display


  1. So if they can contribute funds (dividends that should go to share holders, me included) then they must be in a sound and solvent condition, therefore release them and let them uplist and we all win.

  2. So which political party thinks its OK to nationalize publicly traded companies to run budget deficits under the pretext of a false bailout? Is it my Republican party?

    I don’t believe it

  3. What about the rights of all the Middle class Americans who hold Fanni and Freddi stock in their
    retirement accounts. Are these politicians going to destroy the retirement accounts of millions of middle class Americans. along with the system that helped them buy their homes.

  4. The only way republicans do anything positive for F&F is if they invested in them and have some personal gains at stake.

    Blaming F&F for the republican housing crisis was always a comical piece of right wing propaganda, but that lie has done a lot of harm.

Comments are closed.