Technical Analysis: Dutch Study Misses The Broader Point, Says Parets

Technical Analysis: Dutch Study Misses The Broader Point, Says Parets

On March 17 ValueWalk reported on a white paper that drew the conclusion that individual investors lost money using technical analysis.  This was followed by other articles on the topic in the Financial Times and Business Insider.

Now comes a rebuttal from J.C. Parets, Founder & President of Eagle Bay Capital and co-chair of the New York city chapter of the market technicians association.  Parets makes the points that individual investors speculating with options and using a short term time horizon typically lose money regardless of the analytical method, fundamental or technical.

Alkeon: Big Tech Is Only Just Getting Started

TechnologyThe ACAP Strategic Fund's managers see a "significant scarcity of attractive asset allocation choices globally," but also a strong environment for fundamental stock picking. Q2 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more According to a copy of the fund's second-quarter investor update, which ValueWalk has been able to review, its managers currently hold a balanced Read More

Technical analysis: Not comparing apples to apples

“Individual investors lose money on average, especially those that trade options,” he wrote. “This is the case regardless of how they come to their conclusions (technical or fundamental).”  Options provide investors the right but not the obligation to purchase an underlying stock at a future point in time.  They are leveraged derivatives whose price can be influenced by a number of factors such as market volatility and time decay, not just the underlying movement of the asset.

“Fundamental analysis focuses on backward looking information (i.e. last quarters earnings release),” Parets said in an interview. “Technical analysis focuses on the market itself, which is a leading indicator.”

Perhaps Parets’ most significant argument came when he addressed the time frame in the study. The Dutch study essentially compared fundamental trades with a longer term investment time horizon to those using technical analysis, which had a shorter term focus.  Short term trading “is a money losing strategy, regardless of discipline,” Parets notes.

Time frame is key

“One of the best parts about technical analysis is the ability to apply our tools across various time frames,” he wrote.  “Our ability to start with longer-term trends and work our way down to short-term charts for entry and exit points is a huge advantage. Focusing on just the short-term makes you blind to bigger trends.”

Parets thinks the study misses the point on the use of technical analysis.  “Most importantly, we use technical analysis and price behavior to manage risk. This is what it’s all about,” he wrote.  Where is the study wrong?  “Technical analysis is the best way to properly manage risk. Without looking a price, how would you be able to do that? Clearly, these Dutch retail investors are focused on hitting home runs through options, rather than just managing risk while participating in the strongest longer-term trends. That’s a problem.”

Understandable explanation

“Technical analysis focuses on price,” Parets said in an interview. “If you ignore price, how can you possibly manage risk? Where do you know your thesis is wrong if you don’t look at price. Technicians know before they enter any position, where they are wrong and what the target is. For risk management purposes, I don’t know how it would be possible if you ignore price.”

Then Parets moves to put the difference in a simple format: “In a shopping mall, a fundamental analyst would go to each store, study the product that was being sold, and then decide whether to buy it or not,” he said in the interview.  “By contrast, a technical analyst would sit on a bench in the mall and watch people go into the stores. Disregarding the intrinsic value of the products in the store, the technical analyst’s decision would be based on the patterns or activity of people going into each store.”

Previous article Unilife Corp (UNIS) Redlining On Debt: Caveat Emptor
Next article Fannie, Freddie Senate Reform Will Die In The House: Raymond James
Mark Melin is an alternative investment practitioner whose specialty is recognizing a trading program’s strategy and mapping it to a market environment and performance driver. He provides analysis of managed futures investment performance and commentary regarding related managed futures market environment. A portfolio and industry consultant, he was an adjunct instructor in managed futures at Northwestern University / Chicago and has written or edited three books, including High Performance Managed Futures (Wiley 2010) and The Chicago Board of Trade’s Handbook of Futures and Options (McGraw-Hill 2008). Mark was director of the managed futures division at Alaron Trading until they were acquired by Peregrine Financial Group in 2009, where he was a registered associated person (National Futures Association NFA ID#: 0348336). Mark has also worked as a Commodity Trading Advisor himself, trading a short volatility options portfolio across the yield curve, and was an independent consultant to various broker dealers and futures exchanges, including OneChicago, the single stock futures exchange, and the Chicago Board of Trade. He is also Editor, Opalesque Futures Intelligence and Editor, Opalesque Futures Strategies. - Contact: Mmelin(at)

No posts to display