Moody’s Considering Ratings Downgrade for RBS


Moody’s Investor Service is considering cutting the debt and deposit ratings of the Royal Bank of Scotland, it said in a release today.

“Moody’s rating action follows the publication of a recent trading update, in which RBS’s management indicated that the group’s year-end 2013 results (scheduled to be published on 27 February 2014) would be materially impacted by additional provisions for pending litigations and conduct-related costs. As a result, the bank will report a weaker than previously anticipated regulatory capital position at end-December 2013, weakening its standalone credit profile,” the Moody’s report said.

Cutting the deposit rating typically means the banks incur increased costs for their debt, as investors demand higher interest rates to compensate for this perceived increased risk.

After A Tough Year, Odey Asset Management Finishes 2021 On A High

For much of the past decade, Crispin Odey has been waiting for inflation to rear its ugly head. The fund manager has been positioned to take advantage of rising prices in his flagship hedge fund, the Odey European Fund, and has been trying to warn his investors about the risks of inflation through his annual Read More

Legacy portfolio issues

“Last November, following the conclusion of the UK government review on the possible merit of a breakup of the group, RBS’s management announced that over a three-year period it would pursue (1) the accelerated wind-down of its legacy asset portfolio, which includes poor quality assets, such as Irish and UK commercial real-estate loans; and (2) the sale of its US retail and commercial banking business,” the Moody’s statement said.

Credit fundementals

The release said that:

During the review, Moody’s will assess whether the bank’s weakened credit fundamentals remain compatible with the current rating levels, taking into account:

(1) the risks and challenges associated with the execution of its recovery plan;

(2) the pending litigations and regulatory reviews that could lead to larger-than-expected financial losses, before RBS can offset them (at least partially) through other capital-accretive management actions; and

(3) other additional remedial actions that RBS management could decide to pursue, such as further asset disposals, following the review of the bank’s core operations.


Updated on

Mark Melin is an alternative investment practitioner whose specialty is recognizing a trading program’s strategy and mapping it to a market environment and performance driver. He provides analysis of managed futures investment performance and commentary regarding related managed futures market environment. A portfolio and industry consultant, he was an adjunct instructor in managed futures at Northwestern University / Chicago and has written or edited three books, including High Performance Managed Futures (Wiley 2010) and The Chicago Board of Trade’s Handbook of Futures and Options (McGraw-Hill 2008). Mark was director of the managed futures division at Alaron Trading until they were acquired by Peregrine Financial Group in 2009, where he was a registered associated person (National Futures Association NFA ID#: 0348336). Mark has also worked as a Commodity Trading Advisor himself, trading a short volatility options portfolio across the yield curve, and was an independent consultant to various broker dealers and futures exchanges, including OneChicago, the single stock futures exchange, and the Chicago Board of Trade. He is also Editor, Opalesque Futures Intelligence and Editor, Opalesque Futures Strategies. - Contact: Mmelin(at)
Previous article Netflix And Google To Enforce Net Neutrality?
Next article Hottest Links: Biased Algorithms, Keynes’s Portfolio, And Consensus

No posts to display