Buffett’s Long-Dated Puts Stir Up Pricing Controversy

Buffett’s Long-Dated Puts Stir Up Pricing Controversy
By Mark Hirschey (Work of Mark Hirschey) [CC BY-SA 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Warren Buffett sold a number of large, long-dated put options against various stock indices between 2004 and 2008, and while those puts are definitely liabilities, there seems to be a big disagreement about how much of a liability they should be reported as.

Play Quizzes 4

Options normally priced with Black-Scholes

Options are normally priced using the Black-Scholes equation, which takes a number of factors into account, including the asset’s underlying price, interest rate risk, and volatility. Dan McCrum, writing for FT’s Alphaville, does a great job explaining the nitty-gritty, but even without getting into how Black-Scholes works (or doesn’t, not everyone agrees with it or thinks it should be used it for valuation), the fact is that global markets tanked, interest rates fell, and volatility went up. All three of those factors should have contributed to major losses, so it’s strange that Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) reports the liability at just double the premium ($10 billion on $4.9 billion in premiums). Most people would have expected the value to be much higher.

How Value Investors Can Win With Tech And “Fallen” Growth Stocks

Valuation Present ValueMany value investors have given up on their strategy over the last 15 years amid concerns that value investing no longer worked. However, some made small adjustments to their strategy but remained value investors to the core. Now all of the value investors who held fast to their investment philosophy are being rewarded as value Read More

Except Buffett doesn’t trust Black Scholes

While it’s not clear exactly how Buffett valued the long-term put options, it is clear that he doesn’t put much faith Black-Scholes.

“Both Charlie and I believe that Black-Scholes produces wildly inappropriate values when applied to long-dated options. We set out one absurd example in these pages two years ago. More tangibly, we put our money where our mouth was by entering into our equity put contracts. By doing so, we implicitly asserted that the Black-Scholes calculations used by our counterparties or their customers were faulty,” he wrote in a Berkshire Hathaway letter from 2010. “We continue, nevertheless, to use that formula in presenting our financial statements.”

If Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) is still using Black-Scholes for options valuation, then the $10 billion in put option liabilities is hard to justify, but if the company has changed its valuation methods without telling anyone, that would also seem bizarre. Most likely people wouldn’t mind if he gave a detailed explanation of how he arrived at the $10 billion figure, since they could judge the soundness of his assumptions and calculate what they think the options should be valued at independently, but until some more details about how Buffett arrived at that figure we will have to continue to wonder.

Updated on

Michael has a Bachelor's Degree in mathematics and physics from Boston University and Master's Degree in physics from University of California, San Diego. He has worked as an editor and writer for several magazines. Prior to his career in journalism, Michael Worked in the Peace Corps teaching math and science in South Africa.
Previous article Looking Back at the Advisory Profession 20 Years from Now
Next article Peter Schiff – Surviving Austerity

No posts to display


  1. Buffett has made it clear that despite reservations he continues to use Black-Scholes. The recovery in the market since 2008 makes the liability from the fall in underlying price less than $4 billion. There has been dispute between Berkshire Hathaway and the SEC as to what is the appropriate volatility for these puts. IIUC Berkshire Hathaway has adjusted its volatility figure upwards to one which the SEC now finds acceptable.

Comments are closed.