Unbundled Cable Bad For Everyone: Needham

Unbundled Cable Bad For Everyone: Needham

This post first appeared on FloatingPath

An analysis on cable unbundling by Needham & Co. shows that those large amounts of channels you don’t watch have unseen benefits.

If à la carte pricing were to be implemented, Needham’s Laura Martin says that the losses would include $45 billion of TV advertising, 1.4 million jobs, $20 billion in corporate taxes paid, and $117 billion in market capitalization.

Carlson’s Double Black Diamond Ends 2021 On A High

Black DiamondIn December, a strong performance helped Carlson Capital's Double Black Diamond fund achieve a double-digit return in 2021. Q4 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Double-Digit Return According to a copy of the latest investor update, which ValueWalk has been able to review, Clint Carlson's Double Black Diamond fund returned 2.9% in December and Read More

In order to keep the average lineup of 180 channels, subscribers would see bills increase by about 75%. However, assuming most consumers select 15-20 channels (the popular range according to surveys), the revenue decrease for the industry could only support about 28% of current channels. In a worst case scenario, distributors would keep a large chunk of revenue up front (as happened in 2012) and pass along only $7 billion to content creators. This would lead to a 93% reduction in channels available.

Of course, consumers fed up with the average $720 in annual cable bills, largely for channels they don’t watch, can always cut the cord.

Updated on

No posts to display