Unbundled Cable Bad For Everyone: Needham

This post first appeared on FloatingPath

An analysis on cable unbundling by Needham & Co. shows that those large amounts of channels you don’t watch have unseen benefits.

Unbundled Cable Bad For Everyone: Needham

If à la carte pricing were to be implemented, Needham’s Laura Martin says that the losses would include $45 billion of TV advertising, 1.4 million jobs, $20 billion in corporate taxes paid, and $117 billion in market capitalization.

In order to keep the average lineup of 180 channels, subscribers would see bills increase by about 75%. However, assuming most consumers select 15-20 channels (the popular range according to surveys), the revenue decrease for the industry could only support about 28% of current channels. In a worst case scenario, distributors would keep a large chunk of revenue up front (as happened in 2012) and pass along only $7 billion to content creators. This would lead to a 93% reduction in channels available.

Of course, consumers fed up with the average $720 in annual cable bills, largely for channels they don’t watch, can always cut the cord.

About the Author

Floating Path
Floating Path explores economic and cultural phenomena. Floatingpath hopes to educate, inspire and provoke.