Apple Inc’s (AAPL) e-book pricing case has taken a new turn, with the company objecting to the exorbitant fees charged by the court appointed monitor.
Michael Bromwich, a former U.S. Justice Department inspector general, is charging a 15% administrative fee on top of his hourly rate. Moreover, he is also said to include the cost of hiring other lawyers who assist him.
Management recently stated that Bromwich’s proposed hourly fee of $1,100 is the highest ever a lawyer has charged them. Bromwich, on his part, justified the amount by stating that he has been handling the case through his consultancy, the Bromwich Group instead of his law firm Goodwin Procter LLP.
Yarra Square Partners returned 19.5% net in 2020, outperforming its benchmark, the S&P 500, which returned 18.4% throughout the year. According to a copy of the firm's fourth-quarter and full-year letter to investors, which ValueWalk has been able to review, 2020 was a year of two halves for the investment manager. Q1 2021 hedge fund Read More
For the first two weeks post his appointment, Bromwich charged $138,432, which is almost three-fourth of a federal judge’s annual salary.
The whole problem started in July 2013, when subject to some complaints regarding e-book pricing. The District Judge found Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) guilty of conspiring with five U.S. publishers that raised e-book prices by millions in total.
The accused publishers included companies such as Hachette Book Group, News Corp.’s (NWS) HarperCollins, Holtzbrinck Publishers, Penguin Group and CBS’s (CBS) Simon & Schuster Inc. Using this strategy, Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)’s thought of competing Amazon (AMZN) in the e-book market
In this connection, the federal government and 33 states asked the court to appoint an antitrust monitoring authority, which will look after Apple’s compliance matters for a period of 10 years.
During this process, Judge Cote proposed that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) should be forced to enter into separate contracts with each publisher and there should be a time gap of at least six to eight months between each contract. The court believed that this plan could restrict such pricing conspiracies in the future.
It remains to be seen how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) deals with the whole issue going forward. Although Apple intends to carry on its fight, we believe that the company is running out of options. Nevetheless, since the e-book segment does not form a major part of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)’s business, its impact on the stock will be limited.
Currently, Apple has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).