Info-Graphs, Politics

How Did The Media And Pollsters Get The Election So Wrong?

The day before the 2016 US Presidential Election, most pollsters and statistical models had pegged Hillary Clinton’s chances of winning at greater than 90%.

However, as we noted yesterday, the consensus view is not to be trusted in a post-Brexit world.

Here’s what went wrong:

2016 US Presidential Election

We looked at the predictions made by 12 major newspapers and pollsters the day before the election, to see where they went wrong.

[drizzle]

For Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire – not a single source gave an edge to Republicans.

  Correct Tossup Wrong Fail%
Pennsylvania 0 0 12 100%
Wisconsin 0 0 12 100%
Michigan* 0 0 12 100%
New Hampshire* 0 1 11 92%
Florida 1 3 8 67%
North Carolina 2 2 8 67%

Note: at time of publishing, Michigan and New Hampshire are very close and leaning Republican. The point still stands. Every pollster said these states were “likely” or “leaning” Democrat.

For Florida and North Carolina, the pollsters were slightly less reckless. The Associated Press correctly had the Sunshine State as “leaning red”, while the Huffington Post saw North Carolina ultimately voting Trump.

After this and the Brexit polling disaster, the media is sure to be much more cautious with their models going into the next big political event.

By Jeff Desjardins, Visual Capitalist

[/drizzle]

Get our newsletter and our in-depth investor case studies all for free!

  • burns_juanita

    It’s been one year since I resigned from my old job and that decision was a life-changer for me… I started freelancing from comfort of my house, over a website I stumbled upon on-line, for several hrs /a day, and I earn much more than i did on my previous work… Payment i got for last month was for 9000 dollars… Great thing about this job is the more time i got to spend with my family… KORTA.NU/MDe