The road is long
With many a winding turn
That leads us to who knows where
Who knows when
But I’m strong
Strong enough to carry him
He ain’t heavy, he’s my brother

So on we go
His welfare is of my concern
No burden is he to bear
We’ll get there
For I know
He would not encumber me
He ain’t heavy, he’s my brother

He Ain’t Heavy, He’s My Brother,” by The Hollies (1969)

He sure feels like he’s heavy. From The Wall Street Journal this morning, “U.S. Growth Starts Year in Familiar Rut.” “A sharp pullback in business investment and weak global demand dragged down an already-lackluster U.S. economy in the opening months of 2016, the latest setback in a bumpy expansion entering its seventh year.” That marked the economy’s worst performance in two years. More here.

Last week we looked at structural issues. Specifically, the oversupply glut of 3 billion workers competing for the work that 800 million workers were doing before the internet opened the world to the emerging market supply chain. Think China’s massive infrastructure build out – the excess manufacturing and labor capabilities and also think about Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and India. Fifteen dollar per hour wages are not going to fly when there are people doing the same thing for $15 per day.

The big consumers are the developed countries and some of the biggest consumers (well, you and me) are here in the U.S. But older we get and the demographic winds require more savings and less spending. We already bought a lot of the stuff.

Last week I promised you a “Cliffs Notes” version of Lacy Hunt’s latest letter as well as some thoughts from Gary Shilling. They are two of my favorite analysts. So let’s jump on in and make this week’s letter a quick and to the point read. Grab that coffee and find your favorite chair.

? If you are not signed up to receive my weekly On My Radar e-newsletter, you can subscribe here. ?

Included in this week’s On My Radar:

  • Lacy Hunt
  • Gary Shilling
  • We Are Heading Towards Negative Interest Rates
  • Trade Signals – Fed Leaves Rates Unchanged

Lacy Hunt

Here are a number of bullet point highlights from Hunt’s April letter:

  • The striking aspect of the U.S. economy’s 2015 performance was weaker economic growth coinciding with a massive advance in nonfinancial debt.
  • Nominal GDP, the broadest and most reliable indicator of economic performance, rose $549 billion in 2015 while U.S. nonfinancial debt surged $1.912 trillion.
  • Accordingly, nonfinancial debt rose 3.5 times faster than GDP last year. This means that we can expect continued sub-par growth for the U.S. economy.
  • The ratio of nonfinancial debt-to-GDP rose to a record year-end level of 248.6%.
  • During the four and a half decades prior to 2000, it took about $1.70 of debt to generate $1.00 of GDP. Since 2000, however, when the nonfinancial debt-to-GDP ratio reached deleterious levels, it has taken on average, $3.30 of debt to generate $1.00 of GDP.
  • This suggests that the type and efficiency of the new debt is increasingly non-productive.
  • Debt is always a shift from future spending to the present.
  • Thus, while the debt helped to prop up economic growth in 2015, this small plus will be turned into a longer lasting negative that will diminish any benefit from last year’s debt bulge.
  • Household debt was lower.
  • Last year, business debt, excluding off balance sheet liabilities, rose $793 billion, while total gross private domestic investment (which includes fixed and inventory investment) rose only $93Thus, by inference this debt increase went into share buybacks, dividend increases and other financial endeavors, albeit corporate cash flow declined by $224 billion.
  • When business debt is allocated to financial operations, it does not generate an income stream to meet interest and repayment requirements. Such a usage of debt does not support economic growth, employment, higher paying jobs or productivity growth.
  • Thus, the economy is likely to be weakened by the increase of business debt over the past five years.
  • In 2015, the ratio of business debt-to-GDP advanced two percentage points to 70.4%, far above the historical average of 51.7%.
  • Only once in the past 63 years has this ratio been higher than in 2015. That year was 2008.
  • The jump in corporate debt, combined with falling profits and rising difficulties in meeting existing debt obligations, indicates that capital budgets, hiring plans and inventory investment will be scaled back in 2016 and possibly even longer.
  • Indeed, various indicators already confirm that this process is underway.
  • U.S. Government gross debt, excluding off balance sheet items, reached $18.9 trillion at year-end 2015, an amount equal to 104% of GDP, up from 103% in 2014 and considerably above the 63-year average of 55.2%.

SB here: I’d like to make special note of Lacy’s next point:

“The divergence between the budget deficit and debt in 2015 is a portent of things to come. This subject is directly addressed in the 2012 book The Clash of Generations, published by MIT Press, authored by Laurence Kotlikoff and Scott Burns. They calculate that on a net present value basis, the U.S. government faces liabilities for Social Security and other entitlement programs that exceed the funds in the various trust funds by $60 trillion. This sum is more than three times greater than the current level of GDP.”

  • They substantiate that, although these liabilities are not on the balance sheet, they are very real and will have a significant impact on future years’ budget deliberations.
  • According to the Congressional Budget Office, over the next 11 years, federal debt will rise to $30 trillion, an increase of about $10 trillion from the January 2016 level, due to long understood commitments made under Social Security, Medicare and the Affordable Care Act.
  • Any kind of recession in this time frame will boost federal debt even more.
  • More than a dozen serious studies indicate this will drain U.S. economic growth as federal debt moves increasingly beyond its detrimental impact point of approximately 90% of GDP.
  • Over-indebtedness Impairs Global Monetary Policy: The Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan and the People’s Bank of China have been unable to gain traction with their monetary policies.
  • Excluding off balance sheet liabilities, at year-end, the ratio of total public and private debt relative to GDP stood at 350%, 370%, 457% and 615%, for China, the United States, the Eurocurrency zone, and Japan, respectively.
  • Lacy concludes:

Our economic view for 2016 remains unchanged. The composition of last year’s debt gain indicates that velocity will decline more sharply in 2016 than 2015. The modest Fed tightening is a slight negative for both M2 growth and velocity.

Additionally, velocity appears to have dropped even faster in the first quarter of 2016 than in the fourth quarter of 2015. Thus, nominal GDP growth should slow to a 2.3% – 2.8% range for the year. The slower pace in nominal GDP would continue the 2014-15 pattern, when the rate of rise in nominal GDP decelerated from 3.9% to 3.1%.

Such slow top-line growth suggests that spurts in inflation will simply reduce real GDP growth and thus be transitory in nature.

Acordingly, the prospects for the Treasury bond market remain bright for patient investors who operate with a multi-year investment horizon. As we have written many times, numerous factors can cause intermittent increases in yields, but the domestic and global economic environments remain too weak for yields to remain elevated.

Source: Hoisington Quarterly Review and Outlook

Gary Shilling

The above section was long with a lot of data. Gary is smart thinking with a solid long-term record of getting the major themes right. I share a high-level summary of his thinking from his latest letter. You can subscribe to his research letter here (to be clear, I have no financial affiliation with Gary. Just a fan.)

Back Where We Started: We believe the pessimism over the economic outlook and nervousness in financial markets was overdone early this year, but so too is the more recent euphoria. The U.S. economy will probably continue to grow at about a 2% annual rate, better than most developed countries but constrained by ongoing financial deleveraging, deceleration in China and worldwide excess capacity, especially in commodities with the resulting price weakness. The economies and finances of emerging countries will remain under pressure while deflation looms and the dollar is likely to strengthen.

Monotonous slow growth would be breached on the downside if oil prices collapse to our $10 to $20 per barrel target and precipitate financial woes and global recession. On the other side, voter frustration in North America and Europe over the past decade of no real income growth, shown by the rise of populist politicians, may spur economic growth via fiscal stimuli. (Source: Gary Shilling)

We are hearing more and more about fiscal stimulus. That day remains postponed.

Gary suggests several tradable ideas in his letter. With many of them, I concur. As noted above, he is bearish on oil and commodities in general. He too feels interest rates are heading lower. I remain in that camp. To that end, as was noted in Wednesday’s Trade Signals post, the Zweig Bond Model remains in a buy signal. (NOTE: NOT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY SECURITY. Talk with your financial advisor about investment suitability.)

We are Heading Towards Negative Interest Rates

To this end, zero real interest rates predict zero real returns and negative real interest rates predict negative real returns. Research Affiliates puts it this way:

  • For long-term investors, risk is more about failing to meet wealth accumulation goals than about short-term changes in the price of their portfolios; thus, the more appropriate measure of risk is the estimated probability of reaching or failing to reach the desired or needed long-term real return level.
  • Given the new NIRP environment, investors may wish to look beyond a traditional 60/40 portfolio to a portfolio holding substantial allocations in non-U.S. equities, alternatives and credit. (Emphasis mine.)

Negative interest rates penalize savings. Savings lead to investment and investment to productivity and growth.

We need tax reform and we need infrastructure investment and this is only something that our elected officials can initiate. Expect more of the same for now. Watch for movement on the fiscal front. Specifically, lower taxes and infrastructure spend.

Stick to the plan.

Negative Interest Rates

Trade Signals – Fed Leaves Rates Unchanged

Click the following link to review of the most recent equity, fixed income, economic and tactical Trade Signals.

Here is a link to the Trade Signals blog page.

Personal Note

I was on Fox Business News – Countdown to the Closing Bell with Liz Claman earlier this week to discuss the upcoming Fed announcement, valuations and probable forward stock and bond returns and what investors can do to improve their portfolio positioning.

I took my seat and Liz says, I want you to punch it (high energy). Let’s talk about recession and how that will impact a client’s portfolio. That was the plan until Fox broke away to a breaking news story. There was police activity on the White House lawn. Bad timing and it turned out to be a non-event. The interview was cut short; however, I’m promised a return.

Recession timing and valuations are much easier topics than politics. Glad I wasn’t asked about Trump, Cruz, Hillary or Sanders. You can see the interview by clicking on the link below.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4864438880001/where-to-allocate-capital-amid-fears-of-recession/?%20-%20sp=show-clips.#sp=show-clips

A kind invite to attend the SALT Conference on May 11-13 in Las Vegas has come my way and the lineup is just too good to pass up. The event kicks off with private equity great David Rubenstein, co-founder of the Carlyle Group. Other notables include Leon Cooperman, Ken Griffin, Michael Bloomberg, Sam Zell and T. Boone Pickens.

Topics vary and there is always much to learn. Along with the heavyweights, I’ve circled several sessions I intend to sit in on such as: Identifying Opportunity Sets Amid Market Volatility, Identifying Investment Opportunities for the Year Ahead and Mapping the Course: An Investor’s Guide to Capital Preservation in an Age of Uncertainty.

I’ll be sure to share my notes with you.

A quick day trip to Chicago follows in mid-May and I’ll be seeing Lacy Hunt and Gary Shilling, among others, in Dallas at John Mauldin’s Strategic Investment Conference on May 24-27. A fun month is ahead.

Let me know if you are going to the SALT and/or Mauldin’s Conferences. Let’s grab a coffee.

? If you are not signed up to receive my weekly On My Radar e-newsletter, you can subscribe here. ?

Remember that “it’s a long, long road with many a winding turn.” It’s a marathon and not a sprint. Minimizing loss along the path will allow the magic of compound interest to work in your favor. The market right now – well, “he is heavy.”

Have a great weekend!

Steve

Stephen B. Blumenthal
Chairman & CEO
CMG Capital Management Group, Inc.

Stephen Blumenthal founded CMG Capital Management Group in 1992 and serves today as its Chairman and CEO. Steve authors a free weekly e-letter entitled, On My Radar. The letter is designed to bring clarity on the economy, interest rates, valuations and market trend and what that all means in regards to investment opportunities and portfolio positioning. Click here to receive his free weekly e-letter.

Social Media Links:

CMG is committed to setting a high standard for ETF strategists. And we’re passionate about educating advisors and investors about tactical investing. We launched CMG AdvisorCentral a year ago to share our knowledge of tactical investing and managing a successful advisory practice.

You can sign up for weekly updates to AdvisorCentral here. If you’re looking for the CMG white paper, “Understanding Tactical Investment Strategies,” you can find that here.

AdvisorCentral is being updated with new educational resources we look forward to sharing with you. You can always connect with CMG on Twitter at @askcmg and follow our LinkedIn Showcase page devoted to tactical investing.

A Note on Investment Process:

From an investment management perspective, I’ve followed, managed and written about trend following and investor sentiment for many years. I find that reviewing various sentiment, trend and other historically valuable rules-based indicators each week helps me to stay balanced and disciplined in allocating to the various risk sets that are included within a broadly diversified total portfolio solution.

My objective is to position in line with the equity and fixed income market’s primary trends. I believe risk management is paramount in a long-term investment process. When to hedge, when to become more aggressive, etc.

Trade Signals History:

Trade Signals started after a colleague asked me if I could share my thoughts (Trade Signals) with him. A number of years ago, I found that putting pen to paper has really helped me in my investment management process and I hope that this research is of value to you in your investment process.

Following are several links to learn more about the use of options:

For hedging, I favor a collared option approach (writing out-of-the-money covered calls and buying out-of-the-money put options) as a relatively inexpensive way to risk protect your long-term focused equity portfolio exposure. Also, consider buying deep out-of-the-money put options for risk protection.

Please note the comments at the bottom of Trade Signals discussing a collared option strategy to hedge equity exposure using investor sentiment extremes is a guide to entry and exit. Go towww.CBOE.com to learn more. Hire an experienced advisor to help you. Never write naked option positions. We do not offer options strategies at CMG.

Several other links:

http://www.theoptionsguide.com/the-collar-strategy.aspx

https://www.trademonster.com/marketing/upcomingWebinarEvents.action?src=TRADA2&PC=TRADA2&gclid=CKna3Puu6rwCFTRo7AodRiQAlw

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended and/or undertaken by CMG Capital Management Group, Inc. (or any of its related entities, together “CMG”) will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. No portion of the content should be construed as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. References to specific securities, investment programs or funds are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities.

Certain portions of the content may contain a discussion of, and/or provide access to, opinions and/or recommendations of CMG (and those of other investment and non-investment professionals) as of a specific prior date. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, such discussion may no longer be reflective of current recommendations or opinions. Derivatives and options strategies are not suitable for every investor, may involve a high degree of risk, and may be appropriate investments only for sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained herein serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from CMG or the professional advisors of your choosing. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisors of his/her choosing. CMG is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice.

This presentation does not discuss, directly or indirectly, the amount of the profits or losses, realized or unrealized, by any CMG client from any specific funds or securities. Please note: In the event that CMG references performance results for an actual CMG portfolio, the results are reported net of advisory fees and inclusive of dividends. The performance referenced is that as determined and/or provided directly by the referenced funds and/or publishers, have not been independently verified, and do not reflect the performance of any specific CMG client. CMG clients may have experienced materially different performance based upon various factors during the corresponding time periods. Mutual funds involve risk including possible loss of principal. An investor should consider the fund’s investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. This and other information about the CMG Global Equity FundTM, CMG Tactical Bond FundTM, CMG Global Macro Strategy FundTM and the CMG Long/Short FundTM is contained in each fund’s prospectus, which can be obtained by calling 1-866-CMG-9456 (1-866-264-9456). Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. The CMG Global Equity FundTM, CMG Tactical Bond FundTM, CMG Global Macro Strategy FundTM and the CMG Long/Short FundTM are distributed by Northern Lights Distributors, LLC, Member FINRA.

NOT FDIC INSURED. MAY LOSE VALUE. NO BANK GUARANTEE.

Hypothetical Presentations: To the extent that any portion of the content reflects hypothetical results that were achieved by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model, such results have inherent limitations, including: (1) the model results do not reflect the results of actual trading using client assets, but were achieved by means of the retroactive application of the referenced models, certain aspects of which may have been designed with the benefit of hindsight; (2) back-tested performance may not reflect the impact that any material market or economic factors might have had on the adviser’s use of the model if the model had been used during the period to actually manage client assets; and (3) CMG’s clients may have experienced investment results during the corresponding time periods that were materially different from those portrayed in the model. Please Also Note: Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that future performance will be profitable, or equal to any corresponding historical index. (e.g., S&P 500® Total Return or Dow Jones Wilshire U.S. 5000 Total Market Index) is also disclosed. For example, the S&P 500® Total Return Index (the “S&P 500®”) is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 widely held stocks often used as a proxy for the stock market. S&P Dow Jones chooses the member companies for the S&P 500® based on market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. Included are the common stocks of industrial, financial, utility, and transportation companies. The historical performance results of the S&P 500® (and those of or all indices) and the model results do not reflect the deduction of transaction and custodial charges, nor the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing indicated historical performance results. For example, the deduction combined annual advisory and transaction fees of 1.00% over a 10-year period would decrease a 10% gross return to an 8.9% net return. The S&P 500® is not an index into which an investor can directly invest. The historical S&P 500® performance results (and those of all other indices) are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only, so as to provide general comparative information to assist an individual in determining whether the performance of a specific portfolio or model meets, or continues to meet, his/her investment objective(s). A corresponding description of the other comparative indices, are available from CMG upon request. It should not be assumed that any CMG holdings will correspond directly to any such comparative index. The model and indices performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes. CMG portfolios may be more or less volatile than the reflective indices and/or models.

In the event that there has been a change in an individual’s investment objective or financial situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with his/her investment professional.

Written Disclosure Statement. CMG is an SEC-registered investment adviser located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. Stephen B. Blumenthal is CMG’s founder and CEO. Please note: The above views are those of CMG and its CEO, Stephen Blumenthal, and do not reflect those of any sub-advisor that CMG may engage to manage any CMG strategy. A copy of CMG’s current written disclosure statement discussing advisory services and fees is available upon request or via CMG’s internet web site at www.cmgwealth.com/disclosures.

© CMG Capital Management Group