Home Value Investing PV Crystalox Solar – Liquidation play

PV Crystalox Solar – Liquidation play

Advertisement Disclosure: When you purchase through our sponsored links, we may earn a commission from our partners. By using this website you agree to our T&Cs.

By Deep Value investments @DeepValueInv

Added a 9% portfolio weight to PVCS at 21.68p a share.

This is a solar manufacturer which has just won an arbitration case against a customer who refused to pay up.  This has been quite well covered in the Investors Chronicle and elsewhere so only a short post on this.

Their market cap is £34.7m.  The arbitration win is worth £30m, less the cost of 22.9m solar wafers the company is supposed to supply.  Looking at http://pvinsights.com/ the most that can cost is $0.80 a wafer, lowest $0.60.  This gives a net payment of £30-£13.6/£10.2.  This means a payment of £16.4 – £19.8m.

The award is supposedly binding – via the ICC.  I don’t think there is any appeals procedure.

As at the interims the company held €27.86m worth of cash – or £24.5m.

They also hold €7m of inventories, from the 2016 Annual report some of this is silicon wafer – held at estimated selling cost.  Depending on exact specifications I would imagine that could be used to settle the liability of 22.9m wafers the company is supposed to supply.

In addition they have €2.3m accounts receivable / prepaid expenses and a €2.9m payable.

If we net all this out we get to a further £5.6m.

So the valuation comes to £46.5m – £49.9 – less a bit (£2m?) for ongoing costs / wind up costs – so we are at £0.28 to £0.30p a share – or hopefully a 30% – 38% profit.

There might be more in this than that.  They have £70.5m worth of plant – written down to £1.7m in the 2016 accounts.  Is this really only worth that ? I suspect it could be worth more, but I dont have any real evidence of or for this.

There may be a marginally profitable business here – they made £1.3m EBIT in 2016.  I personally would prefer the business wound up.

The company has also lost £88m since 2011.  This may create tax loss carry forwards worth something to somebody.  I am not an expert in this area at all so it’s only a hypothesis.

Shareholders – Management own 27%, Funds 30%, others the rest so management are not overly dominant and may act rationally in respect of the capital.  The outcome of a strategic review is due shortly – hopefully this will act as a positive catalyst.

As ever comments are appreciated.

Our Editorial Standards

At ValueWalk, we’re committed to providing accurate, research-backed information. Our editors go above and beyond to ensure our content is trustworthy and transparent.

Investing

Which Stocks Should You Buy, and Sell, in 2026?

Dave Kovaleski5 months

Also, the 3 sectors that Wall Street analysts are most bullish about. The usual suspects dominated in 2025 as both the Communication Services and Information Technology sectors helped boost the...