Frank Voisin is a value investor and independent analyst whose site, Frankly Speaking, contains Frank’s investment theses as well as educational material to help investors avoid value traps. Subscribe to Frank’s feed here.
MicroFinancial Incorporated (NASDAQ:MFI) leases commercial equipment valued between $500 and $25,000 to a range of lessees. MFI does not purchase equipment until a potential lessee actually enters into a lease, at which point MFI buys the equipment from its dealer network, and MFI doesn’t see the equipment again until the end of the lease.
It is currently trading at a discount to NCAV of approximately 17%, has a P/E of approximately 11, has remained profitable throughout the recession and has the most conservative balance sheet in its industry (D/E of 0.87, whereas competitors like NICK and MRLN are at 1.12 and 1.24 respectively).
Khrom Capital was up 32.5% gross and 24.5% net for the first quarter, outperforming the Russell 2000's 21.2% gain and the S&P 500's 6.2% increase. The fund has an annualized return of 21.6% gross and 16.5% net since inception. The total gross return since inception is 1,194%. Q1 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Read More
Substantially all of MFI’s leases are noncancelable and they last on average 44months. The average yield on these leases in 2009 was 27.7%, down from a high of 38.1% in 2001, but only slightly below 2008 (28.5%) and 2007 (29%). At these high rates and given the small price of the equipment, it is clear that the customer has low credit quality and few other options. This contributes to a fairly high level of charge-offs, with a five year average of about $18m/year, though the company has a decent recovery rate of about $5m/year making the net effect around $13m (slightly less, since I’ve been rounding). The company provides for charge-offs at a rate of about $12.5m/year (5yr avg) which is pretty close to the net charge-offs.
The company’s other strengths include its improvement in charge-offs, delinquencies and SG&A:
- Improvement in Charge-offs. The company went through a period of relatively high charge-offs, specifically from 2003 to 2006 when charge-offs ran 30 – 50% of gross investments. In 2009, these figures were just 11%. However, the company has been reducing its provisions for losses faster than its charge-offs have been improving (especially in the last year, when charge-offs have actually ticked up a bit). I would rather see management be more conservative with their provisioning.
- Improvement in Delinquencies. The most recent quarter witnessed a decrease in delinquencies, as those leases past due declined 410bp (the bulk of this being the worst delinquencies, those over 90 days overdue, which declined 310bp).
- Improvement in SG&A: We have seen an improvement in the company’s SG&A over the last several years, to the lowest rate in the last decade (26% in the most recent quarter, 29% in 2009 overall).
The company pays a dividend which currently yields 5% and their board recently (last Q) approved a new share repurchase program of up to 250,000 shares, both of which are shareholder friendly actions.
MFI’s weaknesses include the fact that its average yield has declined rather dramatically (as mentioned above), that actual charge-offs have increased this year, and that the company has a substantial amount of dilutive options outstanding. Additionally, the company’s varied operational performance historically has made it impossible to project forward with any accuracy. The result is that it can only be valued on its assets, and unfortunately its discount is insufficient to provide much of a margin of safety (I would need at least 1/3 discount for a company with an operating history like this). What are your thoughts?
Talk to Frank about MFI
Author Disclosure: No Position.