Whitney Tilson’s email to investors discussing Buffett and Munger in fine form; The biggest risk to Berkshire; Why I keep going to the annual meetings; Pictures from the weekend; My one disappointment; Berkshire’s first-quarter earnings.
1) I got back late Sunday from a great weekend in Omaha, Nebraska. It was my 22nd consecutive Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting.
This Tiger Cub Giant Is Betting On Banks And Tech Stocks In The Recovery
The first two months of the third quarter were the best months for D1 Capital Partners' public portfolio since inception, that's according to a copy of the firm's August update, which ValueWalk has been able to review. Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more According to the update, D1's public portfolio returned 20.1% gross Read More
Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger were in fine form, displaying their razor-sharp minds as they answered dozens of questions from the panel of analysts and journalists as well as the audience. It's remarkable to see these wise old men, at 88 and 95, getting better with age!
This won't always be the case, of course, and it's something I monitor closely. I've long said that the greatest risk to Berkshire isn't that Buffett gets hit by the proverbial bus. Not to be morbid, but most people don't die suddenly – rather, they slowly fade away, both physically and mentally. Berkshire's value could be seriously impaired if Buffett starts to lose it mentally and makes one or more large, ill-advised investments.
It's certainly possible that Buffett might not recognize his own mental decline (or refuse to acknowledge it because he loves his work so much) and the board fails to act, perhaps rationalizing that a diminished Buffett is still better than anyone else.
Buffett is aware of this risk and has instructed Berkshire's board members, both publicly and privately, that their most important job is to "take away the keys" if they see him losing it.
I trust that both Buffett and the board will act rationally, but also view it as my job to independently observe and evaluate him to make sure I'm comfortable that he's still at the top of his game.
The good news is, based on what I saw this weekend, he's never been better.
2) I'm often asked why I keep coming to the annual meetings, especially since I freely acknowledge that nothing really changes: It's pretty much the same people asking the same questions and getting the same answers!
In part, it's because I have a lot of fun catching up with old friends and making new ones. Plus, even after more than two decades studying Buffett and Munger intensively, I find that I still keep learning from them.
In the early days of my career, I was so inexperienced – and they were such brilliant, inspiring, and patient teachers! Had I not absorbed all of the investing lessons they imparted, I never would have achieved anything close to the success I did.
I've come to realize, though, that the most important things I've learned (and continue to learn) from these wise men go beyond investing into what Munger calls "worldly wisdom," which is the key to succeeding in the larger game of life.
At its core, this wisdom is rooted in some simple concepts: become a lifelong learner, develop good habits, be nice to everyone, marry the right person and keep that relationship strong, avoid calamities, etc. But, like investing, while these concepts are simple in concept, they can be difficult in practice. So it's always good to hear Buffett and Munger's wisdom every year.
3) Here are some of my pictures from the weekend:
In them are screenshots of my interview with Yahoo Finance at the lunch break of the meeting... me hanging out with various friends and family, including my uncle, cousin, and his wife... Chris Stavrou, who was attending his 34th consecutive meeting (he first bought Berkshire in the 1970s at $211 and his average cost on the shares he owns today is $1,780)... Guy Spier... Lloyd Khaner... and my analysts Steve Culbertson and Kevin DeCamp.
Two of the pictures are from the "Invest in Yourself" 5K race on Sunday morning, which was great fun. There were 3,150 official runners (and a lot of unofficial ones). I finished in 23:33 (a 7:35-per-mile pace), good enough for 151st overall (top 5%) and 10th of 164 men in my age group (50-54).
4) My one disappointment from the weekend was that I didn't get to ask a question. I've asked a dozen over the past two decades – more than anyone – and being a competitive guy, I was looking forward to adding to my lead!
There's a lottery at each microphone, so you have to get lucky and be one of the first two names picked. Twelve of us were waiting at microphone 11 in the overflow room, so my odds weren't good. But to my delight, I was No. 2, so I prepared this question, to which I was eager to hear Buffett and Munger's thoughts:
My question is about self-driving cars.
Last week Tesla announced that, within a year, its cars will have full Level 5 self-driving capabilities – meaning a steering wheel would be superfluous.
It also announced that, pending regulatory approval, it will have a fleet of a million robotaxis by the end of next year.
This timeline is years more aggressive than that of any other carmaker.
Do you have an opinion on how quickly any automaker will be able to offer truly autonomous driving, meaning you'll be able to get in your car in Omaha and drive to LA or New York without touching the wheel even once?
And regardless of the timeline, what are your thoughts on how this will affect two major Berkshire holdings:
First, could self-driving trucks reduce the huge cost advantage railroads have over trucks?
And second, if autonomous cars get in far fewer accidents, could this hurt GEICO's business?
For whatever reason, however, Buffett and Munger were moving more slowly through the questions this year. They took the question from microphone 10 at 3:25 p.m., so it looked like I was going to be the last question before the meeting ended at 3:30. But then they gave a super-long answer and ended the meeting. ARRRRHHHHHH!!!
- You can ignore the huge headline profits of $21.7 billion, as most of that was due to gains in the stock portfolio, reversing most of the fourth-quarter losses. Over time, the performance of Berkshire's stock portfolio is an important driver of value, but quarter-to-quarter swings are meaningless.
- Operating income was only up 5% in the first quarter. But this didn't include Kraft Heinz (KHC), which hasn't filed its annual 10-K or first-quarter earnings due to accounting issues. In the first quarter of 2018, Berkshire's earnings from KHC were $265 million. KHC has been struggling, but even if you add only $200 million for last quarter, Berkshire's operating earnings would have been up 9% year-over-year.
- Float was up a healthy 7% year-over-year.
- Share repurchases were only $1.6 billion – a bit disappointing, but Munger said they'll be "more liberal" in the future, and Buffett said he'd love to buy back a ton of stock if it was 25%-30% undervalued.
- Berkshire is roughly 10% undervalued today, which is hard to get excited about, but the company is super safe and the share repurchases going forward should provide somewhat of a floor.
There's been a lot of talk about Berkshire stock underperforming, but this is nonsense. This chart shows Berkshire versus the S&P 500 Index over the past decade since the market bottomed on March 9, 2009...
As you can see, Berkshire has kept up almost exactly with the market, which is incredible performance in my opinion, given that: a) Berkshire is ultra-conservative, with a huge cash hoard... and b) the market has been driven by a handful of big tech stocks.
To be clear, this is a "stay rich" stock, not a "get rich" stock. I think it will continue to keep up in a rising market and outperform meaningfully in a bear market.
Glenn's follow-up comments; Mercedes-Benz EQC
1) In response to Glenn’s analysis that I shared today, one reader wrote:
You missed one part that the same banks will lend the shares to the convertible bond guys and earn additional fees.
Regardless, the CB is not as cheap as you say. CB holders are not getting 8.5% if they want to hedge credit risk by buying credit-default swaps.
Call spread is generally the norm in tech names so nothing unusual there
I know. I was simplifying that part. Not everyone wants the CDS – the short is enough. If someone bought CDS, they would have done smaller short. And of course who makes the CDS fees? This is a banker honey pot.
It is standard structure but 2% interest that with a conversion price up only 27.5% is the worst pricing I have seen. Especially so for a company with this vol. The interest rate was likely a full percentage point too high and the convert price should have been at least 35% above the current share price in my view.
2) From a friend:
Here’s Daimler’s press release about its new EV: Mercedes-Benz EQC sales release & start of production: Electrified Mercedes hits the road
Note the German price including VAT: “net basic price of less than €60,000” – that’s $67,210.
Also, apparently the European range rating on the new WTLP cycle is BETTER than that of the base Model X!
[WLTP: The worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure is a global harmonized standard for determining the levels of pollutants and CO₂ emissions, fuel or energy consumption, and electric range from light-duty vehicles. See this website for details.]