5 Incredible Charts Proving Apple’s Dominance

Charts of Apple’s dominance  by John Szramiak was originally published on Vintage Value Investing

There’s been a ton of talk about Amazon in the media lately following the company’s announcement that it will buy Whole Foods for $13.7 billion. It indeed does look like Amazon is headed towards world dominance (Warren Buffett might even agree).

Get our full guide on moat investing in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on moat investing in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues.

moat

Einhorn’s FOF Re-positions Portfolio, Makes New Seed Investment In Year Marked By “Speculative Exuberance”

david einhorn, reading, valuewalk, internet, investment research, Greenlight Capital, hedge funds, Greenlight Masters, famous hedge fund owners, big value investors, websites, books, reading financials, investment analysis, shortselling, investment conferences, shorting, short biasIt has not just been rough year for David Einhorn's own fund. Einhorn's Greenlight Masters fund of hedge funds was down 3% net for the first half of 2020, matching the S&P 500's return for those six months. In his August letter to investors, which was reviewed by ValueWalk, the Greenlight Masters team noted that Read More


But for now Apple still remains on top. It’s still the country’s most profitable company (with profits of ~$45 billion compared to #2 J.P. Morgan Chase and #3 Berkshire Hathaway with ~$24 billion each) and in terms of market cap (with a market cap ~$750 billion compared to #4 Amazon with ~$470 billion).

The 5 charts below are incredible interesting, and help prove just how dominant Apple still is:

1. The iPhone is One of the Best-Selling Products in History

Apple launched the iPhone in June 2007, unleashing a smartphone revolution that has changed the way people work and socialize, while reshaping industries of all sorts (from music to hotels). Ten years later, the iPhone has become one of the best-selling products in history: since its launch, Apple has sold about 1.3 billion units, generating more than $800 billion in revenue.

Apple

Source: WSJ

2. Since Its Introduction, the iPhone Has Come to Overshadow Apple’s Other Products

The iPhone now accounts for two-thirds of Apple’s sales, making the company now overly dependent on just one product line and overshadowing all of Apple’s other products. Any big stumble with the iPhone could be disastrous for Apple.

However, the iPhone has also created Apple’s second-largest business in terms of revenue: apps and other services offerings. Since the App Store launched in 2008, app sales have generated roughly $100 billion in revenue for Apple from over 16 million app developers world-wide (Apple has historically taken a 30% cut of all App Store sales, and more recently has begun charging a $99/year subscription to developers).

According to longtime Apple adviser and Steve Jobs confidant Regis McKenna, the iPhone has become “the razor and the blades are the software services… It creates this great annuity business.”

Source: WSJ

3. Apple Has Grown Like Crazy Across Nearly Every Dimension

As revenue has skyrocketed, so has Apple’s staff. The company hired about 100,000 people in the 10-year span since the launch of the iPhone, bringing its global workforce to 116,000 from 18,000 in 2006.

Apple’s sales from China have also grown to become a huge slice of the overall pie. In 2006, all of Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan) accounted for 7% of Apple’s revenue. Then when the iPhone hit Chinese shelves in 2009, it became a status symbol for Chinese consumers and took off. Last year, China alone accounted for 23% of Apple’s revenue… or $48.5 billion, which was greater than Coca-Cola’s total revenue world-wide. Now, however, some analysts worry that Apple is too reliant on sales from China.

Source: WSJ

4. Apple is a Money-Making Machine

The chart below shows the top 100 largest companies by market cap. The outside circles represent revenue and the inside colored circles represent profit for each company. Notice anything strange?

Look at the size of Apple’s cirlces. Apple is unparalleled in its ability to make money. In fact, Apple’s 2016 profit of $45 billion is far bigger than any other company, including Berkshire Hathaway ($24 billion), JPMorgan Chase ($24 billion), Wells Fargo ($22 billion), Alphabet ($19 billion), Samsung ($19 billion), Toyota ($17 billion), Johnson & Johnson ($16 billion), or Walmart ($14 billion).

Also impressive: Apple’s profits are bigger than the revenues of massive companies like Coca-Cola ($41.5 billion) and Facebook ($27.6 billion). The only companies that can compare with Apple’s profitability are Chinese banks like ICBC, Agricultural Bank of China, or China Construction Bank… state-owned enterprises that don’t exactly compete on the same level playing field.

Source: Ishtyaq Habib

5. Most of Apple’s Cash is Held Overseas

Apple has over $250 billion of cash sitting on its balance sheet. An astounding $240 billion of that – or 93% – is held overseas. If Apple wanted to bring that money back into the United States (called repatriation), it would have to pay a standard 35% corporate tax rate on that money to the U.S. government.

Although still short on details, President Trump wants to pass a tax reform plan that would encourage companies that have been stockpiling cash overseas (and not paying U.S. taxes) to bring that money back home. At one point during the campaign Trump proposed a one-time tax of 10% on offshore earnings.

The repatriated money could then be used for share buybacks, dividends, acquisitions, and capital spending. If repatriation tax rates are lowered, Apple would be by far one of the biggest beneficiaries.

Source: Bloomberg

 

Previous articleBlackBerry QNX Sales Could Rise To $16 Per Vehicle In FY20
Next articleExplosion At Brussels Train Station [REPORT]
Ben Graham, the father of value investing, wasn’t born in this century. Nor was he born in the last century. Benjamin Graham – born Benjamin Grossbaum – was born in London, England in 1894. He published the value investing bible Security Analysis in 1934, which was followed by the value investing New Testament The Intelligent Investor in 1949. Warren Buffett, the value investing messiah and Graham’s most famous and successful disciple, was born in 1930 and attended Graham’s classes at Columbia in 1950-51. And the not-so-prodigal son Charlie Munger even has Warren beat by six years – he was born in 1924. I’m not trying to give a history lesson here, but I find these dates very interesting. Value investing is an old strategy. It’s been around for a long time, long before the Capital Asset Pricing Model, long before the Black-Scholes Model, long before CLO’s, long before the founders of today’s hottest high-tech IPOs were even born. And yet people have very short term memories. Once a bull market gets some legs in it, the quest to get “the most money as quickly as possible” causes prices to get bid up. Human nature kicks in and dollar signs start appearing in people’s eyes. New methodologies are touted and fundamental principles are left in the rear view mirror. “Today is always the dawning of a new age. Things are different than they were yesterday. The world is changing and we must adapt.” Yes, all very true statements but the new and “fool-proof” methods and strategies and overleveraging and excess risk-taking only work when the economic environmental conditions allow them to work. Using the latest “fool-proof” investment strategy is like running around a thunderstorm with a lightning rod in your hand: if you’re unharmed after a while then it might seem like you’ve developed a method to avoid getting struck by lightning – but sooner or later you will get hit. And yet value investors are for the most part immune to the thunder and lightning. This isn’t at all to say that value investors never lose money, go bust, or suffer during recessions. However, by sticking to fundamentals and avoiding excessive risk-taking (i.e. dumb decisions), the collective value investor class seems to have much fewer examples of the spectacular crash-and-burn cases that often are found with investors’ who employ different strategies. As a result, value investors have historically outperformed other types of investors over the long term. And there is plenty of empirical evidence to back this up. Check this and this and this and this out. In fact, since 1926 value stocks have outperformed growth stocks by an average of four percentage points annually, according to the authoritative index compiled by finance professors Eugene Fama of the University of Chicago and Kenneth French of Dartmouth College. So, the value investing philosophy has endured for over 80 years and is the most consistently successful strategy that can be applied. And while hot stocks, over-leveraged portfolios, and the newest complicated financial strategies will come and go, making many wishful investors rich very quick and poor even quicker, value investing will quietly continue to help its adherents fatten their wallets. It will always endure and will always remain classically in fashion. In other words, value investing is vintage. Which explains half of this website’s name. As for the value part? The intention of this site is to explain, discuss, ask, learn, teach, and debate those topics and questions that I’ve always been most interested in, and hopefully that you’re most curious about, too. This includes: What is value investing? Value investing strategies Stock picks Company reviews Basic financial concepts Investor profiles Investment ideas Current events Economics Behavioral finance And, ultimately, ways to become a better investor I want to note the importance of the way I use value here. It’s not the simplistic definition of “low P/E” stocks that some financial services lazily use to classify investors, which the word “value” has recently morphed into meaning. To me, value investing equates to the term “Intelligent Investing,” as described by Ben Graham. Intelligent investing involves analyzing a company’s fundamentals and can be characterized by an intense focus on a stock’s price, it’s intrinsic value, and the very important ratio between the two. This is value investing as the term was originally meant to be used decades ago, and is the only way it should be used today. So without much further ado, it’s my very good honor to meet you and you may call me…