Have you ever wondered who these people are? The people who decide how much capital should cost, how much credit and cash should be issued. You know, the twits who dream up QE, ZIRP and NIRP.
Where do they come from? Who pays their wages? Where do they get these hair-brained ideas? Are they on medication?
Sadly we probably know most of the answers…
The Children's Investment Fund Management LLP is a London-based hedge fund firm better known by its acronym TCI. Founded by Sir Chris Hohn in 2003, the fund has a global mandate and supports the Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF). Q3 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more The CIFF was established in 2002 by Hohn Read More
Central bankers are like alcoholics – drunk on stupidity and arrogance; and, like a suffering alcoholic, reticent to address the real problem.
Reading up on the dangers of alcohol, I’m told that it rots your liver, kills brain cells, makes you impotent, fat, gives you stomach ulcers, and (though I’m far from an expert in this field) as far as I can tell, it makes your skin look like a used condom.
Obviously too much of it is bad juju.
In a similar fashion, central bankers had an opportunity in the GFC to put the bottle down. But instead they raided the liquor cabinet and have turned our financial system into something resembling a used condom, all the while trying desperately to inflate it. The problem, of course, like an empty condom is that key ingredients are missing.
Just as an alcoholic can’t cure alcoholism with binge drinking, central bankers cannot and will not cure the current economic malaise with monetary binge drinking.
Sovereign debt is pretty high on my list of asymmetric opportunities. In fact, in 2014 we published an extensive report covering global debt which included both sovereign and private debt.
I had my chief analyst “V” and his team thoroughly revisit where we’re at today in the world of drunken debt orgy, and the results are quite staggering. They could be summarized with:
“Deleveraging? What do you mean by deleveraging?”
Government debt has been growing since 2007 at an annual rate of 9.3% with three quarters of this coming from advanced economies. Talk about binge drinking to cure alcoholism…
One of the wonderful things about binge drinking is that reckless behaviour is best shared with friends. To really let your hair down and release the shackles it’s wonderful knowing that not only are you going to have a wild time, but when the morning comes you can share the hangover with similarly afflicted friends. Commiseration is so much better with friends.
So Who Are These Binge Drinking Friends?
Well, here we have a list of the drinkers who need to endure a hangover and deleverage. The chart below is taken from a McKinsey study where they estimated what it would take for a dozen OECD countries to begin deleveraging in terms of fiscal policy and GDP growth.
The chart below shows what additional GDP growth and fiscal adjustment (as % of GDP) would be required to begin deleveraging:
Source: based on data from McKinsey.
he main conclusion: it’s just not possible. And here’s why…
In order to begin deleveraging these countries would need to sustain current GDP growth and budget surplus continuously.
Not gonna happen!
Instead, debts are expected to continue rising.
Missing from the above group is the Middle Kingdom and this is where a lot of asymmetry lies. Principally because few market participants are looking at it.
By international standards, China’s public debt level is rather benign – a mere 50% or so of GDP. But, as with virtually every animal in our sovereign debt zoo, it has a number of peculiarities worth looking at.
It is interesting to note that data on China’s government debt has changed since we did our original Global Debt report. Below is the chart we took from the Trading Economics website in June 2014:
And this is the chart updated:
The sources have changed, with China’s Ministry of Finance replaced by the IMF and we can see now with IMF numbers that in fact the numbers for the previous ten years of data show an almost doubling. Funny that.
This shows how cryptic the Chinese authorities are in disclosing their financial data and how difficult it is to get to the truth. And if something is being hidden, it’s probably not a mere omission.
Notably, more than half of China’s government debt is that of local governments, whose borrowing grew at a an annual rate of 27% between 2007 and 2014 – 2.5x faster than central government borrowing. Local government debt reached $2.9 trillion in 2014.
No Way Out
Capital moving into increasingly risky assets accelerated by credit formation have turned the banking sector into a truly enormous $34 trillion monster. At 340% of GDP and finding themselves at the end of the cycle, the need to recapitalize their banking system will become ever more apparent as loan impairment rockets higher.
The market seems to think that the PBOC has sufficient reserves to deal with this problem.
Not so fast…
Using up China’s foreign reserves for debt repayment will put pressure on the Chinese currency. A scenario we’ve already seen playing out. The country’s foreign reserves have declined by 20% since their $4 trillion peak in 2014.
Remember, since 2004 the yuan has appreciated some 60%. This has been a result of the influx of capital chasing Chinese growth as well as deliberate and consistent weakening of its trading partners currencies including the BOJ, ECB and, until recently, the US Fed.
We continue to think that the Chinese will be forced into a binge drinking session of their own, instituting a QE program which will put additional pressure on the yuan. After all, they’ll only be following from their already drunk American and European drinking buddies.
Right now they’re trying to stem capital outflows by opening up their bond markets under the guise of liberalizing their currency and internationalizing it.
As Dow Jones reports:
“China’s latest move to open up its over $6 trillion interbank bond market allows money to flow into the country at a time of rising capital outflows, and follows smaller moves last year to give foreign investors greater access to China’s labyrinthine capital markets. Foreign investors hold approximately 2% of China’s interbank bond market, which is the third-largest in the world.”
This isn’t the first time we’ve seen this game played. Don’t be fooled.
Buying into Chinese corporate or sovereign bonds will be an excellent trade. But certainly not here and not now.
As this plays itself out the opportunities to get long, once the currency has crashed and we’ve closed out short yuan positions, we’ll almost certainly find some Chinese blue chip corporate debt trading in double digit yields.
Right now the game is decidedly on and that game involves being short.
Great investments are forged in difficult times and times they are difficult.
“Always do sober what you said you’d do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut.” – Ernest Hemingway