Denali Case Study: David (FINL) vs. Goliath (GCO) also see Kevin Byun of Denali Investors The John Malone Complex – A Study in Financial Brilliance and Denali Investors Up 34% YTD After 66% Return In 2013
Case Study #1
What happens when the following get together?
Carlson Capital's Black Diamond Arbitrage Partners fund added 1.3% net fees in the first quarter of 2021, according to a copy of the firm's March 2021 investor update, which ValueWalk has been able to review. Q1 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more At the end of the quarter, merger arbitrage investments represented 89% of Read More
Peaking Stock Prices
Big Deal Fees
David (FINL) vs. Goliath (GCO)
•In a David vs. Goliath scenario, FINL won the bidding contest in June 2007 against FL (a much larger competitor) to purchase GCO (a much larger company by market cap).
•The terms were for $1.5b in cash, or $54.50 per share, with funding provided by UBS. A very overvalued deal.
•Tail end of the LBO mania.
•By September 2007, in combination with the news and the consumer and retail sector being hit hard, FINL traded down from $11 – $15 per share to about $5 per share. GCO was trading at $45 per share.
Outcome Band includes:
•The deal closes (FINL buys GCO)
•The deal breaks (FINL does not buy GCO)
•Something in between…
Embedded legal uncertainty (MAC, solvency certificate, judge, jurisdiction)…
ays to Place an Investment
•Long/Short FINL, or
What is the risk*/reward?
FINL: appr. 1/5 to 1/10
GCO: appr. 1/1 to1/2
*Risk = permanent loss of capital, not beta
Ways to Place an Investment #1
A better approach #1…
Long both FINL and GCO
Why both? Counterintuitive…
Standard merger arb analysis on GCO alone is limited Insurance/hedge “cost”
Transfer of value concept Combination increases safety
“The Ratio” – 1/5 risk/reward ratio or 0/4.5?
Ways to Place an Investment #2
A better approach #2…
Mr. Market gives little credit these days – time to act Always be able to walk away
All said, the thesis boils down to…
Heads I Win, Tails I Don’t Lose
By going long both FINL and GCO:
Investment boils down to – heads I win (likely a lot), tails I break even (pretty much).
•There is a near-term catalyst that creates value – the M&A deal between FINL and GCO will either close or break.
•The outcome does not matter: in the former, we lose nothing; in the latter, potential for 100% to 400% upside.
•Waiting for a possibly unencumbered FINL is just as valid.
No posts to display