The survey sponsored by FIS highlights that banks having a separate board-level risk committee report higher median ROA and ROE.
The FIS-sponsored “2014 Risk Practices Survey” notes a number of important best practices have begun to emerge over the last few years in the management of risk. The survey was conducted in January and is based on 107 online responses from independent directors and senior bank executives, primarily chief risk officers, of banks with over $1 billion in assets.
Mandate under Dodd-Frank Act
The survey points out that the Dodd-Frank Act mandates publicly traded bank holding companies with over $10 billion in assets to establish separate risk committees of the board and banks over $50 billion to additionally hire chief risk officers.
Prescience Partners returned 6.75% for the second quarter, underperforming the S&P 500's 8.55% return but coming out ahead of the Barclay Equity Long/ Short Index's 2.62% return. However, for the first six months of the year, Prescience is up 30.66%, doubling the S&P's 15.25% return and smashing the Barclay Equity Long/ Short Index's 9.27% return. Read More
The survey points out that sensing the benefits, smaller banks are also proactively following suit.
The survey highlights that a best-practice approach can positively impact financial performance of banks. However, many banks still have some fine-tuning to do when it comes to risk management.
Benefits accrue from separate risk committee
The survey results reveals that respondents whose banks have a separate board-level risk committee report a higher median return on assets (ROA) at 1.00 and higher median return on equity (ROE) at 9.50, as compared to banks that govern risk within a combined audit / risk committee or within the audit committee.
The following table captures the enhanced financial performance from banks having board-level risk committee:
The following table highlights how the board from banks of different sizes primarily handle risk governance:
Despite the benefits accruing from having a separate risk committee, some banks have not chosen to establish a separate risk committee. The following graph highlights the reasons for not going for such a separate risk committee:
Benefits from training
57% of directors to the survey feel that the board could benefit from more training in understanding how new regulations impact and pose risk to the bank, while 53% want a deeper understanding of emerging risks, such as risks associated with cyber security or Unfair, Deceptive or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP).
The following graph captures the respondents’ feedback on benefit from education and training to the board:
Over half of bank officers and 40% of respondents overall, highlighted that maintaining the technology and data infrastructure to support decision-making is a top risk management challenge. The following table captures the growing need for technology to support risk-related decision-making: