The Social Media “Bubble”: Six Important Points by Brad Cornell, Professor of Finance at Caltech
With respect to a host of the newer social media companies such as Snapchat, Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB)’s Pinterest, WhatsApp and no doubt numerous of companies of which I am unaware, I think he significantly understates the extent of the overvaluation. There is a second aggregation issue that Damodaran does not account for – namely that advertising will ultimately be correlated with consumption. There is little point in advertising products to people who will not or cannot buy them.
It turns out that the dramatic growth new social media is driven by people ages 12 to 22 or even younger. This is not surprising. Research in biology suggests that there are evolutionary reasons why the “sexing” of the brain in adolescence produces an intense focus on social interaction and sort. Social media are now the method of choice for that interaction instead of passing notes in class or gathering in the corridors. The social media services that are currently seen as cool have a dramatic spikes in usage, but there a good reasons why in all but a few unique cases that popularity will never be monetized. They include, most prominently, the following.
At this year's annual Robin Hood conference, which was held virtually, the founder of the world's largest hedge fund, Ray Dalio, talked about asset bubbles and how investors could detect as well as deal with bubbles in the marketplace. Q1 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more Dalio believes that by studying past market cycles Read More
1. Young social media users account for a small fraction of total consumption. Eventually, advertisers will realize you can’t sell washer-dryers or home remodeling services to teenagers.
2. Point one might not be a problem if the audience were loyal users who became committed to a service for years or decades, but just the reverse is true. Young people are adverse to what the previous generation found cool. Novelty is a virtue in and of itself.
3. Possible solutions to point two are switching costs and barriers to entry, but neither works for most social media companies. The cost of producing new applications is within the resources of small startups. The current hot media companies are examples. The switching costs, if they are even costs, are small as well. To young people trying new things is novel and fun so there may be switching “benefits”.
4. The foregoing points also rule out charging for service. What could be more uncool than paying for something that the latest and greatest start-up is offering for free.
The bottom line is that for social media companies that rely on the young the problem is not that they have yet to monetize their operations, it is that they never will. The path to profits is not through “cool” but through necessity. At one time, Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) and Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) were cool innovations used mostly by the young. Now they are both necessities used by everyone. That is why the companies are so valuable. But few sexy new social media companies are likely to make that transition to necessity so investors should “be afraid, be very afraid.”
Sign up for our free newsletter never miss an article plus get our free value investing e-book