Retirement Ripoff Counter Heads Past $10 Billion, Groups Condemn Plan To Stall Fiduciary Rule
Savers Need Fully-Enforced Fiduciary Rule, Not Wall Street-Backed Delay
AFR Debuts Video of Retired Veteran Scammed by Financial Adviser
A decade ago, no one talked about tail risk hedge funds, which were a minuscule niche of the market. However, today many large investors, including pension funds and other institutions, have mandates that require the inclusion of tail risk protection. In a recent interview with ValueWalk, Kris Sidial of tail risk fund Ambrus Group, a Read More
As the Department of Labor pushes ahead with a rule that would delay full enforcement of the fiduciary rule, Americans for Financial Reform, as part of the Save our Retirement coalition, is highlighting the costs to retirement savers of not having this common-sense consumer protection that simply ensures financial advisers provide the best possible advice. The department's comment period on its plans ends today.
"Delaying the full enforcement of the fiduciary rule means seniors and people saving for retirement are being and will be be bilked out of their hard earned money -- billions of dollars per year," said Lisa Donner, executive director of Americans for Financial Reform. "An insecure retirement for you and a spouse is a painful human cost that goes beyond the billions of dollars at stake. And it’s not simply a delay; it’s about carving out time to weaken it at the behest of the worst actors on Wall Street."
In April, we dramatized the costs by projecting the Retirement Ripoff Counter onto well-known buildings in Washington, DC, including President Donald Trump's hotel.
Then, the cost to retirement savers was about $2.8 billion. This past weekend, the number climbed above $10 billion.
That same day in April, we heard from Steve Wingate, a retired veteran from Illinois who fell victim to the type of treatment that would be prohibited under the fiduciary rule. We've created a short video about his case.
The department is now rushing to finalize an 18-month delay in the enforcement of the fiduciary rule. This wrongheaded move would cost retirement savers another $10.9 billion over 30 years as compliance with the rule varies widely and leaves confused investors at the mercy of unscrupulous advisers, according to the Economic Policy Institute.